2D MOT 2015 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
AMIR15
1. online method using public detections
17.3
37.6
±12.5
46.015.8% 26.8% 7,93329,3971,026 (19.7)2,024 (38.8)1.9Public
A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
KCF
2. online method using public detections
16.8
38.9
±14.5
44.516.6% 31.5% 7,32129,501720 (13.9)1,440 (27.7)0.3Public
Paper ID 2988
LDCT
3. online method using public detections
34.7
4.7
±41.3
16.811.4% 32.5% 14,06632,15612,348 (259.1)2,918 (61.2)20.7Public
F. Solera, S. Calderara, R. Cucchiara. Learning to Divide and Conquer for Online Multi-Target Tracking. In ICCV, 2015
Otakudj
4. online method using public detections
30.4
29.2
±13.9
42.212.3% 33.8% 9,55832,0081,924 (40.2)2,463 (51.4)0.6Public
Anonymous submission
ARMS
5. using public detections
25.8
30.1
±13.4
43.311.8% 33.8% 9,11732,0421,785 (37.3)2,483 (51.9)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
Stitiching
6. using public detections
29.5
29.3
±25.1
42.611.8% 34.1% 9,55532,0181,877 (39.2)2,428 (50.7)4.8Public
Anonymous submission
cf_mdp
7. online method using public detections
16.3
31.4
±14.7
43.716.1% 34.3% 10,11831,284718 (14.6)1,469 (29.9)450.4Public
Anonymous submission
Q_cf
8. online method using public detections
23.8
31.6
±13.5
43.816.0% 34.7% 9,71131,579742 (15.3)1,505 (31.0)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
SNM
9. online method using public detections
26.7
31.3
±16.5
38.212.6% 35.4% 8,90332,393926 (19.6)2,382 (50.4)14.8Public
Anonymous submission
AMT
10. online method using public detections
18.0
30.4
±13.6
43.915.0% 35.6% 10,39131,641725 (14.9)1,641 (33.8)296.0Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
Bar_dist
11. online method using public detections new
34.8
18.0
±16.0
17.65.7% 35.9% 10,01936,2224,161 (101.4)5,043 (122.9)2,891.5Public
Anonymous submission
RSCNN
12. using public detections
26.0
29.5
±23.9
37.012.9% 36.3% 11,86630,474976 (19.4)1,176 (23.3)4.0Public
Heba Mahgoub, Khaled Mostafa, Khaled T. Wassif and Ibrahim Farag, “Multi-Target Tracking Using Hierarchical Convolutional Features and Motion Cues” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 8(11), 2017.
QuadMOT
13. using public detections
21.7
33.8
±14.8
40.412.9% 36.9% 7,89832,061703 (14.7)1,430 (29.9)3.7Public
J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
MTSTracker
14. online method using public detections
34.2
20.6
±18.2
31.99.0% 36.9% 15,16132,2121,387 (29.2)2,357 (49.5)19.3Public
F. Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, F. Bremond. Multi-Object Tracking using Multi-Channel Part Appearance Representation. In International conference on Advanced video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2017.
AP_HWDPL_p
15. online method using public detections
14.5
38.5
±9.9
47.18.7% 37.4% 4,00533,203586 (12.8)1,263 (27.5)6.7Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, S. Chong, Z. Zijie, B. Bo. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Convolutional Neural Networks. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2017.
DCCRF
16. online method using public detections
25.1
33.6
±11.0
39.110.4% 37.6% 5,91734,002866 (19.4)1,566 (35.1)0.1Public
H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
mLK
17. online method using public detections
17.3
35.1
±12.9
47.512.3% 38.3% 5,67833,815383 (8.5)1,175 (26.1)1.0Public
Yuan Zhang, Di Xie and Shiliang Pu (Hikvision Research Institute)
MDP
18. online method using public detections
24.3
30.3
±14.6
44.713.0% 38.4% 9,71732,422680 (14.4)1,500 (31.8)1.1Public
Y. Xiang, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Learning to Track: Online Multi-Object Tracking by Decision Making. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015.
TDAM
19. online method using public detections
21.4
33.0
