2D MOT 2015 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
JPDA_OP
1. online method using public detections new
37.8
3.6
±11.3
7.50.4% 96.1% 1,02458,18929 (5.5)119 (22.5)77.7Public
Anonymous submission
NEW_NW
2. online method using public detections
49.4
-38.8
±53.1
2.00.1% 98.3% 25,60659,56980 (26.3)112 (36.8)5.8Public
Anonymous submission
TC_SIAMESE
3. online method using public detections
40.8
20.2
±13.9
32.62.6% 67.5% 6,12742,596294 (9.6)825 (26.9)13.0Public
Y. Yoon, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multiple-Object Tracking using Selective Deep Appearance Matching. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2018.
LINF1
4. using public detections
33.8
24.5
±15.4
34.85.5% 64.6% 5,86440,207298 (8.6)744 (21.5)7.5Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
AM
5. online method using public detections
20.6
34.3
±13.7
48.311.4% 43.4% 5,15434,848348 (8.0)1,463 (33.8)0.5Public
Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
HAM_SADF
6. online method using public detections
30.8
25.2
±13.9
37.85.7% 58.3% 7,33038,275357 (9.5)745 (19.8)18.7Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
HybridDAT
7. online method using public detections
21.1
35.0
±15.0
47.711.4% 42.2% 8,45531,140358 (7.3)1,267 (25.7)4.6Public
M. Yang, Y. Jia. A Hybrid Data Association Framework for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016.
SLTV15
8. online method using public detections
29.9
27.6
±15.1
40.37.2% 51.9% 6,58137,566358 (9.2)884 (22.7)20.9Public
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology(GIST), Machine Learning and Vision Laboratory
JPDA_m
9. using public detections
33.3
23.8
±15.1
33.85.0% 58.1% 6,37340,084365 (10.5)869 (25.0)32.6Public
H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
RAR15pub
10. online method using public detections
23.2
35.1
±12.5
45.413.0% 42.3% 6,77132,717381 (8.1)1,523 (32.6)5.4Public
K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
TO
11. using public detections
37.9
25.7
±13.5
32.74.3% 57.4% 4,77940,511383 (11.2)600 (17.6)5.0Public
S. Manen, R. Timofte, D. Dai, L. Gool. Leveraging single for multi-target tracking using a novel trajectory overlap affinity measure. In 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2016.
mLK
12. online method using public detections
21.0
35.1
±12.9
47.512.3% 38.3% 5,67833,815383 (8.5)1,175 (26.1)1.0Public
Yuan Zhang, Di Xie and Shiliang Pu (Hikvision Research Institute)
TFMOT
13. online method using public detections
38.4
23.8
±11.9
32.34.9% 62.0% 4,53341,873404 (12.7)792 (24.9)11.3Public
M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
MHT_DAM
14. using public detections
24.3
32.4
±15.6
45.316.0% 43.8% 9,06432,060435 (9.1)826 (17.3)0.7Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
NOMT
15. using public detections
21.0
33.7
±16.2
44.612.2% 44.0% 7,76232,547442 (9.4)823 (17.5)11.5Public
W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
oICF
16. online method using public detections
36.8
27.1
±14.9
40.56.4% 48.7% 7,59436,757454 (11.3)1,660 (41.3)1.4Public
H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
TSN
17. using public detections
25.2
35.5
±12.1
43.014.4% 43.6% 5,68233,515454 (10.0)967 (21.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
JointMC
18. using public detections
21.5
35.6
±18.9
45.123.2% 39.3% 10,58028,508457 (8.5)969 (18.1)0.6Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
GMPHD
19. online method using public detections
40.8
18.5
±12.7
28.43.9% 55.3% 7,86441,766459 (14.3)1,266 (39.5)19.8Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
HAM_INTP15
20. online method using public detections
25.3
28.6
±13.8
41.410.0% 44.0% 7,48535,910460 (11.1)1,038 (25.0)18.7Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
TDAM
21. online method using public detections
26.2
33.0
±9.8
46.113.3% 39.1% 10,06430,617464 (9.2)1,506 (30.0)5.9Public
M. Yang, Y. Jia. Temporal dynamic appearance modeling for online multi-person tracking. In Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2016.
GSCR
22. online method using public detections
41.3
15.8
±10.5
27.91.8% 61.0% 7,59743,633514 (17.7)1,010 (34.8)28.1Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Online multi-person tracking based on global sparse collaborative representations. In ICIP, 2015.
DAC_min
23. online method using public detections
