2D MOT 2015 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ALExTRAC
1. using public detections
50.3
17.0
±12.1
17.33.9% 52.4% 9,23339,9331,859 (53.1)1,872 (53.5)3.7Public
A. Bewley, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. ALExTRAC: Affinity Learning by Exploring Temporal Reinforcement within Association Chains. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (to appear) 2016.
AM
2. online method using public detections
20.6
34.3
±13.7
48.311.4% 43.4% 5,15434,848348 (8.0)1,463 (33.8)0.5Public
Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
AMIR15
3. online method using public detections
21.5
37.6
±12.5
46.015.8% 26.8% 7,93329,3971,026 (19.7)2,024 (38.8)1.9Public
A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
AP_HWDPL_p
4. online method using public detections
16.8
38.5
±9.9
47.18.7% 37.4% 4,00533,203586 (12.8)1,263 (27.5)6.7Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, S. Chong, Z. Zijie, B. Bo. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Convolutional Neural Networks. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2017.
Bar_dist
5. online method using public detections
41.0
18.0
±16.0
17.65.7% 35.9% 10,01936,2224,161 (101.4)5,043 (122.9)2,891.5Public
Anonymous submission
Bar_dist2
6. online method using public detections
38.9
20.1
±14.5
21.77.4% 36.8% 11,16134,8743,084 (71.3)3,823 (88.4)215.8Public
Anonymous submission
BnW
7. online method using public detections
18.8
42.9
±14.0
47.925.4% 25.2% 8,33825,813926 (16.0)1,652 (28.5)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
CDA_DDALpb
8. online method using public detections
26.3
32.8
±10.6
38.89.7% 42.2% 4,98335,690614 (14.7)1,583 (37.8)2.3Public
S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
CEM
9. using public detections
41.5
19.3
±17.5
0.08.5% 46.5% 14,18034,591813 (18.6)1,023 (23.4)1.1Public
A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
CF_MCMC
10. using public detections
30.8
31.4
±11.3
36.410.3% 40.9% 8,79832,541814 (17.3)1,711 (36.4)3.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
cf_mdp
11. online method using public detections
18.7
31.4
±14.7
43.716.1% 34.3% 10,11831,284718 (14.6)1,469 (29.9)450.4Public
Anonymous submission
CMOT
12. online method using public detections
28.0
27.6
±14.0
43.310.5% 49.0% 9,45134,207800 (18.0)1,584 (35.7)5,783.0Public
Anonymous submission
CNNTCM
13. using public detections
28.3
29.6
±13.9
36.811.2% 44.0% 7,78634,733712 (16.4)943 (21.7)1.7Public
B. Wang, K. L. Chan, L. Wang, B. Shuai, Z. Zuo, T. Liu, G. Wang. Joint Learning of Convolutional Neural Networks and Temporally Constrained Metrics for Tracklet Association. In DeepVision Workshop (CVPR), 2016.
CppSORT
14. online method using public detections
42.5
21.7
±11.8
26.83.7% 49.1% 8,42238,4541,231 (32.9)2,005 (53.6)1,112.1Public
S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
CRF_RNN15
15. using public detections
18.8
38.9
±15.4
49.320.9% 29.4% 10,66926,291591 (10.3)1,270 (22.2)1.3Public
Anonymous submission
DAC_min
16. online method using public detections
30.5
26.1
±13.6
37.58.9% 48.1% 9,47835,382539 (12.7)1,115 (26.3)11.6Public
DAC_min
17. online method using public detections
31.8
26.1
±13.3
36.96.8% 50.1% 8,15036,736519 (12.9)1,046 (26.0)11.6Public
GIST
DCCRF
18. online method using public detections
27.8
33.6
±11.0
39.110.4% 37.6% 5,91734,002866 (19.4)1,566 (35.1)0.1Public
H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
DCOR
19. online method using public detections new
40.4
22.4
±12.1
24.73.3% 57.4% 5,60341,410634 (19.4)1,686 (51.7)28.9Public
Anonymous submission
DCO_X
20. using public detections
42.9
19.6
±14.1
31.55.1% 54.9% 10,65238,232521 (13.8)819 (21.7)0.3Public
A. Milan, K. Schindler, S. Roth. Multi-Target Tracking by Discrete-Continuous Energy Minimization. In IEEE PAMI, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
DP_NMS
21. using public detections
44.3
14.5
±14.5
19.76.0% 40.8% 13,17134,8144,537 (104.7)3,090 (71.3)444.8Public
H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
DSA_MOT
22. online method using public detections
26.7
29.4
±13.0
38.210.0% 45.1% 7,69135,146545 (12.7)1,133 (26.5)9.6Public
Anonymous submission
DS_RNN
23. online method using public detections
35.8
27.8
±11.4
29.67.1% 37.9% 6,90335,2382,192 (51.4)3,011 (70.6)19.3Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTTpub
