MOT16 Results

Download all results for this benchmark

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.

Showing only entries that use public detections!

Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
DP_NMS 1.	42.2	26.2 ±9.3	31.2	4.1%	67.5%	3,689	130,557	365 (12.9)	638 (22.5)	5.9	Public
	H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
JPDA_m 2.	43.8	26.2 ±6.1	0.0	4.1%	67.5%	3,689	130,549	365 (12.9)	638 (22.5)	22.2	Public
	H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
DCOR 3.	49.5	28.3 ±9.0	21.7	3.4%	63.9%	1,618	128,345	849 (28.7)	2,592 (87.5)	32.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
GCK 4.	56.7	28.7 ±8.5	30.6	3.4%	51.0%	21,436	106,424	2,217 (53.3)	3,277 (78.7)	25.1	Public
	Anonymous submission
SMOT 5.	67.9	29.7 ±7.3	0.0	5.3%	47.7%	17,426	107,552	3,108 (75.8)	4,483 (109.3)	0.2	Public
	C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
GMPHD_HDA 6.	43.6	30.5 ±6.9	33.4	4.6%	59.7%	5,169	120,970	539 (16.0)	731 (21.7)	13.6	Public
	Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
CppSORT 7.	49.3	31.5 ±9.0	27.7	4.3%	59.9%	3,048	120,278	1,587 (46.6)	2,239 (65.8)	687.1	Public
	S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
CEM 8.	49.1	33.2 ±7.9	0.0	7.8%	54.4%	6,837	114,322	642 (17.2)	731 (19.6)	0.3	Public
	A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
GM_PHD_N1T 9.	53.6	33.3 ±8.9	25.5	5.5%	56.0%	1,750	116,452	3,499 (96.8)	3,594 (99.5)	9.9	Public
	N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
TBD 10.	60.4	33.7 ±9.2	0.0	7.2%	54.2%	5,804	112,587	2,418 (63.2)	2,252 (58.9)	1.3	Public
	A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
GM_PHD_e17 11.	55.6	33.8 ±8.9	25.3	6.3%	54.9%	1,766	115,130	3,778 (102.5)	3,874 (105.1)	3.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
TDP 12.	49.3	33.9 ±10.2	40.4	6.2%	62.2%	6,709	113,249	480 (12.7)	1,105 (29.2)	9.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
RNN_A_P 13.	57.3	34.0 ±8.6	33.7	7.9%	51.0%	8,562	109,269	2,479 (61.9)	3,393 (84.7)	19.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_Dl 14.	54.7	34.3 ±9.1	20.5	7.1%	51.5%	2,350	111,886	5,605 (145.1)	5,357 (138.7)	3.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
DRT 15.	44.5	34.7 ±11.4	41.1	6.3%	61.8%	6,992	111,617	460 (11.9)	1,127 (29.1)	6.2	Public
	Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_DAL 16.	53.7	35.1 ±9.1	26.6	7.0%	51.4%	2,350	111,886	4,047 (104.8)	5,338 (138.2)	3.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
cm_test 17.	43.6	35.4 ±20.2	40.3	6.5%	71.4%	4,427	112,889	402 (10.6)	1,176 (30.9)	1.6	Public
	Anonymous submission
LP2D 18.	45.1	35.7 ±10.1	34.2	8.7%	50.7%	5,084	111,163	915 (23.4)	1,264 (32.4)	49.3	Public
	MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
HISP_T 19.	52.6	35.9 ±8.5	28.9	7.8%	50.1%	6,412	107,918	2,594 (63.6)	2,298 (56.3)	4.8	Public
	N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
JCmin_MOT 20.	41.9	36.7 ±9.1	36.2	7.5%	54.4%	2,936	111,890	667 (17.3)	831 (21.5)	14.8	Public
	M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
HISP_T2 21.	50.3	37.2 ±8.6	29.7	7.6%	50.7%	3,323	108,859	2,370 (58.8)	2,234 (55.4)	4.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
LTTSC-CRF 22.	49.3	37.6 ±9.9	42.1	9.6%	55.2%	11,969	101,343	481 (10.8)	1,012 (22.8)	0.6	Public
	N. Le, A. Heili, M. Odobez. Long-Term Time-Sensitive Costs for CRF-Based Tracking by Detection. In ECCVw, 2016.
YT16 23.	51.7	37.8 ±8.8	31.1	8.8%	46.1%	4,384	106,365	2,655 (63.7)	2,750 (66.0)	12.1	Public
	Anonymous submission
GMMCP 24.	50.8	38.1 ±7.8	35.5	8.6%	50.9%	6,607	105,315	937 (22.2)	1,669 (39.5)	0.5	Public
	A. Dehghan, S. Assari, M. Shah.. GMMCP-Tracker:Globally Optimal Generalized Maximum Multi Clique Problem for Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2015.