31.8
26.1
±13.3
36.96.8% 50.1% 8,15036,736519 (12.9)1,046 (26.0)11.6Public
GIST
DCO_X
24. using public detections
42.9
19.6
±14.1
31.55.1% 54.9% 10,65238,232521 (13.8)819 (21.7)0.3Public
A. Milan, K. Schindler, S. Roth. Multi-Target Tracking by Discrete-Continuous Energy Minimization. In IEEE PAMI, 2016.
DAC_min
25. online method using public detections
30.5
26.1
±13.6
37.58.9% 48.1% 9,47835,382539 (12.7)1,115 (26.3)11.6Public
DSA_MOT
26. online method using public detections
26.7
29.4
±13.0
38.210.0% 45.1% 7,69135,146545 (12.7)1,133 (26.5)9.6Public
Anonymous submission
OMT_DFH
27. online method using public detections
35.9
21.2
±17.2
37.37.1% 46.5% 13,21834,657563 (12.9)1,255 (28.8)28.6Public
J. Ju, D. Kim, B. Ku, D. Han, H. Ko. Online multi-object tracking with efficient track drift and fragmentation handling. In J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 2017.
TripBFT15
28. online method using public detections
25.2
37.1
±15.3
48.412.6% 39.7% 8,30529,732580 (11.2)1,193 (23.1)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
AP_HWDPL_p
29. online method using public detections
16.8
38.5
±9.9
47.18.7% 37.4% 4,00533,203586 (12.8)1,263 (27.5)6.7Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, S. Chong, Z. Zijie, B. Bo. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Convolutional Neural Networks. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2017.
CRF_RNN15
30. using public detections
18.8
38.9
±15.4
49.320.9% 29.4% 10,66926,291591 (10.3)1,270 (22.2)1.3Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
SCEA
31. online method using public detections
33.2
29.1
±12.2
37.28.9% 47.3% 6,06036,912604 (15.1)1,182 (29.6)6.8Public
J. Yoon, C. Lee, M. Yang, K. Yoon. Online Multi-object Tracking via Structural Constraint Event Aggregation. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
CDA_DDALpb
32. online method using public detections
26.3
32.8
±10.6
38.89.7% 42.2% 4,98335,690614 (14.7)1,583 (37.8)2.3Public
S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
TSMLCDEnew
33. using public detections
23.6
34.3
±13.1
44.114.0% 39.4% 7,86931,908618 (12.9)959 (20.0)6.5Public
B. Wang, G. Wang, K. L. Chan, L. Wang. Tracklet Association by Online Target-Specific Metric Learning and Coherent Dynamics Estimation. In arXiv:1511.06654, 2015.
DCOR
34. online method using public detections new
40.4
22.4
±12.1
24.73.3% 57.4% 5,60341,410634 (19.4)1,686 (51.7)28.9Public
Anonymous submission
TC_ODAL
35. online method using public detections
56.1
15.1
±15.0
0.03.2% 55.8% 12,97038,538637 (17.1)1,716 (46.0)1.7Public
S. Bae, K. Yoon. Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking based on Tracklet Confidence and Online Discriminative Appearance Learning. In CVPR, 2014.
SiameseCNN
36. using public detections
32.8
29.0
±15.1
34.38.5% 48.4% 5,16037,798639 (16.6)1,316 (34.2)52.8Public
Laura Leal-Taixé, Cristian Canton-Ferrer, Konrad Schindler. Learning by Tracking: Siamese CNN for Robust Target Association. DeepVision Workshop (CVPR), Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), June 2016.
LP_SSVM
37. using public detections
34.7
25.2
±13.7
34.05.8% 53.0% 8,36936,932646 (16.2)849 (21.3)41.3Public
S. Wang, C. Fowlkes. Learning Optimal Parameters for Multi-target Tracking with Contextual Interactions. In International Journal of Computer Vision, 2016.
TBSS15
38. online method using public detections
35.2
29.2
±12.5
37.26.8% 43.8% 6,06836,779649 (16.2)1,508 (37.6)11.5Public
X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
TripT15
39. online method using public detections
29.7
35.7
±14.9
47.711.1% 39.8% 8,72930,152655 (12.9)1,614 (31.7)1.1Public
Anonymous submission
MCF_PHD
40. using public detections
27.3
29.9
±20.0
38.211.9% 44.0% 8,89233,529656 (14.4)989 (21.8)12.2Public
N. Wojke, D. Paulus. Global data association for the Probability Hypothesis Density filter using network flows. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
MDP
41. online method using public detections
28.9
30.3
±14.6
44.713.0% 38.4% 9,71732,422680 (14.4)1,500 (31.8)1.1Public
Y. Xiang, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Learning to Track: Online Multi-Object Tracking by Decision Making. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015.
RMOT
42. online method using public detections
46.4
18.6
±17.5
32.65.3% 53.3% 12,47336,835684 (17.1)1,282 (32.0)7.9Public
