MOT16 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SMOT
1. using public detections
55.8
29.7
±7.3
0.05.3% 47.7% 17,426107,5523,108 (75.8)4,483 (109.3)0.2Public
C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
PDetTracId
2. online method using public detections
27.0
49.7
±9.4
46.816.7% 37.3% 4,39386,2411,040 (19.7)3,652 (69.3)2.4Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_N1T
3. online method using public detections
44.2
33.3
±8.9
25.55.5% 56.0% 1,750116,4523,499 (96.8)3,594 (99.5)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD Filter for Multiple Target, Multiple Type Visual Tracking. In CoRR, 2017.
MTDF
4. online method using public detections
36.8
45.7
±11.2
40.114.1% 36.4% 12,01884,9701,987 (37.2)3,377 (63.2)1.5Public
Anonymous submission
GCK
5. online method using public detections
47.4
28.7
±8.5
30.63.4% 51.0% 21,436106,4242,217 (53.3)3,277 (78.7)25.1Public
Anonymous submission
PMPTracker
6. online method using public detections
40.4
40.3
±11.7
38.210.4% 42.0% 10,07197,5241,343 (28.9)2,764 (59.4)148.0Public
Light version of PTZ camera Mutiple People Tracker
YT16
7. online method using public detections
42.7
37.8
±8.8
31.18.8% 46.1% 4,384106,3652,655 (63.7)2,750 (66.0)12.1Public
Anonymous submission
JCSTD
8. online method using public detections
30.3
47.4
±8.3
41.114.4% 36.4% 8,07686,6381,266 (24.1)2,697 (51.4)8.8Public
Anonymous submission
DCOR
9. online method using public detections
41.5
28.3
±9.0
21.73.4% 63.9% 1,618128,345849 (28.7)2,592 (87.5)32.9Public
Anonymous submission
LSST16O
10. online method using public detections
25.2
49.2
±10.2
56.513.4% 41.4% 7,18784,875606 (11.3)2,497 (46.7)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HISP_T
11. online method using public detections
43.6
35.9
±8.5
28.97.8% 50.1% 6,412107,9182,594 (63.6)2,298 (56.3)4.8Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
TBD
12. using public detections
49.6
33.7
±9.2
0.07.2% 54.2% 5,804112,5872,418 (63.2)2,252 (58.9)1.3Public
A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
CppSORT
13. online method using public detections
41.0
31.5
±9.0
27.74.3% 59.9% 3,048120,2781,587 (46.6)2,239 (65.8)687.1Public
S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
HISP_T2
14. online method using public detections
41.8
37.2
±8.6
29.77.6% 50.7% 3,323108,8592,370 (58.8)2,234 (55.4)4.8Public
Anonymous submission
CSAHD
15. online method using public detections
34.7
43.7
±11.6
45.710.5% 46.1% 8,31893,273984 (20.1)2,164 (44.3)7.0Public
Anonymous submission
OVBT
16. online method using public detections
48.6
38.4
±8.8
37.87.5% 47.3% 11,51799,4631,321 (29.1)2,140 (47.1)0.3Public
Y. Ban, S. Ba, X. Alameda-Pineda, R. Horaud. Tracking Multiple Persons Based on a Variational Bayesian Model. In BMTT 2016, .
TAR
17. online method using public detections
29.0
49.4
±8.1
40.018.4% 30.6% 11,22079,8391,180 (21.0)2,052 (36.5)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
RAR16pub
18. online method using public detections
33.0
45.9
±9.7
48.813.2% 41.9% 6,87191,173648 (13.0)1,992 (39.8)0.9Public
K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
SRPN16
19. online method using public detections
29.0
48.2
±8.5
51.814.5% 37.7% 7,70485,982838 (15.9)1,985 (37.6)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT
20. online method using public detections
25.8
47.6
±8.2
50.915.2% 38.3% 9,25385,431792 (14.9)1,858 (35.0)20.6Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
CDA_DDALv2
21. online method using public detections
33.9
43.9
±7.8
45.110.7% 44.4% 6,45095,175676 (14.1)1,795 (37.6)0.5Public
S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
BnW
22. online method using public detections
16.3
53.6
±13.6
52.819.0% 36.6% 5,21778,471909 (16.0)1,742 (30.6)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM
23. online method using public detections
36.0
40.1
±10.1
43.87.1% 46.2% 8,50399,891789 (17.5)1,736 (38.4)5.8Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
TST_PLS
24. online method using public detections
42.7
39.7
±11.1
43.36.7% 47.4% 8,447100,728783 (17.5)1,730 (38.7)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
AMIR
25. online method using public detections
25.4
47.2
±7.7
46.314.0% 41.6% 2,68192,856774 (15.8)1,675 (34.1)1.0Public
A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
GMMCP
26. using public detections
42.3
38.1
±7.8
35.58.6% 50.9% 6,607105,315937 (22.2)1,669 (39.5)0.5Public
A. Dehghan, S. Assari, M. Shah.. GMMCP-Tracker:Globally Optimal Generalized Maximum Multi Clique Problem for Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2015.
EAMTT_pub
27. online method using public detections
37.3