HAM_ACT16 25.	39.4	38.1 ±8.2	43.3	7.8%	54.4%	6,976	105,434	418 (9.9)	707 (16.8)	8.0	Public
OVBT 26.	58.5	38.4 ±8.8	37.8	7.5%	47.3%	11,517	99,463	1,321 (29.1)	2,140 (47.1)	0.3	Public
	Y. Ban, S. Ba, X. Alameda-Pineda, R. Horaud. Tracking Multiple Persons Based on a Variational Bayesian Model. In BMTT 2016, .
EAMTT_pub 27.	45.1	38.8 ±8.5	42.4	7.9%	49.1%	8,114	102,452	965 (22.0)	1,657 (37.8)	11.8	Public
	R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
TST_PLS 28.	51.8	39.7 ±11.1	43.3	6.7%	47.4%	8,447	100,728	783 (17.5)	1,730 (38.7)	4.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
D_cost16 29.	38.0	39.9 ±9.1	35.3	8.7%	50.2%	1,133	107,586	790 (19.3)	824 (20.1)	8.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
AM_ADM 30.	43.7	40.1 ±10.1	43.8	7.1%	46.2%	8,503	99,891	789 (17.5)	1,736 (38.4)	5.8	Public
	S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
PMPTracker 31.	49.1	40.3 ±11.7	38.2	10.4%	42.0%	10,071	97,524	1,343 (28.9)	2,764 (59.4)	148.0	Public
	Light version of PTZ camera Mutiple People Tracker
PHD_GSDL16 32.	46.8	41.0 ±8.9	43.1	11.3%	41.5%	6,498	99,257	1,810 (39.7)	3,650 (80.1)	8.3	Public
	Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
LINF1 33.	40.4	41.0 ±9.5	45.7	11.6%	51.3%	7,896	99,224	430 (9.4)	963 (21.1)	4.2	Public
	L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
MHT_bLSTM6 34.	42.8	42.1 ±9.7	47.8	14.9%	44.4%	11,637	93,172	753 (15.4)	1,156 (23.6)	1.8	Public
	C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
oICF 35.	42.3	43.2 ±10.2	49.3	11.3%	48.5%	6,651	96,515	381 (8.1)	1,404 (29.8)	0.4	Public
	H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
LFNF16 36.	43.8	43.6 ±11.0	41.6	13.3%	45.7%	6,616	95,363	836 (17.5)	938 (19.7)	0.6	Public
	Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
CSAHD 37.	40.6	43.7 ±11.6	45.7	10.5%	46.1%	8,318	93,273	984 (20.1)	2,164 (44.3)	23.2	Public
	Anonymous submission
CDA_DDALv2 38.	41.1	43.9 ±7.8	45.1	10.7%	44.4%	6,450	95,175	676 (14.1)	1,795 (37.6)	0.5	Public
	S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
QuadMOT16 39.	42.2	44.1 ±9.4	38.3	14.6%	44.9%	6,388	94,775	745 (15.5)	1,096 (22.8)	1.8	Public
	J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
TBSS 40.	42.8	44.6 ±9.3	42.6	12.3%	43.9%	4,136	96,128	790 (16.7)	1,419 (30.0)	3.0	Public
	X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
DCCRF16 41.	41.6	44.8 ±9.8	39.7	14.1%	42.3%	5,613	94,133	968 (20.0)	1,378 (28.5)	0.1	Public
	H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
EDMT 42.	32.4	45.3 ±9.1	47.9	17.0%	39.9%	11,122	87,890	639 (12.3)	946 (18.3)	1.8	Public
	J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
INTERA_MOT 43.	30.3	45.4 ±8.6	47.7	18.1%	38.7%	13,407	85,547	600 (11.3)	930 (17.5)	4.3	Public
	L. Lan, X. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Tao, W. Gao, T. Huang. Interacting Tracklets for Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018.
TBNMF16 44.	36.3	45.6 ±8.9	46.0	13.4%	43.5%	4,230	94,435	584 (12.1)	1,229 (25.5)	7.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
MTDF 45.	45.0	45.7 ±11.2	40.1	14.1%	36.4%	12,018	84,970	1,987 (37.2)	3,377 (63.2)	1.5	Public
	Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
MHT_DAM 46.	34.2	45.8 ±8.9	46.1	16.2%	43.2%	6,412	91,758	590 (11.9)	781 (15.7)	0.8	Public
	C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
RAR16pub 47.	41.0	45.9 ±9.7	48.8	13.2%	41.9%	6,871	91,173	648 (13.0)	1,992 (39.8)	0.9	Public
	K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
deepS2 48.	31.4	46.0 ±8.2	46.5	15.5%	42.6%	5,124	92,697	693 (14.1)	759 (15.4)	0.7	Public
	ID 32
STAM16 49.	40.2	46.0 ±9.1	50.0	14.6%	43.6%	6,895	91,117	473 (9.5)	1,422 (28.4)	0.2	Public
	Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
DMMOT 50.	32.1	46.1 ±11.1	54.8	17.4%	42.7%	7,909	89,874	532 (10.5)	1,616 (31.9)	0.3	Public
	J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
JMC 51.	33.1	46.3 ±9.0	46.3	15.5%	39.7%	6,373	90,914	657 (13.1)	1,114 (22.2)	0.8	Public
	S. Tang, B. Andres, M. Andriluka, B. Schiele. Multi-Person Tracking by Multicuts and Deep Matching. In BMTT, 2016.
NOMT 52.	26.3	46.4 ±9.9	53.3	18.3%	41.4%	9,753	87,565	359 (6.9)	504 (9.7)	2.6	Public
	W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
MCjoint 53.	27.8	47.1 ±10.8	52.3	20.4%	46.9%	6,703	89,368	370 (7.3)	598 (11.7)	0.6	Public
	}@article{DBLP:journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16, author = {Margret Keuper and Siyu Tang and Zhongjie Yu and Bjoern Andres and Thomas Brox and Bernt Schiele}, title = {A Multi-cut Formulation for Joint Segmentation and Tracking of Multiple Objects}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1607.06317}, year = {2016}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06317}, timestamp = {Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:41:31 +0200}, biburl = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bib/journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org} }
AMIR 54.	32.2	47.2 ±7.7	46.3	14.0%	41.6%	2,681	92,856	774 (15.8)	1,675 (34.1)	1.0	Public
	A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
eHAF16 55.	28.5	47.2 ±16.8	52.4	18.6%	42.8%	12,586	83,107	542 (10.0)	787 (14.5)	0.5	Public
	H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
ASTT 56.	29.1	47.2 ±9.6	44.3	16.3%	41.6%	4,680	90,877	633 (12.6)	814 (16.2)	0.5	Public
	Yi Tao el al., “Adaptive Spatio-temporal Model Based Multiple Object Tracking Considering a Moving Camera[C]”, International Conference on Universal Village (UV), 2018.
JCSTD 57.	37.6	47.4 ±8.3	41.1	14.4%	36.4%	8,076	86,638	1,266 (24.1)	2,697 (51.4)	8.8	Public
	W. Tian, M. Lauer, L. Chen. Online Multi-Object Tracking Using Joint Domain Information in Traffic Scenarios. In IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019.
EAGS16 58.	24.6	47.4 ±10.4	50.1	17.3%	42.7%	8,369	86,931	575 (11.0)	913 (17.5)	197.3	Public
	H. Sheng, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Chen. Enhanced Association with Supervoxels in Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In IEEE Access, 2018.
NLLMPa 59.	27.1	47.6 ±10.6	47.3	17.0%	40.4%	5,844	89,093	629 (12.3)	768 (15.0)	8.3	Public
	E. Levinkov, J. Uhrig, S. Tang, M. Omran, E. Insafutdinov, A. Kirillov, C. Rother, T. Brox, B. Schiele, B. Andres. Joint Graph Decomposition and Node Labeling: Problem, Algorithms, Applications. In CVPR, 2017.
MOTDT 60.	31.8	47.6 ±8.2	50.9	15.2%	38.3%	9,253	85,431	792 (14.9)	1,858 (35.0)	20.6	Public
	C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
FWT 61.	34.0	47.8 ±9.4	44.3	19.1%	38.2%	8,886	85,487	852 (16.0)	1,534 (28.9)	0.6	Public
	R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
CMT16 62.	21.3	48.1 ±9.0	56.6	15.7%	46.2%	7,758	86,501	381 (7.2)	615 (11.7)	6.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
TripT 63.	31.3	48.1 ±8.5	51.9	15.8%	40.2%	2,827	91,210	563 (11.3)	1,143 (22.9)	0.6	Public
	Anonymous submission
SRPN16 64.	35.8	48.2 ±8.5	51.3	14.2%	36.8%	7,767	85,973	790 (14.9)	2,006 (38.0)	1.4	Public
	Anonymous submission
GCRA 65.	31.0	48.2 ±8.3	48.6	12.9%	41.1%	5,104	88,586	821 (16.0)	1,117 (21.7)	2.8	Public
	C. Ma, C. Yang, F. Yang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, H. Jia, X. Xie. Trajectory Factory: Tracklet Cleaving and Re-connection by Deep Siamese Bi-GRU for Multiple Object Tracking. In ICME, 2018.
DAST 66.	29.3	48.2 ±8.3	50.7	14.1%	37.2%	8,869	84,784	838 (15.7)	2,028 (37.9)	8.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
