MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOT_BJ
1. online method using public detections
111.5
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission
JOINT_TRAC
2. using public detections
90.1
29.4
±17.6
34.512.6% 42.3% 132,192260,8085,397 (100.4)10,704 (199.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
YoloSort
3. online method using public detections
79.6
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
4. online method using public detections
90.5
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
baitrack
5. using public detections
68.0
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
GLMBS3
6. using public detections
95.0
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
GoturnM17
7. online method using public detections
99.4
38.3
±9.0
25.79.4% 47.1% 55,381282,67010,328 (207.0)9,849 (197.4)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
CTRACKER
8. online method using public detections
83.6
39.4
±13.5
26.113.4% 42.5% 16,249307,90017,592 (387.2)14,508 (319.3)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_KCF
9. online method using public detections
98.5
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
XYHv2
10. online method using public detections
106.5
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ResTestV2
11. using public detections
90.1
40.0
±16.7
36.912.1% 39.5% 71,781261,0725,718 (106.4)9,675 (180.1)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
wangs
12. online method using public detections new
93.5
40.1
±14.0
31.313.4% 42.5% 16,252307,90313,760 (302.9)14,419 (317.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
98K
13. using public detections
74.5
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
TM_track
14. online method using public detections
105.3
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
CGHA_MOT
15. online method using public detections
89.5
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
c3d_Track
16. online method using public detections
88.0
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
cascademot
17. online method using public detections
85.3
41.8
±16.0
34.215.2% 38.7% 27,816288,76811,535 (236.3)14,800 (303.2)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
GNNMOT
18. online method using public detections
78.9
42.0
±12.8
29.312.0% 50.0% 23,294299,6944,377 (93.4)3,847 (82.1)177.6Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
19. online method using public detections
87.6
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_N1Tr
20. online method using public detections
88.2
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
CASC_MOT
21. online method using public detections
81.9
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
ms_dh
22. online method using public detections
96.8
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTT
23. online method using public detections
84.1
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
D_SST_V1
24. online method using public detections
86.8
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
DAN__test
25. using public detections
91.4
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
SORT17
26. online method using public detections
88.5
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
TPbase17
27. online method using public detections
81.8
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
ZM
28. online method using public detections
93.3
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
MOTbyReID
29. online method using public detections
87.9
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_SHA
30. online method using public detections
82.6
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
Umot
31. online method using public detections
91.4
43.9
±13.8
37.815.2% 38.9% 28,596278,6219,363 (185.0)11,371 (224.6)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_D
32. online method using public detections
83.0
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
33. using public detections
67.9
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
GOTURN_3B
34. online method using public detections
81.5
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_DAL
35. online method using public detections
84.7
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
HISP_T17
36. online method using public detections
84.0
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
FPSN
37. online method using public detections
76.3
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
DSA_MOT17
38. online method using public detections
62.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
dcor
39. online method using public detections
75.8
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
GF
40. online method using public detections
78.1
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
zxbtk17
41. online method using public detections
77.7
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
HISP_DAL17
42. online method using public detections
81.8
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
DCORV2
43. online method using public detections
71.9
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
IOU17
44. using public detections
72.8
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
EDA_GNN
45. online method using public detections
71.0
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
OLGT_new
46. online method using public detections
67.6
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
47. online method using public detections
54.0
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_LMP
48. online method using public detections
77.8
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
TTracker
49. online method using public detections
69.1
46.2
±14.0
44.021.0% 35.6% 44,854254,4384,258 (77.6)6,307 (114.9)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_Rd17
50. online method using public detections
63.5
46.3
±14.7
50.819.0% 33.8% 37,249260,8714,742 (88.2)8,636 (160.6)20.1Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
AEb_O
51. online method using public detections
63.9
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_ReID7
52. using public detections
75.9
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
KVIOU
53. online method using public detections
72.7
46.6
±14.2
44.017.3% 38.1% 34,838262,0084,379 (81.8)7,844 (146.4)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
SNM17
54. online method using public detections
83.7
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
Lab031
55. using public detections
70.6
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
MASS
56. online method using public detections
