MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ISDH_HDAv2
1. online method using public detections
39.5
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
MPNTrack17
2. using public detections
26.5
55.7
±13.2
59.127.2% 34.4% 25,013223,5311,433 (23.7)3,122 (51.7)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
MFT
3. online method using public detections
61.3
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17
4. using public detections
39.4
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
cnt_klt
5. using public detections
31.6
48.0
±11.8
57.819.0% 31.6% 63,207228,7831,215 (20.4)4,134 (69.5)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
GMOT
6. using public detections
19.3
55.4
±12.2
57.922.7% 34.7% 20,608229,5111,403 (23.7)2,765 (46.6)5.9Public
LXD, KHW @ HRI-SH
SCNet
7. online method using public detections
49.1
53.2
±15.4
54.920.0% 32.1% 30,440231,1092,621 (44.4)6,031 (102.2)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
JBNOT
8. using public detections
45.6
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
MOT_TBC
9. using public detections
44.3
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
eTC17
10. using public detections
38.8
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the connectivity: Multi-object tracking with trackletnet. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
overlap
11. using public detections
33.4
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
TT17
12. using public detections
31.2
54.9
±12.8
63.124.4% 38.1% 20,236233,2951,088 (18.5)2,392 (40.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
13. using public detections
33.8
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
ReTracktor
14. using public detections
36.6
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TAR_1
15. online method using public detections
57.8
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
SMOT_no
16. online method using public detections
48.8
52.9
±12.3
54.118.7% 32.8% 26,703236,3462,702 (46.5)6,340 (109.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
eHAF17
17. using public detections
39.6
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
IDGA
18. using public detections
29.4
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
ENFT17
19. using public detections
33.0
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
YoloSort
20. online method using public detections
79.6
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HTBT
21. using public detections
40.1
52.3
±13.3
54.522.5% 36.4% 28,743238,2681,959 (33.9)2,973 (51.5)0.4Public
Anonymous submission
UTA
22. online method using public detections
44.3
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
MMHT17
23. online method using public detections
38.1
52.8
±12.9
53.320.3% 37.5% 25,401238,4132,596 (45.0)4,103 (71.1)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
HDTR
24. using public detections
30.4
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
TLO_MHT
25. online method using public detections
42.9
52.9
±12.9
53.320.1% 37.6% 24,142238,8342,565 (44.5)4,101 (71.1)20.7Public
Anonymous submission
SMOTe
26. online method using public detections
54.9
52.1
±12.1
53.818.4% 33.3% 27,571239,7242,691 (46.8)6,134 (106.7)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
27. using public detections
37.3
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
AReid17
28. online method using public detections
39.8
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
TOPA
29. online method using public detections
44.2
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
MTDF17
30. online method using public detections
71.3
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
STCG17
31. using public detections
40.6
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17O
32. online method using public detections
46.9
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
TPM
33. using public detections
37.7
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
SNet_pub
34. online method using public detections
53.8
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
DGCT
35. using public detections
31.3
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
YOONKJ17
36. online method using public detections
49.6
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
baitrack
37. using public detections
68.0
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
TTL
38. online method using public detections
49.2
52.3
±12.9
51.319.3% 38.2% 21,617244,5012,779 (49.0)4,290 (75.7)21.5Public
Anonymous submission
TLO17
39. online method using public detections
43.0
52.6
±12.9
51.319.5% 38.2% 20,089244,9302,530 (44.7)4,170 (73.7)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
OMHT
40. online method using public detections
40.3
52.6
±12.9
51.919.3% 38.0% 20,153244,9982,552 (45.1)4,148 (73.3)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
PointMOT17
41. using public detections
45.9
52.2
±13.3
50.822.4% 40.0% 22,012245,2772,134 (37.8)2,652 (46.9)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
PP17
42. using public detections
45.7
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,183245,9982,215 (39.3)2,752 (48.8)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
43. using public detections
71.1
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT
44. using public detections
46.2
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,176246,1582,224 (39.5)2,769 (49.1)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
MOTPP17
45. using public detections
36.2
52.4
±15.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 19,922246,1832,223 (39.4)2,769 (49.1)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
PV
46. online method using public detections
50.0
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
TppNoFPN
47. using public detections
52.1
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
EDMT17
48. using public detections
49.4
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
MOT_AF
49. online method using public detections
30.6
53.5
±13.4