24. online method using public detections
40.8
22.3
±14.2
32.85.4% 52.7% 7,92438,982833 (22.8)1,485 (40.6)12.2Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
EDA_GNN
25. online method using public detections
37.8
21.8
±13.8
27.89.0% 40.2% 11,97034,5871,488 (34.0)1,851 (42.4)56.4Public
Paper ID 2713
EFMC
26. online method using public detections
48.5
14.9
±9.8
11.53.3% 50.5% 5,58341,0855,623 (169.7)3,443 (103.9)24.6Public
Anonymous submission
ELP
27. using public detections
40.6
25.0
±10.8
26.27.5% 43.8% 7,34537,3441,396 (35.6)1,804 (46.0)5.7Public
N. McLaughlin, J. Martinez Del Rincon, P. Miller. Enhancing Linear Programming with Motion Modeling for Multi-target Tracking. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015.
GMPHD
28. online method using public detections
40.8
18.5
±12.7
28.43.9% 55.3% 7,86441,766459 (14.3)1,266 (39.5)19.8Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
GSCR
29. online method using public detections
41.3
15.8
±10.5
27.91.8% 61.0% 7,59743,633514 (17.7)1,010 (34.8)28.1Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Online multi-person tracking based on global sparse collaborative representations. In ICIP, 2015.
HAM_INTP15
30. online method using public detections
25.3
28.6
±13.8
41.410.0% 44.0% 7,48535,910460 (11.1)1,038 (25.0)18.7Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HAM_SADF
31. online method using public detections
30.8
25.2
±13.9
37.85.7% 58.3% 7,33038,275357 (9.5)745 (19.8)18.7Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
HybridDAT
32. online method using public detections
21.1
35.0
±15.0
47.711.4% 42.2% 8,45531,140358 (7.3)1,267 (25.7)4.6Public
M. Yang, Y. Jia. A Hybrid Data Association Framework for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016.
JointMC
33. using public detections
21.5
35.6
±18.9
45.123.2% 39.3% 10,58028,508457 (8.5)969 (18.1)0.6Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
JPDA_m
34. using public detections
33.3
23.8
±15.1
33.85.0% 58.1% 6,37340,084365 (10.5)869 (25.0)32.6Public
H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
JPDA_OP
35. online method using public detections new
37.8
3.6
±11.3
7.50.4% 96.1% 1,02458,18929 (5.5)119 (22.5)77.7Public
Anonymous submission
KCF_Simple
36. online method using public detections
49.4
18.3
±11.1
25.12.6% 49.8% 8,97639,8051,436 (40.8)2,634 (74.8)35.6Public
Anonymous submission
LDCT
37. online method using public detections
40.8
4.7
±41.3
16.811.4% 32.5% 14,06632,15612,348 (259.1)2,918 (61.2)20.7Public
F. Solera, S. Calderara, R. Cucchiara. Learning to Divide and Conquer for Online Multi-Target Tracking. In ICCV, 2015
LFNF
38. using public detections
30.5
31.6
±12.3
33.19.6% 41.7% 5,94335,095961 (22.4)1,106 (25.8)4.0Public
Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
LINF1
39. using public detections
33.8
24.5
±15.4
34.85.5% 64.6% 5,86440,207298 (8.6)744 (21.5)7.5Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
LP2D
40. using public detections
43.9
19.8
±14.2
0.06.7% 41.2% 11,58036,0451,649 (39.9)1,712 (41.4)112.1Public
MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
LP_SSVM
41. using public detections
34.7
25.2
±13.7
34.05.8% 53.0% 8,36936,932646 (16.2)849 (21.3)41.3Public
S. Wang, C. Fowlkes. Learning Optimal Parameters for Multi-target Tracking with Contextual Interactions. In International Journal of Computer Vision, 2016.
MCFCOS_CNN
42. online method using public detections
40.8
25.5
±20.8
32.09.3% 34.4% 12,34431,3782,064 (42.2)2,618 (53.5)0.5Public
Anonymous submission
MCF_PHD
43. using public detections
27.3
29.9
±20.0
38.211.9% 44.0% 8,89233,529656 (14.4)989 (21.8)12.2Public
N. Wojke, D. Paulus. Global data association for the Probability Hypothesis Density filter using network flows. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, 2016.
MDP
44. online method using public detections
28.9
30.3
±14.6
44.713.0% 38.4% 9,71732,422680 (14.4)1,500 (31.8)1.1Public
Y. Xiang, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Learning to Track: Online Multi-Object Tracking by Decision Making. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015.
MHT_DAM
45. using public detections
24.3
32.4
±15.6
45.316.0% 43.8% 9,06432,060435 (9.1)826 (17.3)0.7Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
mLK
46. online method using public detections
