MOT16 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
test_trker
1. using public detections
51.7
0.0
±0.0
0.00.0% 100.0% 7182,3260 (nan)0 (nan)22.3Public
Anonymous submission
NOMT
2. using public detections
33.5
46.4
±9.9
53.318.3% 41.4% 9,75387,565359 (6.9)504 (9.7)2.6Public
W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
HCC
3. using public detections
27.6
49.3
±10.2
50.717.8% 39.9% 5,33386,795391 (7.5)535 (10.2)0.8Public
L. Ma, S. Tang, M. Black, L. Gool. Customized Multi-Person Tracker. In Computer Vision -- ACCV 2018, 2018.
LMP
4. using public detections
31.6
48.8
±9.8
51.318.2% 40.1% 6,65486,245481 (9.1)595 (11.3)0.5Public
S. Tang, M. Andriluka, B. Andres, B. Schiele. Multiple People Tracking with Lifted Multicut and Person Re-identification. In CVPR, 2017.
MCjoint
5. using public detections
34.1
47.1
±10.8
52.320.4% 46.9% 6,70389,368370 (7.3)598 (11.7)0.6Public
}@article{DBLP:journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16, author = {Margret Keuper and Siyu Tang and Zhongjie Yu and Bjoern Andres and Thomas Brox and Bernt Schiele}, title = {A Multi-cut Formulation for Joint Segmentation and Tracking of Multiple Objects}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1607.06317}, year = {2016}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06317}, timestamp = {Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:41:31 +0200}, biburl = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bib/journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org} }
CMT16
6. using public detections
23.3
49.8
±9.0
59.216.6% 43.6% 9,22981,882365 (6.6)617 (11.2)6.3Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
DP_NMS
7. using public detections
47.9
26.2
±9.3
31.24.1% 67.5% 3,689130,557365 (12.9)638 (22.5)5.9Public
H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
JPDA_m
8. using public detections
49.0
26.2
±6.1
0.04.1% 67.5% 3,689130,549365 (12.9)638 (22.5)22.2Public
H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
TLMHT
9. using public detections
33.9
48.7
±8.6
55.315.7% 44.5% 6,63286,504413 (7.9)642 (12.2)4.8Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TPM
10. using public detections
30.9
51.3
±9.3
47.918.7% 40.8% 2,70185,504569 (10.7)707 (13.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
HAM_ACT16
11. online method using public detections
46.5
38.1
±8.2
43.37.8% 54.4% 6,976105,434418 (9.9)707 (16.8)8.0Public
ENFT
12. using public detections
21.3
50.0
±8.2
54.617.8% 41.1% 8,21482,541479 (8.8)724 (13.2)22.3Public
Anonymous submission
CEM
13. using public detections
55.7
33.2
±7.9
0.07.8% 54.4% 6,837114,322642 (17.2)731 (19.6)0.3Public
A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
GMPHD_HDA
14. online method using public detections
48.9
30.5
±6.9
33.44.6% 59.7% 5,169120,970539 (16.0)731 (21.7)13.6Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
ENFT16
15. using public detections
25.5
50.3
±8.3
55.019.2% 39.8% 8,34181,843490 (8.9)754 (13.7)0.4Public
BUAA
deepS2
16. using public detections
39.3
46.0
±8.2
46.515.5% 42.6% 5,12492,697693 (14.1)759 (15.4)0.7Public
ID 32
NLLMPa
17. using public detections
34.8
47.6
±10.6
47.317.0% 40.4% 5,84489,093629 (12.3)768 (15.0)8.3Public
E. Levinkov, J. Uhrig, S. Tang, M. Omran, E. Insafutdinov, A. Kirillov, C. Rother, T. Brox, B. Schiele, B. Andres. Joint Graph Decomposition and Node Labeling: Problem, Algorithms, Applications. In CVPR, 2017.
STCG
18. using public detections
30.3
49.3
±8.6
52.016.2% 41.4% 6,88684,979515 (9.6)775 (14.5)22.3Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_DAM
19. using public detections
41.8
45.8
±8.9
46.116.2% 43.2% 6,41291,758590 (11.9)781 (15.7)0.8Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
eHAF16
20. using public detections