38.8
±8.5
42.47.9% 49.1% 8,114102,452965 (22.0)1,657 (37.8)11.8Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
DMMOT
28. online method using public detections
25.8
46.1
±11.1
54.817.4% 42.7% 7,90989,874532 (10.5)1,616 (31.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
FWT
29. using public detections
27.3
47.8
±9.4
44.319.1% 38.2% 8,88685,487852 (16.0)1,534 (28.9)0.6Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
STAM16
30. online method using public detections
32.0
46.0
±9.1
50.014.6% 43.6% 6,89591,117473 (9.5)1,422 (28.4)0.2Public
Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TBSS
31. online method using public detections
34.5
44.6
±9.3
42.612.3% 43.9% 4,13696,128790 (16.7)1,419 (30.0)3.0Public
X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
oICF
32. online method using public detections
34.4
43.2
±10.2
49.311.3% 48.5% 6,65196,515381 (8.1)1,404 (29.8)0.4Public
H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
AFN
33. using public detections
21.8
49.0
±10.2
48.219.1% 35.7% 9,50882,506899 (16.4)1,383 (25.3)0.6Public
Paper ID 4411
DCCRF16
34. online method using public detections
34.2
44.8
±9.8
39.714.1% 42.3% 5,61394,133968 (20.0)1,378 (28.5)0.1Public
H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
NOTC
35. using public detections
17.8
49.8
±8.3
55.317.9% 37.7% 7,24883,614614 (11.3)1,372 (25.3)19.2Public
Anonymous submission
LP2D
36. using public detections
37.8
35.7
±10.1
34.28.7% 50.7% 5,084111,163915 (23.4)1,264 (32.4)49.3Public
MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
CRF_RNN16
37. using public detections
18.8
49.0
±7.2
53.918.1% 35.8% 8,49583,838621 (11.5)1,252 (23.2)1.3Public
Anonymous submission
TBNMF16
38. online method using public detections
28.8
45.6
±8.9
46.013.4% 43.5% 4,23094,435584 (12.1)1,229 (25.5)7.9Public
Anonymous submission
cm_test
39. online method using public detections
35.7
35.4
±20.2
40.36.5% 71.4% 4,427112,889402 (10.6)1,176 (30.9)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM6
40. using public detections
34.5
42.1
±9.7
47.814.9% 44.4% 11,63793,172753 (15.4)1,156 (23.6)1.8Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TripT
41. online method using public detections
24.5
48.1
±8.5
51.915.8% 40.2% 2,82791,210563 (11.3)1,143 (22.9)0.6Public
Anonymous submission
DRT
42. online method using public detections
36.3
34.7
±11.4
41.16.3% 61.8% 6,992111,617460 (11.9)1,127 (29.1)6.2Public
Anonymous submission
GCRA
43. using public detections
24.2
48.2
±8.3
48.612.9% 41.1% 5,10488,586821 (16.0)1,117 (21.7)2.8Public
C. Ma, C. Yang, F. Yang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, H. Jia, X. Xie. Trajectory Factory: Tracklet Cleaving and Re-connection by Deep Siamese Bi-GRU for Multiple Object Tracking. In ICME, 2018.
JMC
44. using public detections
26.2
46.3
±9.0
46.315.5% 39.7% 6,37390,914657 (13.1)1,114 (22.2)0.8Public
S. Tang, B. Andres, M. Andriluka, B. Schiele. Multi-Person Tracking by Multicuts and Deep Matching. In BMTT, 2016.
TDP
45. online method using public detections
40.0
33.9
±10.2
40.46.2% 62.2% 6,709113,249480 (12.7)1,105 (29.2)9.7Public
Anonymous submission
QuadMOT16
46. using public detections
34.1
44.1
±9.4
38.314.6% 44.9% 6,38894,775745 (15.5)1,096 (22.8)1.8Public
J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
LTTSC-CRF
47. using public detections
40.3
37.6
±9.9
42.19.6% 55.2% 11,969101,343481 (10.8)1,012 (22.8)0.6Public
N. Le, A. Heili, M. Odobez. Long-Term Time-Sensitive Costs for CRF-Based Tracking by Detection. In ECCVw, 2016.
LINF1
48. using public detections
32.7
41.0
±9.5
45.711.6% 51.3% 7,89699,224430 (9.4)963 (21.1)4.2Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
EDMT
49. using public detections
25.7
45.3
±9.1
47.917.0% 39.9% 11,12287,890639 (12.3)946 (18.3)1.8Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
LFNF16
50. using public detections
35.6
43.6
±11.0
41.613.3% 45.7% 6,61695,363836 (17.5)938 (19.7)0.6Public
Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
INTERA_MOT
51. using public detections
24.3
45.4
±8.6
47.718.1% 38.7% 13,40785,547600 (11.3)930 (17.5)4.3Public
L. Lan, X. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Tao, W. Gao, T. Huang. Interacting Tracklets for Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018.
EAGS16
52. using public detections
19.2
47.4
±10.4
50.117.3% 42.7% 8,36986,931575 (11.0)913 (17.5)197.3Public
H. Sheng, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Chen. Enhanced Association with Supervoxels in Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In IEEE Access, 2018.
TripBFT
53. online method using public detections
23.8
48.3
±8.1
