MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
hpmmt17
1. online method using public detections
21.2
51.2
±11.8
53.617.3% 34.9% 21,957250,8912,292 (41.3)6,108 (110.0)44,392.5Public
Anonymous submission
STDIC
2. online method using public detections
42.5
44.1
±13.6
45.913.2% 39.6% 46,126266,4492,992 (56.7)5,143 (97.4)17,757.0Public
Anonymous submission
ORCtracker
3. online method using public detections
33.7
50.7
±13.7
43.117.0% 35.2% 20,440249,7918,069 (144.8)11,188 (200.8)3,760.7Public
C. Deniz Cicek(Cortexica Vision System)
DH_TRK
4. using public detections
22.8
54.1
±13.0
49.221.6% 28.4% 36,196216,6705,918 (96.1)7,760 (126.0)1,775.7Public
Anonymous submission
IOU17
5. using public detections
41.6
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
TBD17_1
6. online method using public detections
26.8
51.4
±11.7
52.018.5% 33.2% 24,261247,1952,985 (53.1)6,611 (117.7)1,183.8Public
Anonymous submission
BIG_HA
7. online method using public detections
40.4
-37.9
±24.1
0.00.0% 100.0% 213,867564,2280 (nan)0 (nan)887.9Public
Anonymous submission
PA_MOT17
8. online method using public detections
22.4
51.6
±13.5
53.518.9% 33.5% 28,794241,7042,635 (46.1)5,808 (101.6)710.3Public
Anonymous submission
TOPA
9. online method using public detections new
23.8
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
L_SORT
10. using public detections
40.8
45.0
±14.0
46.012.2% 41.1% 19,967287,2293,294 (67.1)8,292 (168.9)102.6Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
PeriodMOT
11. online method using public detections
45.8
43.8
±13.2
40.914.7% 42.0% 21,941290,1944,910 (101.1)6,649 (136.9)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
AEb
12. using public detections
27.0
48.1
±13.4
46.017.7% 39.5% 16,839273,8192,350 (45.7)5,275 (102.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
REQT
13. online method using public detections
44.3
43.9
±14.2
47.413.1% 45.8% 34,309279,0302,986 (59.1)5,402 (106.9)64.1Public
Anonymous submission
IDGA
14. using public detections
24.6
49.9
±12.2
50.322.1% 36.7% 37,060243,1482,426 (42.6)3,846 (67.6)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
CDT
15. using public detections
41.3
-64.5
±16.9
0.10.0% 99.4% 364,642563,67272 (730.7)64 (649.5)46.9Public
Anonymous submission
dcor
16. online method using public detections
43.2
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
EDA_GNN
17. online method using public detections
39.9
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
GM_PHD
18. online method using public detections
49.2
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
terry_T
19. online method using public detections
57.8
2.5
±6.9
12.10.4% 83.9% 96,372448,0055,756 (279.4)11,270 (547.1)34.7Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT17
20. online method using public detections
25.6
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
BU_CV
21. online method using public detections
45.3
42.8
±14.4
32.315.8% 36.1% 40,573271,83810,118 (195.2)9,426 (181.9)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
Sn_PBC
22. using public detections
26.5
51.3
±11.7
53.417.4% 35.2% 21,255251,2562,394 (43.2)6,148 (110.8)14.8Public
Anonymous submission
ZM
23. online method using public detections
52.8
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
RTac
24. online method using public detections
35.8
46.3
±14.6
49.218.9% 33.5% 43,447255,1584,196 (76.6)6,056 (110.6)14.1Public
Anonymous submission
YT_T
25. online method using public detections
46.3
45.4
±13.4
40.316.0% 35.7% 25,425275,0507,652 (149.3)8,249 (160.9)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
26. using public detections
15.7
52.0
±13.2
54.823.3% 37.7% 31,660237,5471,827 (31.6)2,738 (47.3)10.2Public
Anonymous submission
DSA_MOT17
27. online method using public detections
35.0
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
RTRC
28. online method using public detections
35.9
48.5
±14.2
48.618.7% 35.7% 34,180252,8593,490 (63.2)6,304 (114.2)9.8Public
Anonymous submission
reID2track
29. online method using public detections
48.3
44.6
±14.3
39.915.8% 39.7% 22,451284,2136,134 (123.6)13,786 (277.8)9.0Public
Anonymous submission
TEM
30. using public detections
35.5
49.1
±12.6
45.417.0% 38.3% 22,119261,7973,439 (64.2)3,881 (72.4)8.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
IDOHMPT
31. online method using public detections
42.1
46.0
±13.1
44.116.8% 36.6% 30,873268,2215,768 (109.9)9,663 (184.2)8.1Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_test
32. online method using public detections
23.5
51.6
±11.9
53.917.3% 35.5% 21,419249,0592,384 (42.7)5,613 (100.5)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
IOUT_Re
33. online method using public detections
26.5
52.7
±13.0
43.320.1% 32.6% 16,529243,2266,946 (122.1)6,520 (114.6)7.0Public
Anonymous submission
DGCT
34. using public detections
20.4
54.3
±13.1
50.620.3% 33.7% 15,508238,2464,243 (73.4)6,684 (115.7)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
TBNMF17
35. online method using public detections
28.3
50.6
±12.6
49.318.9% 39.2% 17,522258,9902,014 (37.2)4,432 (81.9)6.9Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GSDL17
36. online method using public detections
36.6
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
TCF
37. online method using public detections
37.0
48.3
±13.6
48.718.9% 35.1% 36,274252,0923,530 (63.8)6,390 (115.5)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
CEMT
38. using public detections
30.3
49.3
±12.6
44.416.8% 38.5% 21,711261,8082,696 (50.3)3,409 (63.6)5.8Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM17