35.5
47.2
±16.8
52.418.6% 42.8% 12,58683,107542 (10.0)787 (14.5)0.5Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
TestUnsup
21. online method using public detections
49.5
41.5
±9.0
44.913.7% 43.5% 12,59693,404643 (13.2)796 (16.3)19.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
MOTPPF
22. using public detections
31.3
48.4
±8.8
48.519.1% 39.8% 9,15284,266595 (11.1)802 (14.9)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
ASTT
23. using public detections
36.3
47.2
±9.6
44.316.3% 41.6% 4,68090,877633 (12.6)814 (16.2)0.5Public
Yi Tao el al., “Adaptive Spatio-temporal Model Based Multiple Object Tracking Considering a Moving Camera[C]”, International Conference on Universal Village (UV), 2018.
siameseCos
24. using public detections
34.3
49.4
±8.4
49.819.1% 39.4% 6,28185,384679 (12.8)823 (15.5)0.8Public
In preparation
MOTPP16
25. using public detections
28.8
50.5
±9.7
47.219.6% 39.4% 5,93983,694638 (11.8)823 (15.2)3.0Public
Anonymous submission
D_cost16
26. online method using public detections
46.0
39.9
±9.1
35.38.7% 50.2% 1,133107,586790 (19.3)824 (20.1)8.5Public
Anonymous submission
JCmin_MOT
27. online method using public detections
48.7
36.7
±9.1
36.27.5% 54.4% 2,936111,890667 (17.3)831 (21.5)14.8Public
M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
HDTR
28. using public detections
22.3
53.6
±8.7
46.621.2% 37.0% 4,71479,353618 (10.9)833 (14.7)3.6Public
MOTPP
29. using public detections
35.0
48.3
±8.7
45.418.6% 40.1% 7,37886,181661 (12.5)834 (15.8)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
MOTHP
30. using public detections
31.9
49.1
±9.1
46.920.0% 38.9% 9,03883,031679 (12.5)850 (15.6)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
MOTHPCLEAN
31. using public detections
27.4
50.4
±9.4
47.019.1% 39.5% 5,33284,505657 (12.2)862 (16.1)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMP16
32. using public detections
29.3
48.7
±10.3
50.115.0% 43.6% 4,11188,862535 (10.4)873 (17.0)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
eTC
33. using public detections
31.5
49.2
±9.1
56.117.3% 40.3% 8,40083,702606 (11.2)882 (16.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNet. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07258, 2018.
EAGS16
34. using public detections
31.2
47.4
±10.4
50.117.3% 42.7% 8,36986,931575 (11.0)913 (17.5)197.3Public
H. Sheng, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Chen. Enhanced Association with Supervoxels in Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In IEEE Access, 2018.
INTERA_MOT
35. using public detections
37.8
45.4
±8.6
47.718.1% 38.7% 13,40785,547600 (11.3)930 (17.5)4.3Public
L. Lan, X. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Tao, W. Gao, T. Huang. Interacting Tracklets for Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018.
LFNF16
36. using public detections
52.5
43.6
±11.0
41.613.3% 45.7% 6,61695,363836 (17.5)938 (19.7)0.6Public
Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
pairwise16
37. using public detections
27.6
50.0
±65.9
52.419.4% 38.7% 10,99579,568628 (11.1)939 (16.7)22.3Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ16
38. online method using public detections
43.3
47.0
±8.4
50.116.5% 41.8% 7,90188,179627 (12.1)945 (18.3)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
EDMT
39. using public detections
40.8
45.3
±9.1
47.917.0% 39.9% 11,12287,890639 (12.3)946 (18.3)1.8Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
LINF1
40. using public detections
48.1
41.0
±9.5
45.711.6% 51.3% 7,89699,224430 (9.4)963 (21.1)4.2Public
L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
MOT_FILTER
41. using public detections
30.7
50.2
±12.9
46.817.9% 39.7% 5,26784,812664 (12.4)978 (18.3)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