J. Yoon, H. Yang, J. Lim, K. Yoon. Bayesian Multi-Object Tracking Using Motion Context from Multiple Objects. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015.
SegTrack
43. using public detections
44.8
22.5
±15.2
31.55.8% 63.9% 7,89039,020697 (19.1)737 (20.2)0.2Public
A. Milan, L. Leal-Taixé, K. Schindler, I. Reid. Joint Tracking and Segmentation of Multiple Targets. In CVPR, 2015.
SAS_MOT15
44. using public detections
44.7
22.2
±13.8
27.23.1% 61.6% 5,59141,531700 (21.6)1,240 (38.3)8.9Public
Submission id 177
QuadMOT
45. using public detections
25.9
33.8
±14.8
40.412.9% 36.9% 7,89832,061703 (14.7)1,430 (29.9)3.7Public
J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
CNNTCM
46. using public detections
28.3
29.6
±13.9
36.811.2% 44.0% 7,78634,733712 (16.4)943 (21.7)1.7Public
B. Wang, K. L. Chan, L. Wang, B. Shuai, Z. Zuo, T. Liu, G. Wang. Joint Learning of Convolutional Neural Networks and Temporally Constrained Metrics for Tracklet Association. In DeepVision Workshop (CVPR), 2016.
cf_mdp
47. online method using public detections
18.7
31.4
±14.7
43.716.1% 34.3% 10,11831,284718 (14.6)1,469 (29.9)450.4Public
Anonymous submission
TBX
48. using public detections
41.3
27.5
±13.3
33.810.4% 45.8% 7,96835,810759 (18.2)1,528 (36.6)0.1Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, B. Rosenhahn, K. Schindler. Tracking with multi-level features. In arXiv:1607.07304, 2016.
CMOT
49. online method using public detections
28.0
27.6
±14.0
43.310.5% 49.0% 9,45134,207800 (18.0)1,584 (35.7)5,783.0Public
Anonymous submission
TSDA_OAL
50. online method using public detections
40.7
18.6
±17.6
36.19.4% 42.3% 16,35032,853806 (17.3)1,544 (33.2)19.7Public
H. Ko. Online multi-person tracking with two-stage data association and online appearance model learning. In IET Computer Vision, 2017.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
CEM
51. using public detections
41.5
19.3
±17.5
0.08.5% 46.5% 14,18034,591813 (18.6)1,023 (23.4)1.1Public
A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
CF_MCMC
52. using public detections
30.8
31.4
±11.3
36.410.3% 40.9% 8,79832,541814 (17.3)1,711 (36.4)3.2Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTTpub
53. online method using public detections
40.8
22.3
±14.2
32.85.4% 52.7% 7,92438,982833 (22.8)1,485 (40.6)12.2Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
DCCRF
54. online method using public detections
27.8
33.6
±11.0
39.110.4% 37.6% 5,91734,002866 (19.4)1,566 (35.1)0.1Public
H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
PHD_GSDL
55. online method using public detections
34.1
30.5
±14.9
38.87.6% 41.2% 6,53435,284879 (20.6)2,208 (51.9)8.2Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
SNM
56. online method using public detections
30.8
31.3
±16.5
38.212.6% 35.4% 8,90332,393926 (19.6)2,382 (50.4)14.8Public
Anonymous submission
BnW
57. online method using public detections
18.8
42.9
±14.0
47.925.4% 25.2% 8,33825,813926 (16.0)1,652 (28.5)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
LFNF
58. using public detections
30.5
31.6
±12.3
33.19.6% 41.7% 5,94335,095961 (22.4)1,106 (25.8)4.0Public
Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
RSCNN
59. using public detections
30.5
29.5
±23.9
37.012.9% 36.3% 11,86630,474976 (19.4)1,176 (23.3)4.0Public
Heba Mahgoub, Khaled Mostafa, Khaled T. Wassif and Ibrahim Farag, “Multi-Target Tracking Using Hierarchical Convolutional Features and Motion Cues” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 8(11), 2017.
MotiCon
60. using public detections
45.8
23.1
±16.4
29.44.7% 52.0% 10,40435,8441,018 (24.4)1,061 (25.5)1.4Public
L. Leal-Taixé, M. Fenzi, A. Kuznetsova, B. Rosenhahn, S. Savarese. Learning an image-based motion context for multiple people tracking. In CVPR, 2014.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
AMIR15
61. online method using public detections
21.5
37.6
±12.5
46.015.8% 26.8% 7,93329,3971,026 (19.7)2,024 (38.8)1.9Public
A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
ZRT
62. online method using public detections
41.0
22.8
±19.3
37.89.7% 38.4% 14,42331,9321,080 (22.5)2,267 (47.2)5.3Public
Anonymous submission
SMOT
63. using public detections
56.7
18.2
±10.3
0.02.8% 54.8% 8,78040,3101,148 (33.4)2,132 (62.0)2.7Public
C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
RETR15