55.619.2% 37.6% 12,867247,8161,672 (29.8)3,516 (62.7)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
jCC
50. using public detections
42.5
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ReID_Seq
51. online method using public detections
47.3
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
FWT
52. using public detections
49.3
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
Tracktor17
53. online method using public detections
45.8
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
AFN17
54. using public detections
44.0
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
STRN_MOT17
55. online method using public detections
52.0
50.9
±11.6
56.018.9% 33.8% 25,295249,3652,397 (43.0)9,363 (167.8)13.8Public
J. Xu, Y. Cao, Z. Zhang, H. Hu. Spatial-Temporal Relation Networks for Multi-Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
MOTF17
56. using public detections
49.8
52.0
±13.2
50.520.1% 40.4% 19,222249,4642,293 (41.1)3,297 (59.1)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
LSMT
57. online method using public detections
41.8
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT17
58. online method using public detections
48.0
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
PPMOT17
59. using public detections
45.0
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN
60. online method using public detections
79.5
47.8
±13.2
41.417.0% 41.7% 38,279251,9894,325 (78.2)5,355 (96.8)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
NOTA
61. using public detections
44.7
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
SRPN17
62. online method using public detections
55.6
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_DAM
63. using public detections
51.5
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
DEEP_TAMA
64. online method using public detections
47.6
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
Q_ls
65. online method using public detections
67.2
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
66. online method using public detections
42.7
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOT17ZH
67. online method using public detections
52.7
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
FAMNet
68. online method using public detections
48.6
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
TTracker
69. online method using public detections
69.1
46.2
±14.0
44.021.0% 35.6% 44,854254,4384,258 (77.6)6,307 (114.9)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
TLMHT
70. using public detections
53.8
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SOTD_MC
71. online method using public detections
57.3
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHDOGM17
72. online method using public detections
48.4
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In IEEE Access, 2019.
DeepMP17
73. using public detections
43.8
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
PHD_GM
74. online method using public detections
62.9
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
OST
75. using public detections
61.4
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
2MPT
76. using public detections
52.0
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
SiaIOU
77. using public detections
64.3
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
JOINT_TRAC
78. using public detections
90.1
29.4
±17.6
34.512.6% 42.3% 132,192260,8085,397 (100.4)10,704 (199.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_Rd17
79. online method using public detections
63.5
46.3
±14.7
50.819.0% 33.8% 37,249260,8714,742 (88.2)8,636 (160.6)20.1Public
Anonymous submission
ResTestV2
80. using public detections
90.1
40.0
±16.7
36.912.1% 39.5% 71,781261,0725,718 (106.4)9,675 (180.1)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
KVIOU
81. online method using public detections
72.7
46.6
±14.2
44.017.3% 38.1% 34,838262,0084,379 (81.8)7,844 (146.4)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
AEb
82. using public detections
36.0
49.5
±13.6
52.020.8% 38.9% 20,822262,2381,779 (33.2)4,792 (89.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMOTRPN
83. online method using public detections
65.0
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
DualAtte
84. online method using public detections
67.8
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
RFTracking
85. online method using public detections new
63.2
48.5
±14.8
43.617.7% 39.0% 24,544262,7653,160 (59.1)5,097 (95.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
LT17
86. online method using public detections
70.5
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
DMAN
87. online method using public detections
55.3
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
Lab031
88. using public detections
70.6
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM17
89. online method using public detections
57.4
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
TPbase17
90. online method using public detections
81.8
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
PHD_GSDL17
91. online method using public detections
67.4
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
JDT
92. online method using public detections
61.8
47.4
±12.2
50.116.8% 37.2% 26,910267,3312,760 (52.5)6,211 (118.0)35.1Public
Anonymous submission
DAM_MOT
93. online method using public detections
52.3
47.0
±12.6
48.716.9% 38.1% 28,933267,8962,140 (40.7)2,756 (52.5)18.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
MHT_bLSTM
94. using public detections
61.7
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
OTCD_1
95. online method using public detections
65.6
48.6
±13.7
47.916.2% 41.2% 18,499268,2043,502 (66.7)5,588 (106.5)15.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
RegTL
96. using public detections
65.0
48.1
±13.7
41.618.1% 39.8% 20,850268,3633,386 (64.6)4,524 (86.3)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_SADF17
97. online method using public detections
55.2
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
MASS
98. online method using public detections
71.8
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