71.8
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
DAM_MOT
57. online method using public detections
52.3
47.0
±12.6
48.716.9% 38.1% 28,933267,8962,140 (40.7)2,756 (52.5)18.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
QiMOT
58. online method using public detections
78.8
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
59. using public detections
71.1
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
JDT
60. online method using public detections
61.8
47.4
±12.2
50.116.8% 37.2% 26,910267,3312,760 (52.5)6,211 (118.0)35.1Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
E2EM
61. online method using public detections
61.9
47.5
±14.5
48.816.5% 37.5% 20,655272,1873,632 (70.2)12,712 (245.6)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM
62. using public detections
61.7
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
Alex
63. online method using public detections
70.2
47.6
±14.2
49.813.2% 41.4% 16,028277,1102,731 (53.7)8,481 (166.7)0.2Public
Anonymous submission
LT17
64. online method using public detections
70.5
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN
65. online method using public detections
79.5
47.8
±13.2
41.417.0% 41.7% 38,279251,9894,325 (78.2)5,355 (96.8)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
cnt_klt
66. using public detections
31.6
48.0
±11.8
57.819.0% 31.6% 63,207228,7831,215 (20.4)4,134 (69.5)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GSDL17
67. online method using public detections
67.4
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
AM_ADM17
68. online method using public detections
57.4
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
DeepMOTRPN
69. online method using public detections
65.0
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
2MPT
70. using public detections
52.0
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
RegTL
71. using public detections
65.0
48.1
±13.7
41.618.1% 39.8% 20,850268,3633,386 (64.6)4,524 (86.3)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
DMAN
72. online method using public detections
55.3
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
HAM_SADF17
73. online method using public detections
55.2
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
SOTD_MC
74. online method using public detections
57.3
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
DualAtte
75. online method using public detections
67.8
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
RFTracking
76. online method using public detections new
63.2
48.5
±14.8
43.617.7% 39.0% 24,544262,7653,160 (59.1)5,097 (95.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
SiaIOU
77. using public detections
64.3
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
OTCD_1
78. online method using public detections
65.6
48.6
±13.7
47.916.2% 41.2% 18,499268,2043,502 (66.7)5,588 (106.5)15.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
PHD_GM
79. online method using public detections
62.9
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
AEb
80. using public detections
36.0
49.5
±13.6
52.020.8% 38.9% 20,822262,2381,779 (33.2)4,792 (89.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MTDF17
81. online method using public detections
71.3
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
OST
82. using public detections
61.4
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHDOGM17
83. online method using public detections
48.4
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In IEEE Access, 2019.
EDMT17
84. using public detections
49.4
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
Q_ls
85. online method using public detections
67.2
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
DEEP_TAMA
86. online method using public detections
47.6
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
DeepMP17
87. using public detections
43.8
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
TLMHT
88. using public detections
53.8
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
MHT_DAM
89. using public detections
51.5
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MOTDT17
90. online method using public detections
48.0
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
STRN_MOT17
91. online method using public detections
52.0
50.9
±11.6
56.018.9% 33.8% 25,295249,3652,397 (43.0)9,363 (167.8)13.8Public
J. Xu, Y. Cao, Z. Zhang, H. Hu. Spatial-Temporal Relation Networks for Multi-Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
SRPN17
92. online method using public detections
55.6
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
93. online method using public detections
42.7
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOT17ZH
94. online method using public detections
52.7
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
STCG17
95. using public detections
40.6
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
jCC
96. using public detections
42.5
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
NOTA
97. using public detections
44.7
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
FWT
98. using public detections
49.3
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
AReid17
99. online method using public detections
39.8
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ17
100. online method using public detections
49.6
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ReID_Seq
101. online method using public detections
47.3
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT17
102. using public detections
45.0
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
overlap
103. using public detections
33.4
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
AFN17
104. using public detections
44.0
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
TAR_1
105. online method using public detections
57.8
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
SNet_pub
106. online method using public detections
53.8
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
eHAF17
107. using public detections
39.6
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TOPA
108. online method using public detections
44.2
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
109. using public detections
37.3
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
LSMT
110. online method using public detections
41.8
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
eTC17
111. using public detections
38.8
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the connectivity: Multi-object tracking with trackletnet. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019.