±9.8
46.113.3% 39.1% 10,06430,617464 (9.2)1,506 (30.0)5.9Public
M. Yang, Y. Jia. Temporal dynamic appearance modeling for online multi-person tracking. In Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2016.
JointMC
20. using public detections
17.5
35.6
±18.9
45.123.2% 39.3% 10,58028,508457 (8.5)969 (18.1)0.6Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, Z. Yu, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. A Multi-cut Formulation for Joint Segmentation and Tracking of Multiple Objects. In CoRR, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TSMLCDEnew
21. using public detections
19.3
34.3
±13.1
44.114.0% 39.4% 7,86931,908618 (12.9)959 (20.0)6.5Public
B. Wang, G. Wang, K. L. Chan, L. Wang. Tracklet Association by Online Target-Specific Metric Learning and Coherent Dynamics Estimation. In arXiv:1511.06654, 2015.
TripBFT15
22. online method using public detections
20.3
37.1
±15.3
48.412.6% 39.7% 8,30529,732580 (11.2)1,193 (23.1)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
TripT15
23. online method using public detections
24.4
35.7
±14.9
47.711.1% 39.8% 8,72930,152655 (12.9)1,614 (31.7)1.1Public
Anonymous submission
DP_NMS
24. using public detections
37.5
14.5
±14.5
19.76.0% 40.8% 13,17134,8144,537 (104.7)3,090 (71.3)444.8Public
H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
CF_MCMC
25. using public detections
26.7
31.4
±11.3
36.410.3% 40.9% 8,79832,541814 (17.3)1,711 (36.4)3.2Public
Anonymous submission
LP2D
26. using public detections
36.7
19.8
±14.2
0.06.7% 41.2% 11,58036,0451,649 (39.9)1,712 (41.4)112.1Public
MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
PHD_GSDL
27. online method using public detections
29.3
30.5
±14.9
38.87.6% 41.2% 6,53435,284879 (20.6)2,208 (51.9)8.2Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
LFNF
28. using public detections
26.0
31.6
±12.3
33.19.6% 41.7% 5,94335,095961 (22.4)1,106 (25.8)4.0Public
Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
HybridDAT
29. online method using public detections
17.0
35.0
±15.0
47.711.4% 42.2% 8,45531,140358 (7.3)1,267 (25.7)4.6Public
M. Yang, Y. Jia. A Hybrid Data Association Framework for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016.
CDA_DDALpb
30. online method using public detections
22.5
32.8
±10.6
38.89.7% 42.2% 4,98335,690614 (14.7)1,583 (37.8)2.3Public
S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TSDA_OAL
31. online method using public detections
35.2
18.6
±17.6
36.19.4% 42.3% 16,35032,853806 (17.3)1,544 (33.2)19.7Public
H. Ko. Online multi-person tracking with two-stage data association and online appearance model learning. In IET Computer Vision, 2017.
TPM
32. using public detections
20.1
36.2
±12.8
43.615.4% 42.6% 5,65033,102420 (9.1)928 (20.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
AM
33. online method using public detections
17.9
34.3
±13.7
48.311.4% 43.4% 5,15434,848348 (8.0)1,463 (33.8)0.5Public
Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
ELP
34. using public detections
33.9
25.0
±10.8
26.27.5% 43.8% 7,34537,3441,396 (35.6)1,804 (46.0)5.7Public
N. McLaughlin, J. Martinez Del Rincon, P. Miller. Enhancing Linear Programming with Motion Modeling for Multi-target Tracking. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015.
MHT_DAM
35. using public detections
19.7
32.4
±15.6
45.316.0% 43.8% 9,06432,060435 (9.1)826 (17.3)0.7Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
NOMT
36. using public detections
17.4
33.7
±16.2
44.612.2% 44.0% 7,76232,547442 (9.4)823 (17.5)11.5Public
W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
CNNTCM
37. using public detections
24.8
29.6
±13.9
36.811.2% 44.0% 7,78634,733712 (16.4)943 (21.7)1.7Public