39. online method using public detections
31.0
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
TAR_1
40. online method using public detections
30.7
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
HIK_MOT17
41. using public detections
16.4
53.9
±13.7
54.323.7% 32.0% 27,656230,0422,386 (40.3)4,192 (70.8)5.4Public
COMOT
42. online method using public detections
33.6
46.4
±13.5
48.514.8% 42.2% 20,752279,8162,069 (41.0)4,606 (91.4)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_SADF17
43. online method using public detections
28.8
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
SSOMOT
44. online method using public detections
37.8
46.8
±13.1
49.215.3% 39.1% 24,041274,2572,121 (41.3)4,897 (95.3)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
45. using public detections
36.0
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN17
46. online method using public detections
29.1
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
ISDH_HDAv2
47. online method using public detections
21.3
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
GMPHD_KCF
48. online method using public detections
53.2
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
ReDetPast
49. online method using public detections
49.4
44.3
±14.8
34.917.3% 36.7% 32,113271,34310,962 (211.2)11,733 (226.0)3.3Public
Anonymous submission
TLMHT
50. using public detections
28.2
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
LM_NN
51. using public detections
37.4
45.1
±13.3
43.214.8% 46.2% 10,834296,4512,286 (48.2)2,463 (51.9)2.5Public
NEUCOM-D-18-03230
TM_track
52. online method using public detections
51.6
44.4
±14.6
43.915.8% 38.5% 26,067279,8328,038 (159.5)14,105 (279.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
yt_face
53. online method using public detections
22.8
52.6
±13.1
51.523.0% 35.9% 23,894241,4892,047 (35.8)2,827 (49.4)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM
54. using public detections
32.6
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
Q_ls
55. online method using public detections
36.8
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
QiMOT
56. online method using public detections
43.2
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
Qclc
57. online method using public detections
25.5
54.0
±14.3
47.723.3% 30.7% 22,374232,2124,748 (80.7)6,022 (102.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
jCC
58. using public detections
22.8
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
AFN17
59. using public detections
23.8
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
Paper ID 4411
HDTR
60. using public detections
16.0
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
BnW
61. online method using public detections
23.0
52.5
±15.3
52.618.7% 36.7% 19,192245,7652,822 (50.0)5,610 (99.4)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTT
62. online method using public detections
48.8
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)1.4Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
MTDF17
63. online method using public detections
37.8
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Anonymous submission
ts_WCFMT
64. online method using public detections
35.9
48.4
±13.6
51.421.0% 32.5% 32,037255,4723,410 (62.3)6,351 (116.1)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
WCFMT17
65. using public detections
35.6
47.3
±16.0
52.321.9% 30.7% 43,253250,3023,556 (63.9)6,071 (109.1)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_DAM
66. using public detections
28.1
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
HCC
67. using public detections
31.9
44.8
±11.2
46.818.3% 38.9% 17,586292,2941,555 (32.3)2,221 (46.1)0.9Public
Anonymous submission
TPM
68. using public detections
20.6
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
SNM17
69. online method using public detections
46.5
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
eHAF17
70. using public detections
20.9
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.Frag HzDetector
eTC17
71. using public detections
20.7
51.9
±12.8
58.023.5% 35.5% 37,311231,6582,294 (38.9)2,917 (49.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
SemiOMOT
72. using public detections
23.3
52.4
±15.0
51.022.6% 34.6% 23,660242,9532,070 (36.4)3,170 (55.7)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_PM_OM
73. online method using public detections
39.8
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)0.6Public
Anonymous submission
EDMT17
74. using public detections
26.9
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
NV_MC
75. using public detections
32.1
49.1
±13.9
45.719.0% 38.0% 16,850267,9232,446 (46.6)3,196 (60.9)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
NOTBD
76. using public detections
26.2
53.9
±12.7
51.221.5% 35.6% 28,912228,3562,964 (49.8)3,600 (60.5)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
DMAN
77. online method using public detections
30.2
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
FWT
78. using public detections
27.1
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
MOT_BJ
79. online method using public detections
34.3
50.4
±12.3
51.018.2% 34.1% 30,911245,8313,296 (58.4)6,279 (111.3)0.0Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(69.5% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(56.3% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(49.8% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(20.6% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(20.1% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.