LTTSC-CRF
42. using public detections
57.7
37.6
±9.9
42.19.6% 55.2% 11,969101,343481 (10.8)1,012 (22.8)0.6Public
N. Le, A. Heili, M. Odobez. Long-Term Time-Sensitive Costs for CRF-Based Tracking by Detection. In ECCVw, 2016.
QuadMOT16
43. using public detections
51.7
44.1
±9.4
38.314.6% 44.9% 6,38894,775745 (15.5)1,096 (22.8)1.8Public
J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
JMC
44. using public detections
41.3
46.3
±9.0
46.315.5% 39.7% 6,37390,914657 (13.1)1,114 (22.2)0.8Public
S. Tang, B. Andres, M. Andriluka, B. Schiele. Multi-Person Tracking by Multicuts and Deep Matching. In BMTT, 2016.
KCF16
45. online method using public detections
41.6
48.8
±9.6
47.215.8% 38.1% 5,87586,567906 (17.3)1,116 (21.2)0.1Public
P. Chu, H. Fan, C. Tan, H. Ling. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Instance-Aware Tracker and Dynamic Model Refreshment. In WACV, 2019.
GCRA
46. using public detections
39.2
48.2
±8.3
48.612.9% 41.1% 5,10488,586821 (16.0)1,117 (21.7)2.8Public
C. Ma, C. Yang, F. Yang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, H. Jia, X. Xie. Trajectory Factory: Tracklet Cleaving and Re-connection by Deep Siamese Bi-GRU for Multiple Object Tracking. In ICME, 2018.
DD_TAMA16
47. online method using public detections
36.3
46.2
±8.4
49.414.1% 44.0% 5,12692,367598 (12.1)1,127 (22.8)6.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
MHT_ReID
48. using public detections
54.8
27.1
±47.2
36.430.6% 31.4% 13,068118,8291,071 (30.8)1,141 (32.8)0.5Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM6
49. using public detections
52.0
42.1
±9.7
47.814.9% 44.4% 11,63793,172753 (15.4)1,156 (23.6)1.8Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
CRF_RNN16
50. using public detections
28.8
49.0
±7.2
53.918.1% 35.8% 8,49583,838621 (11.5)1,252 (23.2)1.5Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
LP2D
51. using public detections
52.3
35.7
±10.1
34.28.7% 50.7% 5,084111,163915 (23.4)1,264 (32.4)49.3Public
MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
NOTA
52. using public detections
27.8
49.8
±8.3
55.317.9% 37.7% 7,24883,614614 (11.3)1,372 (25.3)19.2Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
DCCRF16
53. online method using public detections
49.9
44.8
±9.8
39.714.1% 42.3% 5,61394,133968 (20.0)1,378 (28.5)0.1Public
H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
AFN
54. using public detections
34.1
49.0
±10.2
48.219.1% 35.7% 9,50882,506899 (16.4)1,383 (25.3)0.6Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
CRF_TRACK
55. using public detections
26.7
50.3
±7.9
54.418.3% 35.7% 7,14882,746702 (12.9)1,387 (25.4)1.5Public
Anonymous submission
CRFTrack16
56. using public detections
27.3
50.3
±7.9
54.418.3% 35.7% 7,14882,746702 (12.9)1,387 (25.4)1.5Public
Anonymous submission
oICF
57. online method using public detections
50.8
43.2
±10.2
49.311.3% 48.5% 6,65196,515381 (8.1)1,404 (29.8)0.4Public
H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
TBSS
58. online method using public detections
52.2
44.6
±9.3
42.612.3% 43.9% 4,13696,128790 (16.7)1,419 (30.0)3.0Public
X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
STAM16
59. online method using public detections
49.1
46.0
±9.1
50.014.6% 43.6% 6,89591,117473 (9.5)1,422 (28.4)0.2Public
Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
Tracktor16
60. online method using public detections
29.9
54.4
±12.0
52.519.0% 36.9% 3,28079,149682 (12.1)1,480 (26.2)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
OST16
61. online method using public detections
55.6
41.5
±9.2
39.110.7% 45.6% 5,91999,7091,056 (23.3)1,487 (32.8)4.7Public
Anonymous submission
FWT
62. using public detections
41.8
47.8
±9.4
44.319.1% 38.2% 8,88685,487852 (16.0)1,534 (28.9)0.6Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