21.0
35.1
±12.9
47.512.3% 38.3% 5,67833,815383 (8.5)1,175 (26.1)1.0Public
Yuan Zhang, Di Xie and Shiliang Pu (Hikvision Research Institute)
MotiCon
47. using public detections
45.8
23.1
±16.4
29.44.7% 52.0% 10,40435,8441,018 (24.4)1,061 (25.5)1.4Public
L. Leal-Taixé, M. Fenzi, A. Kuznetsova, B. Rosenhahn, S. Savarese. Learning an image-based motion context for multiple people tracking. In CVPR, 2014.
MTSTracker
48. online method using public detections
39.6
20.6
±18.2
31.99.0% 36.9% 15,16132,2121,387 (29.2)2,357 (49.5)19.3Public
F. Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, F. Bremond. Multi-Object Tracking using Multi-Channel Part Appearance Representation. In International conference on Advanced video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2017.
NEW_NW
49. online method using public detections
49.4
-38.8
±53.1
2.00.1% 98.3% 25,60659,56980 (26.3)112 (36.8)5.8Public
Anonymous submission
NOMT
50. using public detections
21.0
33.7
±16.2
44.612.2% 44.0% 7,76232,547442 (9.4)823 (17.5)11.5Public
W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
oICF
51. online method using public detections
36.8
27.1
±14.9
40.56.4% 48.7% 7,59436,757454 (11.3)1,660 (41.3)1.4Public
H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
OMT_DFH
52. online method using public detections
35.9
21.2
±17.2
37.37.1% 46.5% 13,21834,657563 (12.9)1,255 (28.8)28.6Public
J. Ju, D. Kim, B. Ku, D. Han, H. Ko. Online multi-object tracking with efficient track drift and fragmentation handling. In J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 2017.
PHD_GSDL
53. online method using public detections
34.1
30.5
±14.9
38.87.6% 41.2% 6,53435,284879 (20.6)2,208 (51.9)8.2Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
QuadMOT
54. using public detections
25.9
33.8
±14.8
40.412.9% 36.9% 7,89832,061703 (14.7)1,430 (29.9)3.7Public
J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
RAR15pub
55. online method using public detections
23.2
35.1
±12.5
45.413.0% 42.3% 6,77132,717381 (8.1)1,523 (32.6)5.4Public
K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
RETR15
56. online method using public detections
39.9
20.8
±14.5
37.49.2% 38.6% 15,50131,9881,172 (24.4)2,325 (48.5)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
RMOT
57. online method using public detections
46.4
18.6
±17.5
32.65.3% 53.3% 12,47336,835684 (17.1)1,282 (32.0)7.9Public
J. Yoon, H. Yang, J. Lim, K. Yoon. Bayesian Multi-Object Tracking Using Motion Context from Multiple Objects. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015.
RNN_LSTM
58. online method using public detections
47.8
19.0
±15.2
17.15.5% 45.6% 11,57836,7061,490 (37.0)2,081 (51.7)165.2Public
A. Milan, S. Rezatofighi, A. Dick, I. Reid, K. Schindler. Online Multi-Target Tracking using Recurrent Neural Networks. In AAAI, 2017.
RSCNN
59. using public detections
30.5
29.5
±23.9
37.012.9% 36.3% 11,86630,474976 (19.4)1,176 (23.3)4.0Public
Heba Mahgoub, Khaled Mostafa, Khaled T. Wassif and Ibrahim Farag, “Multi-Target Tracking Using Hierarchical Convolutional Features and Motion Cues” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 8(11), 2017.
SAS_MOT15
60. using public detections
44.7
22.2
±13.8
27.23.1% 61.6% 5,59141,531700 (21.6)1,240 (38.3)8.9Public
Submission id 177
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SCEA
61. online method using public detections
33.2
29.1
±12.2
37.28.9% 47.3% 6,06036,912604 (15.1)1,182 (29.6)6.8Public
J. Yoon, C. Lee, M. Yang, K. Yoon. Online Multi-object Tracking via Structural Constraint Event Aggregation. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
SegTrack
62. using public detections
44.8
22.5
±15.2
31.55.8% 63.9% 7,89039,020697 (19.1)737 (20.2)0.2Public
A. Milan, L. Leal-Taixé, K. Schindler, I. Reid. Joint Tracking and Segmentation of Multiple Targets. In CVPR, 2015.
siam
63. online method using public detections
47.2
23.9
±17.1
23.35.7% 37.7% 8,69535,1302,939 (68.6)3,886 (90.7)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
SiameseCNN
64. using public detections
32.8
29.0
±15.1
34.38.5% 48.4% 5,16037,798639 (16.6)1,316 (34.2)52.8Public
Laura Leal-Taixé, Cristian Canton-Ferrer, Konrad Schindler. Learning by Tracking: Siamese CNN for Robust Target Association. DeepVision Workshop (CVPR), Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), June 2016.