64. online method using public detections
39.9
20.8
±14.5
37.49.2% 38.6% 15,50131,9881,172 (24.4)2,325 (48.5)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
CppSORT
65. online method using public detections
42.5
21.7
±11.8
26.83.7% 49.1% 8,42238,4541,231 (32.9)2,005 (53.6)1,112.1Public
S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
YT
66. using public detections
45.7
23.5
±11.6
26.84.4% 49.5% 5,53740,2101,270 (36.8)1,817 (52.6)34.4Public
Anonymous submission
MTSTracker
67. online method using public detections
39.6
20.6
±18.2
31.99.0% 36.9% 15,16132,2121,387 (29.2)2,357 (49.5)19.3Public
F. Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, F. Bremond. Multi-Object Tracking using Multi-Channel Part Appearance Representation. In International conference on Advanced video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2017.
ELP
68. using public detections
40.6
25.0
±10.8
26.27.5% 43.8% 7,34537,3441,396 (35.6)1,804 (46.0)5.7Public
N. McLaughlin, J. Martinez Del Rincon, P. Miller. Enhancing Linear Programming with Motion Modeling for Multi-target Tracking. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015.
KCF_Simple
69. online method using public detections
49.4
18.3
±11.1
25.12.6% 49.8% 8,97639,8051,436 (40.8)2,634 (74.8)35.6Public
Anonymous submission
EDA_GNN
70. online method using public detections
37.8
21.8
±13.8
27.89.0% 40.2% 11,97034,5871,488 (34.0)1,851 (42.4)56.4Public
Paper ID 2713
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
RNN_LSTM
71. online method using public detections
47.8
19.0
±15.2
17.15.5% 45.6% 11,57836,7061,490 (37.0)2,081 (51.7)165.2Public
A. Milan, S. Rezatofighi, A. Dick, I. Reid, K. Schindler. Online Multi-Target Tracking using Recurrent Neural Networks. In AAAI, 2017.
LP2D
72. using public detections
43.9
19.8
±14.2
0.06.7% 41.2% 11,58036,0451,649 (39.9)1,712 (41.4)112.1Public
MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
SST_MOT15
73. online method using public detections
29.3
35.8
±19.3
39.67.8% 39.0% 4,06533,6691,728 (38.2)1,312 (29.0)6.3Public
Shijie Sun, Naveed Akhtar, Ajmal Mian
ALExTRAC
74. using public detections
50.3
17.0
±12.1
17.33.9% 52.4% 9,23339,9331,859 (53.1)1,872 (53.5)3.7Public
A. Bewley, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. ALExTRAC: Affinity Learning by Exploring Temporal Reinforcement within Association Chains. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (to appear) 2016.
TBD
75. using public detections
55.3
15.9
±17.6
0.06.4% 47.9% 14,94334,7771,939 (44.7)1,963 (45.2)0.7Public
A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
MCFCOS_CNN
76. online method using public detections
40.8
25.5
±20.8
32.09.3% 34.4% 12,34431,3782,064 (42.2)2,618 (53.5)0.5Public
Anonymous submission
DS_RNN
77. online method using public detections
35.8
27.8
±11.4
29.67.1% 37.9% 6,90335,2382,192 (51.4)3,011 (70.6)19.3Public
Anonymous submission
siam
78. online method using public detections
47.2
23.9
±17.1
23.35.7% 37.7% 8,69535,1302,939 (68.6)3,886 (90.7)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
Bar_dist2
79. online method using public detections
38.9
20.1
±14.5
21.77.4% 36.8% 11,16134,8743,084 (71.3)3,823 (88.4)215.8Public
Anonymous submission
Bar_dist
80. online method using public detections
41.0
18.0
±16.0
17.65.7% 35.9% 10,01936,2224,161 (101.4)5,043 (122.9)2,891.5Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFN ID Sw.FragHzDetector
DP_NMS
81. using public detections
44.3
14.5
±14.5
19.76.0% 40.8% 13,17134,8144,537 (104.7)3,090 (71.3)444.8Public
H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
EFMC
82. online method using public detections
48.5
14.9
±9.8
11.53.3% 50.5% 5,58341,0855,623 (169.7)3,443 (103.9)24.6Public
Anonymous submission
LDCT
83. online method using public detections
40.8
4.7
±41.3
16.811.4% 32.5% 14,06632,15612,348 (259.1)2,918 (61.2)20.7Public
F. Solera, S. Calderara, R. Cucchiara. Learning to Divide and Conquer for Online Multi-Target Tracking. In ICCV, 2015

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
11578372161440

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

TUD-Crossing

TUD-Crossing

(60.0% MOTA)

PETS09-S2L2

PETS09-S2L2

(40.1% MOTA)

ETH-Jelmoli

ETH-Jelmoli

(36.6% MOTA)

...

...

Venice-1

Venice-1

(20.2% MOTA)

ADL-Rundle-1

ADL-Rundle-1

(15.6% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.