ReTrack16
63. using public detections
27.2
57.0
±12.3
54.221.9% 34.3% 4,44673,258688 (11.5)1,543 (25.8)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
MHT___ReID
64. using public detections
35.0
56.4
±11.6
54.239.7% 17.4% 23,79154,1691,478 (21.0)1,547 (22.0)0.5Public
Anonymous submission
DpTrack
65. using public detections
25.5
59.3
±18.7
52.827.4% 24.6% 8,56663,6032,045 (31.4)1,555 (23.9)10.4Public
Anonymous submission
DMAN
66. online method using public detections
39.8
46.1
±11.1
54.817.4% 42.7% 7,90989,874532 (10.5)1,616 (31.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
EAMTT_pub
67. online method using public detections
54.3
38.8
±8.5
42.47.9% 49.1% 8,114102,452965 (22.0)1,657 (37.8)11.8Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
GMMCP
68. using public detections
59.8
38.1
±7.8
35.58.6% 50.9% 6,607105,315937 (22.2)1,669 (39.5)0.5Public
A. Dehghan, S. Assari, M. Shah.. GMMCP-Tracker:Globally Optimal Generalized Maximum Multi Clique Problem for Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2015.
AMIR
69. online method using public detections
41.3
47.2
±7.7
46.314.0% 41.6% 2,68192,856774 (15.8)1,675 (34.1)1.0Public
A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
AM_ADM
70. online method using public detections
52.8
40.1
±10.1
43.87.1% 46.2% 8,50399,891789 (17.5)1,736 (38.4)5.8Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
CDA_DDALv2
71. online method using public detections
49.8
43.9
±7.8
45.110.7% 44.4% 6,45095,175676 (14.1)1,795 (37.6)0.5Public
S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
MEN
72. online method using public detections
34.9
50.0
±9.1
52.815.0% 37.0% 6,11784,271706 (13.1)1,797 (33.4)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT
73. online method using public detections
39.8
47.6
±8.2
50.915.2% 38.3% 9,25385,431792 (14.9)1,858 (35.0)20.6Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
DAST
74. online method using public detections
33.4
48.9
±8.4
53.215.2% 36.2% 9,98782,427838 (15.3)1,936 (35.3)8.7Public
Anonymous submission
AOReid
75. online method using public detections
34.8
48.2
±8.7
50.815.3% 36.8% 10,28383,301821 (15.1)1,963 (36.1)11.2Public
Anonymous submission
RAR16pub
76. online method using public detections
50.4
45.9
±9.7
48.813.2% 41.9% 6,87191,173648 (13.0)1,992 (39.8)0.9Public
K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
SRPN16
77. online method using public detections
45.6
48.2
±8.5
51.314.2% 36.8% 7,76785,973790 (14.9)2,006 (38.0)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
SCNet
78. online method using public detections
45.9
48.8
±8.8
51.515.4% 33.5% 11,66680,725891 (16.0)2,100 (37.7)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
OVBT
79. online method using public detections
68.8
38.4
±8.8
37.87.5% 47.3% 11,51799,4631,321 (29.1)2,140 (47.1)0.3Public
Y. Ban, S. Ba, X. Alameda-Pineda, R. Horaud. Tracking Multiple Persons Based on a Variational Bayesian Model. In BMTT 2016, .
HISP_DAL
80. online method using public detections
59.2
37.4
±8.8
30.57.6% 50.9% 3,222108,8652,101 (52.1)2,151 (53.4)3.3Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
UTA
81. online method using public detections
35.7
50.6
±7.9
50.418.3% 33.5% 7,75281,584722 (13.1)2,196 (39.7)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
CppSORT
82. online method using public detections
55.9
31.5
±9.0
27.74.3% 59.9% 3,048120,2781,587 (46.6)2,239 (65.8)687.1Public
S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
RTT
83. online method using public detections
40.6
49.9
±8.0
49.319.0% 32.8% 9,92780,406955 (17.1)2,247 (40.2)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
TBD
84. using public detections
69.8
33.7
±9.2
