MOT17 Results

Download all results for this benchmark

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOT_BJ
1. online method using public detections 		111.5
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission
baitrack
2. using public detections 		68.0
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
XYHv2
3. online method using public detections 		106.5
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
GoturnM17
4. online method using public detections 		99.4
38.3
±9.0
25.79.4% 47.1% 55,381282,67010,328 (207.0)9,849 (197.4)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
CTRACKER
5. online method using public detections 		83.6
39.4
±13.5
26.113.4% 42.5% 16,249307,90017,592 (387.2)14,508 (319.3)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
GNNMOT
6. online method using public detections 		78.9
42.0
±12.8
29.312.0% 50.0% 23,294299,6944,377 (93.4)3,847 (82.1)177.6Public
Anonymous submission
wangs
7. online method using public detections new 		93.5
40.1
±14.0
31.313.4% 42.5% 16,252307,90313,760 (302.9)14,419 (317.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
GLMBS3
8. using public detections 		95.0
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
ZM
9. online method using public detections 		93.3
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
TM_track
10. online method using public detections 		105.3
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GM_PHD
11. online method using public detections 		87.6
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_N1Tr
12. online method using public detections 		88.2
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
GM_PHD
13. online method using public detections 		90.5
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
dcor
14. online method using public detections 		75.8
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
cascademot
15. online method using public detections 		85.3
41.8
±16.0
34.215.2% 38.7% 27,816288,76811,535 (236.3)14,800 (303.2)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_D
16. online method using public detections 		83.0
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
JOINT_TRAC
17. using public detections 		90.1
29.4
±17.6
34.512.6% 42.3% 132,192260,8085,397 (100.4)10,704 (199.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DCORV2
18. online method using public detections 		71.9
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_DAL
19. online method using public detections 		84.7
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GMPHD_KCF
20. online method using public detections 		98.5
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ResTestV2
21. using public detections 		90.1
40.0
±16.7
36.912.1% 39.5% 71,781261,0725,718 (106.4)9,675 (180.1)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
98K
22. using public detections 		74.5
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
MOTbyReID
23. online method using public detections 		87.9
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
Umot
24. online method using public detections 		91.4
43.9
±13.8
37.815.2% 38.9% 28,596278,6219,363 (185.0)11,371 (224.6)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
GOTURN_3B
25. online method using public detections 		81.5
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
HISP_T17
26. online method using public detections 		84.0
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
GF
27. online method using public detections 		78.1
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_SHA
28. online method using public detections 		82.6
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
IOU17
29. using public detections 		72.8
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
SORT17
30. online method using public detections 		88.5
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HISP_DAL17
31. online method using public detections 		81.8
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
zxbtk17
32. online method using public detections 		77.7
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
ms_dh
33. online method using public detections 		96.8
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
c3d_Track
34. online method using public detections 		88.0
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
EDA_GNN
35. online method using public detections 		71.0
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
QiMOT
36. online method using public detections 		78.8
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN
37. online method using public detections 		79.5
47.8
±13.2
41.417.0% 41.7% 38,279251,9894,325 (78.2)5,355 (96.8)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
TAR_1
38. online method using public detections 		57.8
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
RegTL
39. using public detections 		65.0
48.1
±13.7
41.618.1% 39.8% 20,850268,3633,386 (64.6)4,524 (86.3)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
YoloSort
40. online method using public detections 		79.6
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
EAMTT
41. online method using public detections 		84.1
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
PHD_LMP
42. online method using public detections 		77.8
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMOTRPN
43. online method using public detections 		65.0
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GM
44. online method using public detections 		62.9
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
DAN__test
45. using public detections 		91.4
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
SNM17
46. online method using public detections 		83.7
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
RFTracking
47. online method using public detections new 		63.2
48.5
±14.8
43.617.7% 39.0% 24,544262,7653,160 (59.1)5,097 (95.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
Q_ls
48. online method using public detections 		67.2
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
DSA_MOT17
49. online method using public detections 		62.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
DualAtte
50. online method using public detections 		67.8
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
KVIOU
51. online method using public detections 		72.7
46.6
±14.2
44.017.3% 38.1% 34,838262,0084,379 (81.8)7,844 (146.4)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
CGHA_MOT
52. online method using public detections 		89.5
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
TTracker
53. online method using public detections 		69.1
46.2
±14.0
44.021.0% 35.6% 44,854254,4384,258 (77.6)6,307 (114.9)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
AEb_O
54. online method using public detections 		63.9
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
LT17
55. online method using public detections 		70.5
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
MTDF17
56. online method using public detections 		71.3
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
SOTD_MC
57. online method using public detections 		57.3
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
MASS
58. online method using public detections 		71.8
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
D_SST_V1
59. online method using public detections 		86.8
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
CASC_MOT
60. online method using public detections 		81.9
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MHT_ReID7
61. using public detections 		75.9
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
AFN17
62. using public detections 		44.0
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
GMPHDOGM17
63. online method using public detections 		48.4
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In IEEE Access, 2019.