MOTF17
112. using public detections
49.8
52.0
±13.2
50.520.1% 40.4% 19,222249,4642,293 (41.1)3,297 (59.1)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
FAMNet
113. online method using public detections
48.6
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
SMOTe
114. online method using public detections
54.9
52.1
±12.1
53.818.4% 33.3% 27,571239,7242,691 (46.8)6,134 (106.7)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
PointMOT17
115. using public detections
45.9
52.2
±13.3
50.822.4% 40.0% 22,012245,2772,134 (37.8)2,652 (46.9)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
HTBT
116. using public detections
40.1
52.3
±13.3
54.522.5% 36.4% 28,743238,2681,959 (33.9)2,973 (51.5)0.4Public
Anonymous submission
TTL
117. online method using public detections
49.2
52.3
±12.9
51.319.3% 38.2% 21,617244,5012,779 (49.0)4,290 (75.7)21.5Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT
118. using public detections
46.2
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,176246,1582,224 (39.5)2,769 (49.1)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
TppNoFPN
119. using public detections
52.1
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
PP17
120. using public detections
45.7
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,183245,9982,215 (39.3)2,752 (48.8)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOTPP17
121. using public detections
36.2
52.4
±15.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 19,922246,1832,223 (39.4)2,769 (49.1)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
OMHT
122. online method using public detections
40.3
52.6
±12.9
51.919.3% 38.0% 20,153244,9982,552 (45.1)4,148 (73.3)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
TLO17
123. online method using public detections
43.0
52.6
±12.9
51.319.5% 38.2% 20,089244,9302,530 (44.7)4,170 (73.7)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
IDGA
124. using public detections
29.4
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
JBNOT
125. using public detections
45.6
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
LSST17O
126. online method using public detections
46.9
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
PV
127. online method using public detections
50.0
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
MMHT17
128. online method using public detections
38.1
52.8
±12.9
53.320.3% 37.5% 25,401238,4132,596 (45.0)4,103 (71.1)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
ENFT17
129. using public detections
33.0
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
SMOT_no
130. online method using public detections
48.8
52.9
±12.3
54.118.7% 32.8% 26,703236,3462,702 (46.5)6,340 (109.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TLO_MHT
131. online method using public detections
42.9
52.9
±12.9
53.320.1% 37.6% 24,142238,8342,565 (44.5)4,101 (71.1)20.7Public
Anonymous submission
UTA
132. online method using public detections
44.3
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
133. using public detections
33.8
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
MFT
134. online method using public detections
61.3
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
SCNet
135. online method using public detections
49.1
53.2
±15.4
54.920.0% 32.1% 30,440231,1092,621 (44.4)6,031 (102.2)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_AF
136. online method using public detections
30.6
53.5
±13.4
55.619.2% 37.6% 12,867247,8161,672 (29.8)3,516 (62.7)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
Tracktor17
137. online method using public detections
45.8
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
MOT_TBC
138. using public detections
44.3
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
HDTR
139. using public detections
30.4
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
TPM
140. using public detections
37.7
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg Rank MOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ISDH_HDAv2
141. online method using public detections
39.5
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
DGCT
142. using public detections
31.3
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
LSST17
143. using public detections
39.4
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
TT17
144. using public detections
31.2
54.9
±12.8
63.124.4% 38.1% 20,236233,2951,088 (18.5)2,392 (40.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
ReTracktor
145. using public detections
36.6
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
GMOT
146. using public detections
19.3
55.4
±12.2
57.922.7% 34.7% 20,608229,5111,403 (23.7)2,765 (46.6)5.9Public
LXD, KHW @ HRI-SH
MPNTrack17
147. using public detections
26.5
55.7
±13.2
59.127.2% 34.4% 25,013223,5311,433 (23.7)3,122 (51.7)4.2Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.8% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(58.2% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(49.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(19.4% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(18.7% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.