50.915.4% 40.1% 2,70691,047543 (10.8)896 (17.9)0.5Public
Anonymous submission
eTC
54. using public detections
19.5
49.2
±9.1
56.117.3% 40.3% 8,40083,702606 (11.2)882 (16.3)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
HDTR
55. using public detections
14.5
53.6
±8.7
46.621.2% 37.0% 4,71479,353618 (10.9)833 (14.7)3.6Public
JCmin_MOT
56. online method using public detections
34.6
36.7
±9.1
36.27.5% 54.4% 2,936111,890667 (17.3)831 (21.5)14.8Public
M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
TSN
57. using public detections
26.2
48.2
±8.7
45.719.9% 38.9% 8,44785,315665 (12.5)829 (15.6)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
D_cost16
58. online method using public detections
31.4
39.9
±9.1
35.38.7% 50.2% 1,133107,586790 (19.3)824 (20.1)8.5Public
Anonymous submission
ASTT
59. using public detections
23.0
47.2
±9.6
44.316.3% 41.6% 4,68090,877633 (12.6)814 (16.2)0.5Public
Yi Tao el al., “Adaptive Spatio-temporal Model Based Multiple Object Tracking Considering a Moving Camera[C]”, International Conference on Universal Village (UV), 2018.
eHAF16
60. using public detections
23.0
47.2
±16.8
52.418.6% 42.8% 12,58683,107542 (10.0)787 (14.5)0.5Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MHT_DAM
61. using public detections
27.3
45.8
±8.9
46.116.2% 43.2% 6,41291,758590 (11.9)781 (15.7)0.8Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
NLLMPa
62. using public detections
21.2
47.6
±10.6
47.317.0% 40.4% 5,84489,093629 (12.3)768 (15.0)8.3Public
E. Levinkov, J. Uhrig, S. Tang, M. Omran, E. Insafutdinov, A. Kirillov, C. Rother, T. Brox, B. Schiele, B. Andres. Joint Graph Decomposition and Node Labeling: Problem, Algorithms, Applications. In CVPR, 2017.
deepS2
63. using public detections
25.0
46.0
±8.2
46.515.5% 42.6% 5,12492,697693 (14.1)759 (15.4)0.7Public
ID 32
CMT16
64. using public detections
16.5
47.6
±9.4
52.719.0% 43.0% 11,17783,779495 (9.2)757 (14.0)6.3Public
Anonymous submission
CEM
65. using public detections
40.3
33.2
±7.9
0.07.8% 54.4% 6,837114,322642 (17.2)731 (19.6)0.3Public
A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
GMPHD_HDA
66. online method using public detections
35.7
30.5
±6.9
33.44.6% 59.7% 5,169120,970539 (16.0)731 (21.7)13.6Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
TPM
67. using public detections
18.8
51.3
±9.3
47.918.7% 40.8% 2,70185,504569 (10.7)707 (13.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_ACT16
68. online method using public detections
31.8
38.1
±8.2
43.37.8% 54.4% 6,976105,434418 (9.9)707 (16.8)8.0Public
TLMHT
69. using public detections
20.7
48.7
±8.6
55.315.7% 44.5% 6,63286,504413 (7.9)642 (12.2)4.8Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
DP_NMS
70. using public detections
34.3
26.2
±9.3
31.24.1% 67.5% 3,689130,557365 (12.9)638 (22.5)5.9Public
H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
JPDA_m
71. using public detections
35.8
26.2
±6.1
0.04.1% 67.5% 3,689130,549365 (12.9)638 (22.5)22.2Public
H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MCjoint
72. using public detections
21.9
47.1
±10.8
52.320.4% 46.9% 6,70389,368370 (7.3)598 (11.7)0.6Public
}@article{DBLP:journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16, author = {Margret Keuper and Siyu Tang and Zhongjie Yu and Bjoern Andres and Thomas Brox and Bernt Schiele}, title = {A Multi-cut Formulation for Joint Segmentation and Tracking of Multiple Objects}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1607.06317}, year = {2016}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06317}, timestamp = {Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:41:31 +0200}, biburl = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bib/journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org} }
LMP
73. using public detections
19.4
48.8
±9.8
51.318.2% 40.1% 6,65486,245481 (9.1)595 (11.3)0.5Public
S. Tang, M. Andriluka, B. Andres, B. Schiele. Multiple People Tracking with Lifted Multicut and Person Re-identification. In CVPR, 2017.
NOMT
74. using public detections
20.5
46.4
±9.9
53.318.3% 41.4% 9,75387,565359 (6.9)504 (9.7)2.6Public
W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.

Due to a minor bug in the export script, all results were re-evaluated on April 11, 2016. Here is the old snapshot of the leaderboard.


Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
75919759182326

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT16-03

MOT16-03

(52.3% MOTA)

MOT16-06

MOT16-06

(43.8% MOTA)

MOT16-07

MOT16-07

(37.5% MOTA)

...

...

MOT16-08

MOT16-08

(29.5% MOTA)

MOT16-14

MOT16-14

(23.9% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.