TSN 67.	33.0	48.2 ±8.7	45.7	19.9%	38.9%	8,447	85,315	665 (12.5)	829 (15.6)	0.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
AOReid 68.	26.3	48.2 ±8.7	50.8	15.3%	36.8%	10,283	83,301	821 (15.1)	1,963 (36.1)	11.2	Public
	Anonymous submission
TripBFT 69.	30.5	48.3 ±8.1	50.9	15.4%	40.1%	2,706	91,047	543 (10.8)	896 (17.9)	0.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
TLMHT 70.	26.8	48.7 ±8.6	55.3	15.7%	44.5%	6,632	86,504	413 (7.9)	642 (12.2)	4.8	Public
	H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
DeepMP16 71.	21.9	48.7 ±10.3	50.1	15.0%	43.6%	4,111	88,862	535 (10.4)	873 (17.0)	9.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
LMP 72.	24.7	48.8 ±9.8	51.3	18.2%	40.1%	6,654	86,245	481 (9.1)	595 (11.3)	0.5	Public
	S. Tang, M. Andriluka, B. Andres, B. Schiele. Multiple People Tracking with Lifted Multicut and Person Re-identification. In CVPR, 2017.
KCF16 73.	33.1	48.8 ±9.6	47.2	15.8%	38.1%	5,875	86,567	906 (17.3)	1,116 (21.2)	0.1	Public
	P. Chu, H. Fan, C. Tan, H. Ling. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Instance-Aware Tracker and Dynamic Model Refreshment. In WACV, 2019.
CRF_RNN16 74.	22.9	49.0 ±7.2	53.9	18.1%	35.8%	8,495	83,838	621 (11.5)	1,252 (23.2)	1.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
AFN 75.	27.2	49.0 ±10.2	48.2	19.1%	35.7%	9,508	82,506	899 (16.4)	1,383 (25.3)	0.6	Public
	H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
eTC 76.	24.7	49.2 ±9.1	56.1	17.3%	40.3%	8,400	83,702	606 (11.2)	882 (16.3)	0.7	Public
	G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNet. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07258, 2018.
LSST16O 77.	31.5	49.2 ±10.2	56.5	13.4%	41.4%	7,187	84,875	606 (11.3)	2,497 (46.7)	2.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
HCC 78.	21.1	49.3 ±10.2	50.7	17.8%	39.9%	5,333	86,795	391 (7.5)	535 (10.2)	0.8	Public
	L. Ma, S. Tang, M. Black, L. Gool. Customized Multi-Person Tracker. In Computer Vision -- ACCV 2018, 2018.
STCG 79.	22.9	49.3 ±8.6	52.0	16.2%	41.4%	6,886	84,979	515 (9.6)	775 (14.5)	22.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
siameseCos 80.	26.7	49.4 ±8.4	49.8	19.1%	39.4%	6,281	85,384	679 (12.8)	823 (15.5)	0.8	Public
	In preparation
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
TAR 81.	35.3	49.4 ±8.1	40.0	18.4%	30.6%	11,220	79,839	1,180 (21.0)	2,052 (36.5)	5.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
PDetTracId 82.	33.3	49.7 ±9.4	46.8	16.7%	37.3%	4,393	86,241	1,040 (19.7)	3,652 (69.3)	2.4	Public
	Anonymous submission
NOTA 83.	21.9	49.8 ±8.3	55.3	17.9%	37.7%	7,248	83,614	614 (11.3)	1,372 (25.3)	19.2	Public
	Anonymous submission
RTT 84.	35.5	50.0 ±8.0	39.5	17.3%	34.0%	7,061	82,900	1,152 (21.1)	2,237 (41.0)	1.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
MEN 85.	26.9	50.0 ±9.1	52.8	15.0%	37.0%	6,117	84,271	706 (13.1)	1,797 (33.4)	2.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
PV 86.	30.9	50.4 ±10.1	50.8	14.9%	38.9%	2,600	86,780	1,061 (20.2)	3,181 (60.7)	7.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
TPM 87.	24.1	51.3 ±9.3	47.9	18.7%	40.8%	2,701	85,504	569 (10.7)	707 (13.3)	0.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
HDTR 88.	18.3	53.6 ±8.7	46.6	21.2%	37.0%	4,714	79,353	618 (10.9)	833 (14.7)	3.6	Public
MTT_TPR 89.	24.8	54.9 ±11.7	53.1	18.7%	34.8%	4,130	76,673	1,447 (25.0)	3,693 (63.7)	6.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
DS_v2 90.	18.9	59.3 ±12.9	57.5	24.2%	29.1%	7,465	65,810	887 (13.9)	2,738 (42.8)	39.4	Public
	Anonymous submission

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT16-03

(53.0% MOTA)

MOT16-06

(44.3% MOTA)

MOT16-07

(38.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT16-08

(29.8% MOTA)

MOT16-14

(24.1% MOTA)