B. Wang, K. L. Chan, L. Wang, B. Shuai, Z. Zuo, T. Liu, G. Wang. Joint Learning of Convolutional Neural Networks and Temporally Constrained Metrics for Tracklet Association. In DeepVision Workshop (CVPR), 2016.
MCF_PHD
38. using public detections
23.7
29.9
±20.0
38.211.9% 44.0% 8,89233,529656 (14.4)989 (21.8)12.2Public
N. Wojke, D. Paulus. Global data association for the Probability Hypothesis Density filter using network flows. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, 2016.
CNNEMBED
39. online method using public detections
24.2
23.6
±14.9
41.012.9% 44.1% 14,04732,398496 (10.5)829 (17.5)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
RNN_LSTM
40. online method using public detections
40.3
19.0
±15.2
17.15.5% 45.6% 11,57836,7061,490 (37.0)2,081 (51.7)165.2Public
A. Milan, S. Rezatofighi, A. Dick, I. Reid, K. Schindler. Online Multi-Target Tracking using Recurrent Neural Networks. In AAAI, 2017.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TBX
41. using public detections
35.4
27.5
±13.3
33.810.4% 45.8% 7,96835,810759 (18.2)1,528 (36.6)0.1Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, B. Rosenhahn, K. Schindler. Tracking with multi-level features. In arXiv:1607.07304, 2016.
CEM
42. using public detections
35.3
19.3
±17.5
0.08.5% 46.5% 14,18034,591813 (18.6)1,023 (23.4)1.1Public
A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
OMT_DFH
43. online method using public detections
30.3
21.2
±17.2
37.37.1% 46.5% 13,21834,657563 (12.9)1,255 (28.8)28.6Public
J. Ju, D. Kim, B. Ku, D. Han, H. Ko. Online multi-object tracking with efficient track drift and fragmentation handling. In J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 2017.
SCEA
44. online method using public detections
27.8
29.1
±12.2
37.28.9% 47.3% 6,06036,912604 (15.1)1,182 (29.6)6.8Public
J. Yoon, C. Lee, M. Yang, K. Yoon. Online Multi-object Tracking via Structural Constraint Event Aggregation. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
TBD
45. using public detections
46.4
15.9
±17.6
0.06.4% 47.9% 14,94334,7771,939 (44.7)1,963 (45.2)0.7Public
A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
SiameseCNN
46. using public detections
27.8
29.0
±15.1
34.38.5% 48.4% 5,16037,798639 (16.6)1,316 (34.2)52.8Public
Laura Leal-Taixé, Cristian Canton-Ferrer, Konrad Schindler. Learning by Tracking: Siamese CNN for Robust Target Association. DeepVision Workshop (CVPR), Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), June 2016.
oICF
47. online method using public detections
30.8
27.1
±14.9
40.56.4% 48.7% 7,59436,757454 (11.3)1,660 (41.3)1.4Public
H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
CMOT
48. online method using public detections
25.4
27.6
±14.0
43.310.5% 49.0% 9,45134,207800 (18.0)1,584 (35.7)5,783.0Public
Anonymous submission
CppSORT
49. online method using public detections
36.3
21.7
±11.8
26.83.7% 49.1% 8,42238,4541,231 (32.9)2,005 (53.6)1,112.1Public
S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
YT
50. using public detections
38.9
23.5
±11.6
26.84.4% 49.5% 5,53740,2101,270 (36.8)1,817 (52.6)34.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MotiCon
51. using public detections
38.5
23.1
±16.4
29.44.7% 52.0% 10,40435,8441,018 (24.4)1,061 (25.5)1.4Public
L. Leal-Taixé, M. Fenzi, A. Kuznetsova, B. Rosenhahn, S. Savarese. Learning an image-based motion context for multiple people tracking. In CVPR, 2014.
ALExTRAC
52. using public detections
41.3
17.0
±12.1
17.33.9% 52.4% 9,23339,9331,859 (53.1)1,872 (53.5)3.7Public
A. Bewley, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. ALExTRAC: Affinity Learning by Exploring Temporal Reinforcement within Association Chains. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (to appear) 2016.
EAMTTpub
53. online method using public detections
34.0
22.3
±14.2
32.85.4% 52.7% 7,92438,982833 (22.8)1,485 (40.6)12.2Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