MHT_DAM
64. using public detections 		51.5
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
FWT
65. using public detections 		49.3
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
PPMOT17
66. using public detections 		45.0
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
OTCD_1
67. online method using public detections 		65.6
48.6
±13.7
47.916.2% 41.2% 18,499268,2043,502 (66.7)5,588 (106.5)15.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
Lab031
68. using public detections 		70.6
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
TPbase17
69. online method using public detections 		81.8
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
FPSN
70. online method using public detections 		76.3
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HDTR
71. using public detections 		30.4
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
SiaIOU
72. using public detections 		64.3
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
DAM_MOT
73. online method using public detections 		52.3
47.0
±12.6
48.716.9% 38.1% 28,933267,8962,140 (40.7)2,756 (52.5)18.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
FAMNet
74. online method using public detections 		48.6
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
E2EM
75. online method using public detections 		61.9
47.5
±14.5
48.816.5% 37.5% 20,655272,1873,632 (70.2)12,712 (245.6)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
ReID_Seq
76. online method using public detections 		47.3
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
77. using public detections 		71.1
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
OLGT_new
78. online method using public detections 		67.6
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GSDL17
79. online method using public detections 		67.4
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
Alex
80. online method using public detections 		70.2
47.6
±14.2
49.813.2% 41.4% 16,028277,1102,731 (53.7)8,481 (166.7)0.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOT_TBC
81. using public detections 		44.3
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
JDT
82. online method using public detections 		61.8
47.4
±12.2
50.116.8% 37.2% 26,910267,3312,760 (52.5)6,211 (118.0)35.1Public
Anonymous submission
MFT
83. online method using public detections 		61.3
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
OST
84. using public detections 		61.4
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
MOTF17
85. using public detections 		49.8
52.0
±13.2
50.520.1% 40.4% 19,222249,4642,293 (41.1)3,297 (59.1)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
JBNOT
86. using public detections 		45.6
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
GMPHD_Rd17
87. online method using public detections 		63.5
46.3
±14.7
50.819.0% 33.8% 37,249260,8714,742 (88.2)8,636 (160.6)20.1Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT
88. using public detections 		46.2
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,176246,1582,224 (39.5)2,769 (49.1)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
PointMOT17
89. using public detections 		45.9
52.2
±13.3
50.822.4% 40.0% 22,012245,2772,134 (37.8)2,652 (46.9)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
PP17
90. using public detections 		45.7
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,183245,9982,215 (39.3)2,752 (48.8)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOTPP17
91. using public detections 		36.2
52.4
±15.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 19,922246,1832,223 (39.4)2,769 (49.1)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
92. online method using public detections 		54.0
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_SADF17
93. online method using public detections 		55.2
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
EDMT17
94. using public detections 		49.4
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
TTL
95. online method using public detections 		49.2
52.3
±12.9
51.319.3% 38.2% 21,617244,5012,779 (49.0)4,290 (75.7)21.5Public
Anonymous submission
TLO17
96. online method using public detections 		43.0
52.6
±12.9
51.319.5% 38.2% 20,089244,9302,530 (44.7)4,170 (73.7)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
DGCT
97. using public detections 		31.3
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
PV
98. online method using public detections 		50.0
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
OMHT
99. online method using public detections 		40.3
52.6
±12.9
51.919.3% 38.0% 20,153244,9982,552 (45.1)4,148 (73.3)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM
100. using public detections 		61.7
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
AEb
101. using public detections 		36.0
49.5
±13.6
52.020.8% 38.9% 20,822262,2381,779 (33.2)4,792 (89.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM17
102. online method using public detections 		57.4
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
UTA
103. online method using public detections 		44.3
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMP17
104. using public detections 		43.8
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
Tracktor17
105. online method using public detections 		45.8
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
TPM
106. using public detections 		37.7
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TppNoFPN
107. using public detections 		52.1