SLTV15
65. online method using public detections
29.9
27.6
±15.1
40.37.2% 51.9% 6,58137,566358 (9.2)884 (22.7)20.9Public
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology(GIST), Machine Learning and Vision Laboratory
SMOT
66. using public detections
56.7
18.2
±10.3
0.02.8% 54.8% 8,78040,3101,148 (33.4)2,132 (62.0)2.7Public
C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
SNM
67. online method using public detections
30.8
31.3
±16.5
38.212.6% 35.4% 8,90332,393926 (19.6)2,382 (50.4)14.8Public
Anonymous submission
SST_MOT15
68. online method using public detections
29.3
35.8
±19.3
39.67.8% 39.0% 4,06533,6691,728 (38.2)1,312 (29.0)6.3Public
Shijie Sun, Naveed Akhtar, Ajmal Mian
TBD
69. using public detections
55.3
15.9
±17.6
0.06.4% 47.9% 14,94334,7771,939 (44.7)1,963 (45.2)0.7Public
A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
TBSS15
70. online method using public detections
35.2
29.2
±12.5
37.26.8% 43.8% 6,06836,779649 (16.2)1,508 (37.6)11.5Public
X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TBX
71. using public detections
41.3
27.5
±13.3
33.810.4% 45.8% 7,96835,810759 (18.2)1,528 (36.6)0.1Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, B. Rosenhahn, K. Schindler. Tracking with multi-level features. In arXiv:1607.07304, 2016.
TC_ODAL
72. online method using public detections
56.1
15.1
±15.0
0.03.2% 55.8% 12,97038,538637 (17.1)1,716 (46.0)1.7Public
S. Bae, K. Yoon. Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking based on Tracklet Confidence and Online Discriminative Appearance Learning. In CVPR, 2014.
TC_SIAMESE
73. online method using public detections
40.8
20.2
±13.9
32.62.6% 67.5% 6,12742,596294 (9.6)825 (26.9)13.0Public
Y. Yoon, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multiple-Object Tracking using Selective Deep Appearance Matching. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2018.
TDAM
74. online method using public detections
26.2
33.0
±9.8
46.113.3% 39.1% 10,06430,617464 (9.2)1,506 (30.0)5.9Public
M. Yang, Y. Jia. Temporal dynamic appearance modeling for online multi-person tracking. In Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2016.
TFMOT
75. online method using public detections
38.4
23.8
±11.9
32.34.9% 62.0% 4,53341,873404 (12.7)792 (24.9)11.3Public
M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
TO
76. using public detections
37.9
25.7
±13.5
32.74.3% 57.4% 4,77940,511383 (11.2)600 (17.6)5.0Public
S. Manen, R. Timofte, D. Dai, L. Gool. Leveraging single for multi-target tracking using a novel trajectory overlap affinity measure. In 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2016.
TripBFT15
77. online method using public detections
25.2
37.1
±15.3
48.412.6% 39.7% 8,30529,732580 (11.2)1,193 (23.1)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
TripT15
78. online method using public detections
29.7
35.7
±14.9
47.711.1% 39.8% 8,72930,152655 (12.9)1,614 (31.7)1.1Public
Anonymous submission
TSDA_OAL
79. online method using public detections
40.7
18.6
±17.6
36.19.4% 42.3% 16,35032,853806 (17.3)1,544 (33.2)19.7Public
H. Ko. Online multi-person tracking with two-stage data association and online appearance model learning. In IET Computer Vision, 2017.
TSMLCDEnew
80. using public detections
23.6
34.3
±13.1
44.114.0% 39.4% 7,86931,908618 (12.9)959 (20.0)6.5Public
B. Wang, G. Wang, K. L. Chan, L. Wang. Tracklet Association by Online Target-Specific Metric Learning and Coherent Dynamics Estimation. In arXiv:1511.06654, 2015.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TSN
81. using public detections
25.2
35.5
±12.1
43.014.4% 43.6% 5,68233,515454 (10.0)967 (21.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
YT
82. using public detections
45.7
23.5
±11.6
26.84.4% 49.5% 5,53740,2101,270 (36.8)1,817 (52.6)34.4Public
Anonymous submission
ZRT
83. online method using public detections
41.0
22.8
±19.3
37.89.7% 38.4% 14,42331,9321,080 (22.5)2,267 (47.2)5.3Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
11578372161440

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

TUD-Crossing

TUD-Crossing

(60.0% MOTA)

PETS09-S2L2

PETS09-S2L2

(40.1% MOTA)

ETH-Jelmoli

ETH-Jelmoli

(36.6% MOTA)

...

...

Venice-1

Venice-1

(20.2% MOTA)

ADL-Rundle-1

ADL-Rundle-1

(15.6% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.