LP_SSVM
54. using public detections
28.6
25.2
±13.7
34.05.8% 53.0% 8,36936,932646 (16.2)849 (21.3)41.3Public
S. Wang, C. Fowlkes. Learning Optimal Parameters for Multi-target Tracking with Contextual Interactions. In International Journal of Computer Vision, 2016.
RMOT
55. online method using public detections
38.1
18.6
±17.5
32.65.3% 53.3% 12,47336,835684 (17.1)1,282 (32.0)7.9Public
J. Yoon, H. Yang, J. Lim, K. Yoon. Bayesian Multi-Object Tracking Using Motion Context from Multiple Objects. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015.
SMOT
56. using public detections
46.4
18.2
±10.3
0.02.8% 54.8% 8,78040,3101,148 (33.4)2,132 (62.0)2.7Public
C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
DCO_X
57. using public detections
36.0
19.6
±14.1
31.55.1% 54.9% 10,65238,232521 (13.8)819 (21.7)0.3Public
A. Milan, K. Schindler, S. Roth. Multi-Target Tracking by Discrete-Continuous Energy Minimization. In IEEE PAMI, 2016.
GMPHD
58. online method using public detections
33.7
18.5
±12.7
28.43.9% 55.3% 7,86441,766459 (14.3)1,266 (39.5)19.8Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
TC_ODAL
59. online method using public detections
45.8
15.1
±15.0
0.03.2% 55.8% 12,97038,538637 (17.1)1,716 (46.0)1.7Public
S. Bae, K. Yoon. Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking based on Tracklet Confidence and Online Discriminative Appearance Learning. In CVPR, 2014.
TO
60. using public detections
31.1
25.7
±13.5
32.74.3% 57.4% 4,77940,511383 (11.2)600 (17.6)5.0Public
S. Manen, R. Timofte, D. Dai, L. Gool. Leveraging single for multi-target tracking using a novel trajectory overlap affinity measure. In 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MT MLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
JPDA_m
61. using public detections
27.8
23.8
±15.1
33.85.0% 58.1% 6,37340,084365 (10.5)869 (25.0)32.6Public
H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
HAM_SADF
62. online method using public detections
25.3
25.2
±13.9
37.85.7% 58.3% 7,33038,275357 (9.5)745 (19.8)18.7Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In arXiv:1805.10916, 2018.
GSCR
63. online method using public detections
34.3
15.8
±10.5
27.91.8% 61.0% 7,59743,633514 (17.7)1,010 (34.8)28.1Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Online multi-person tracking based on global sparse collaborative representations. In ICIP, 2015.
SAS_MOT15
64. using public detections
36.7
22.2
±13.8
27.23.1% 61.6% 5,59141,531700 (21.6)1,240 (38.3)8.9Public
Submission id 177
TFMOT
65. online method using public detections
31.7
23.8
±11.9
32.34.9% 62.0% 4,53341,873404 (12.7)792 (24.9)11.3Public
M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
SegTrack
66. using public detections
37.2
22.5
±15.2
31.55.8% 63.9% 7,89039,020697 (19.1)737 (20.2)0.2Public
A. Milan, L. Leal-Taixé, K. Schindler, I. Reid. Joint Tracking and Segmentation of Multiple Targets. In CVPR, 2015.
LINF1
67. using public detections
27.7
24.5
±15.4
34.85.5% 64.6% 5,86440,207298 (8.6)744 (21.5)7.5Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
TC_SIAMESE
68. online method using public detections
33.8
20.2
±13.9
32.62.6% 67.5% 6,12742,596294 (9.6)825 (26.9)13.0Public
Y. Yoon, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multiple-Object Tracking using Selective Deep Appearance Matching. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2018.

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
11578372161440

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

TUD-Crossing

TUD-Crossing

(63.8% MOTA)

PETS09-S2L2

PETS09-S2L2

(42.5% MOTA)

ETH-Jelmoli

ETH-Jelmoli

(38.4% MOTA)

...

...

Venice-1

Venice-1

(21.8% MOTA)

ADL-Rundle-1

ADL-Rundle-1

(16.5% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.