FPSN
99. online method using public detections
76.3
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
MOTbyReID
100. online method using public detections
87.9
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SNM17
101. online method using public detections
83.7
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
E2EM
102. online method using public detections
61.9
47.5
±14.5
48.816.5% 37.5% 20,655272,1873,632 (70.2)12,712 (245.6)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_LMP
103. online method using public detections
77.8
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
zxbtk17
104. online method using public detections
77.7
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
QiMOT
105. online method using public detections
78.8
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
dcor
106. online method using public detections
75.8
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_ReID7
107. using public detections
75.9
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
HISP_T17
108. online method using public detections
84.0
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
Alex
109. online method using public detections
70.2
47.6
±14.2
49.813.2% 41.4% 16,028277,1102,731 (53.7)8,481 (166.7)0.2Public
Anonymous submission
GF
110. online method using public detections
78.1
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HISP_DAL17
111. online method using public detections
81.8
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
EDA_GNN
112. online method using public detections
71.0
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
Umot
113. online method using public detections
91.4
43.9
±13.8
37.815.2% 38.9% 28,596278,6219,363 (185.0)11,371 (224.6)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
GOTURN_3B
114. online method using public detections
81.5
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
IOU17
115. using public detections
72.8
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
GoturnM17
116. online method using public detections
99.4
38.3
±9.0
25.79.4% 47.1% 55,381282,67010,328 (207.0)9,849 (197.4)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
DCORV2
117. online method using public detections
71.9
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
AEb_O
118. online method using public detections
63.9
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_DAL
119. online method using public detections
84.7
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GM_PHD_D
120. online method using public detections
83.0
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
DAN__test
121. using public detections
91.4
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
122. using public detections
67.9
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
GMPHD_KCF
123. online method using public detections
98.5
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
ZM
124. online method using public detections
93.3
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
ms_dh
125. online method using public detections
96.8
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
DSA_MOT17
126. online method using public detections
62.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
TM_track
127. online method using public detections
105.3
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
SORT17
128. online method using public detections
88.5
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
GMPHD_SHA
129. online method using public detections
82.6
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
EAMTT
130. online method using public detections
84.1
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
cascademot
131. online method using public detections
85.3
41.8
±16.0
34.215.2% 38.7% 27,816288,76811,535 (236.3)14,800 (303.2)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
c3d_Track
132. online method using public detections
88.0
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
XYHv2
133. online method using public detections
106.5
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
134. online method using public detections
87.6
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_N1Tr
135. online method using public detections
88.2
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
98K
136. using public detections
74.5
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
OLGT_new
137. online method using public detections
67.6
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
138. online method using public detections
54.0
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
D_SST_V1
139. online method using public detections
86.8
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
CGHA_MOT
140. online method using public detections
89.5
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFP FNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GNNMOT
141. online method using public detections
78.9
42.0
±12.8
29.312.0% 50.0% 23,294299,6944,377 (93.4)3,847 (82.1)177.6Public
Anonymous submission
CASC_MOT
142. online method using public detections
81.9
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
GLMBS3
143. using public detections
95.0
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
CTRACKER
144. online method using public detections
83.6
39.4
±13.5
26.113.4% 42.5% 16,249307,90017,592 (387.2)14,508 (319.3)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
wangs
145. online method using public detections new
93.5
40.1
±14.0
31.313.4% 42.5% 16,252307,90313,760 (302.9)14,419 (317.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
146. online method using public detections
90.5
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
MOT_BJ
147. online method using public detections
111.5
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.8% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(58.2% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(49.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(19.4% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(18.7% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.