0.07.2% 54.2% 5,804112,5872,418 (63.2)2,252 (58.9)1.3Public
A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
HISP_T
85. online method using public detections
61.3
35.9
±8.5
28.97.8% 50.1% 6,412107,9182,594 (63.6)2,298 (56.3)4.8Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
LSST16O
86. online method using public detections
38.4
49.2
±10.2
56.513.4% 41.4% 7,18784,875606 (11.3)2,497 (46.7)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
DCOR
87. online method using public detections
56.0
28.3
±9.0
21.73.4% 63.9% 1,618128,345849 (28.7)2,592 (87.5)32.9Public
Anonymous submission
JCSTD
88. online method using public detections
46.1
47.4
±8.3
41.114.4% 36.4% 8,07686,6381,266 (24.1)2,697 (51.4)8.8Public
W. Tian, M. Lauer, L. Chen. Online Multi-Object Tracking Using Joint Domain Information in Traffic Scenarios. In IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019.
DS_v2
89. using public detections
21.9
59.3
±12.9
57.524.2% 29.1% 7,46565,810887 (13.9)2,738 (42.8)39.4Public
Anonymous submission
PMPTracker
90. online method using public detections
58.4
40.3
±11.7
38.210.4% 42.0% 10,07197,5241,343 (28.9)2,764 (59.4)148.0Public
Light version of PTZ camera Mutiple People Tracker
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
PV
91. online method using public detections
39.0
50.4
±10.1
50.814.9% 38.9% 2,60086,7801,061 (20.2)3,181 (60.7)7.3Public
Anonymous submission
MTDF
92. online method using public detections
54.9
45.7
±11.2
40.114.1% 36.4% 12,01884,9701,987 (37.2)3,377 (63.2)1.5Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
RNN_A_P
93. online method using public detections
66.2
34.0
±8.6
33.77.9% 51.0% 8,562109,2692,479 (61.9)3,393 (84.7)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_N1T
94. online method using public detections
61.2
33.3
±8.9
25.55.5% 56.0% 1,750116,4523,499 (96.8)3,594 (99.5)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
PHD_GSDL16
95. online method using public detections
56.4
41.0
±8.9
43.111.3% 41.5% 6,49899,2571,810 (39.7)3,650 (80.1)8.3Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
PHD_T
96. online method using public detections new
61.8
37.1
±8.7
39.410.1% 45.7% 6,679104,8943,095 (72.9)3,671 (86.4)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
MTT_TPR
97. using public detections
30.4
54.9
±11.7
53.118.7% 34.8% 4,13076,6731,447 (25.0)3,693 (63.7)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_e17
98. online method using public detections
63.3
33.8
±8.9
25.36.3% 54.9% 1,766115,1303,778 (102.5)3,874 (105.1)3.3Public
Anonymous submission
SMOT
99. using public detections
78.1
29.7
±7.3
0.05.3% 47.7% 17,426107,5523,108 (75.8)4,483 (109.3)0.2Public
C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
retrack
100. online method using public detections
52.1
26.2
±13.2
31.017.4% 26.6% 52,61078,8453,042 (53.6)4,835 (85.2)22.3Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw. FragHzDetector
GM_PHD_DAL
101. online method using public detections
61.8
35.1
±9.1
26.67.0% 51.4% 2,350111,8864,047 (104.8)5,338 (138.2)3.5Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GM_PHD_Dl
102. online method using public detections
62.8
34.3
±9.1
20.57.1% 51.5% 2,350111,8865,605 (145.1)5,357 (138.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission

Due to a minor bug in the export script, all results were re-evaluated on April 11, 2016. Here is the old snapshot of the leaderboard.


Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
75919759182326

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT16-03

MOT16-03

(51.9% MOTA)

MOT16-06

MOT16-06

(45.0% MOTA)

MOT16-07

MOT16-07

(38.9% MOTA)

...

...

MOT16-08

MOT16-08

(30.0% MOTA)

MOT16-14

MOT16-14

(24.8% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.