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT17
108. online method using public detections 		48.0
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
ReTracktor
109. using public detections 		36.6
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
2MPT
110. using public detections 		52.0
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MMHT17
111. online method using public detections 		38.1
52.8
±12.9
53.320.3% 37.5% 25,401238,4132,596 (45.0)4,103 (71.1)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
TLO_MHT
112. online method using public detections 		42.9
52.9
±12.9
53.320.1% 37.6% 24,142238,8342,565 (44.5)4,101 (71.1)20.7Public
Anonymous submission
TOPA
113. online method using public detections 		44.2
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
114. online method using public detections 		42.7
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOT17ZH
115. online method using public detections 		52.7
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
SNet_pub
116. online method using public detections 		53.8
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN17
117. online method using public detections 		55.6
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
DEEP_TAMA
118. online method using public detections 		47.6
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
LSMT
119. online method using public detections 		41.8
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
120. using public detections 		33.8
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SMOTe
121. online method using public detections 		54.9
52.1
±12.1
53.818.4% 33.3% 27,571239,7242,691 (46.8)6,134 (106.7)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
AReid17
122. online method using public detections 		39.8
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ17
123. online method using public detections 		49.6
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
SMOT_no
124. online method using public detections 		48.8
52.9
±12.3
54.118.7% 32.8% 26,703236,3462,702 (46.5)6,340 (109.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
NOTA
125. using public detections 		44.7
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
jCC
126. using public detections 		42.5
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
HTBT
127. using public detections 		40.1
52.3
±13.3
54.522.5% 36.4% 28,743238,2681,959 (33.9)2,973 (51.5)0.4Public
Anonymous submission
STCG17
128. using public detections 		40.6
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
eHAF17
129. using public detections 		39.6
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
SCNet
130. online method using public detections 		49.1
53.2
±15.4
54.920.0% 32.1% 30,440231,1092,621 (44.4)6,031 (102.2)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
overlap
131. using public detections 		33.4
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_AF
132. online method using public detections 		30.6
53.5
±13.4
55.619.2% 37.6% 12,867247,8161,672 (29.8)3,516 (62.7)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
DMAN
133. online method using public detections 		55.3
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
STRN_MOT17
134. online method using public detections 		52.0
50.9
±11.6
56.018.9% 33.8% 25,295249,3652,397 (43.0)9,363 (167.8)13.8Public
J. Xu, Y. Cao, Z. Zhang, H. Hu. Spatial-Temporal Relation Networks for Multi-Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
TLMHT
135. using public detections 		53.8
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
ENFT17
136. using public detections 		33.0
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
SAS_MOT17
137. using public detections 		67.9
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
cnt_klt
138. using public detections 		31.6
48.0
±11.8
57.819.0% 31.6% 63,207228,7831,215 (20.4)4,134 (69.5)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17O
139. online method using public detections 		46.9
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
GMOT
140. using public detections 		19.3
55.4
±12.2
57.922.7% 34.7% 20,608229,5111,403 (23.7)2,765 (46.6)5.9Public
LXD, KHW @ HRI-SH
TrackerAvg RankMOTA IDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
eTC17
141. using public detections 		38.8
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the connectivity: Multi-object tracking with trackletnet. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019.
MPNTrack17
142. using public detections 		26.5
55.7
±13.2
59.127.2% 34.4% 25,013223,5311,433 (23.7)3,122 (51.7)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
143. using public detections 		37.3
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
IDGA
144. using public detections 		29.4
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17
145. using public detections 		39.4
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
TT17
146. using public detections 		31.2
54.9
±12.8
63.124.4% 38.1% 20,236233,2951,088 (18.5)2,392 (40.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
ISDH_HDAv2
147. online method using public detections 		39.5
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.8% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(58.2% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(49.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(19.4% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(18.7% MOTA)

Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.



Contact