MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
zxbtk17
1. online method using public detections
57.3
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
ZM
2. online method using public detections
69.7
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ17
3. online method using public detections
36.7
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
YoloSort
4. online method using public detections
59.1
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
XYHv2
5. online method using public detections
79.6
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
UTA
6. online method using public detections
32.8
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
Tracktor17
7. online method using public detections
33.8
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
TppNoFPN
8. using public detections
38.3
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
TPM
9. using public detections
28.5
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TPbase17
10. online method using public detections
61.0
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TOPA
11. online method using public detections
32.3
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
TM_track
12. online method using public detections
79.5
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
TLMHT
13. using public detections
39.3
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TAR_1
14. online method using public detections
42.8
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
STCG17
15. using public detections
30.1
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN17
16. online method using public detections
40.7
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
SOTD_MC
17. online method using public detections
43.0
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
SORT17
18. online method using public detections
66.8
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
SNM17
19. online method using public detections
62.6
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
SNet_pub
20. online method using public detections
39.1
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SiaIOU
21. using public detections
46.7
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
22. using public detections
50.5
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
ReTracktor
23. using public detections
27.2
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
ReID_Seq
24. online method using public detections
33.4
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
Q_ls
25. online method using public detections
50.4
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
QiMOT
26. online method using public detections
59.0
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
PV
27. online method using public detections
37.2
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT17
28. using public detections new
32.6
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_LMP
29. online method using public detections
58.1
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GSDL17
30. online method using public detections
50.0
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
PHD_GM
31. online method using public detections
46.8
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
overlap
32. using public detections
25.0
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
OTCD_1
33. online method using public detections
55.9
44.9
±13.6
42.314.0% 44.2% 16,280291,1363,573 (73.8)5,444 (112.5)46.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
OST
34. using public detections
45.4
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
OLGT_new
35. online method using public detections
50.1
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
NOTA
36. using public detections
32.7
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
SPL-26677-2019
MTDF17
37. online method using public detections
53.9
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
ms_dh
38. online method using public detections
73.3
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_TBC
39. using public detections
32.3
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
40. using public detections
52.8
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOT_BJ
41. online method using public detections
84.9
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_AF
42. online method using public detections new
25.6
53.5
±13.5
52.219.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,114 (37.7)4,611 (82.3)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOTPP17
43. using public detections new
36.7
50.3
±13.4
47.522.0% 39.9% 27,346250,6922,549 (45.9)3,022 (54.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT17
44. online method using public detections
34.8
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
MOTbyReID
45. online method using public detections
66.5
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
MOT17ZH
46. online method using public detections
39.1
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_ReID7
47. using public detections
56.1
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_DAM
48. using public detections
38.2
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MHT_bLSTM
49. using public detections
45.3
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
MFT
50. online method using public detections
46.2
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MASS
51. online method using public detections
52.8
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
LT17
52. online method using public detections
52.5
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17O
53. online method using public detections
35.1
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
LSST17
54. using public detections
29.3
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
LSMT
55. online method using public detections
29.8
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
Lab031
56. using public detections
51.7
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
jCC
57. using public detections
31.0
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
JBNOT
58. using public detections
33.3
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
ISDH_HDAv2
59. online method using public detections
29.9
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
IOU17
60. using public detections
54.7
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
IDGA
61. using public detections
21.8
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
HISP_T17
62. online method using public detections
63.1
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
HISP_DAL17
63. online method using public detections
61.1
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
HDTR
64. using public detections
22.3
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
HAM_SADF17
65. online method using public detections
40.1
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
GOTURN_3B
66. online method using public detections
61.0
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_D
67. online method using public detections
62.4
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
68. online method using public detections
65.8
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
69. online method using public detections
68.5
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
GMPHD_SHA
70. online method using public detections
61.4
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GMPHD_N1Tr
71. online method using public detections
66.5
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
GMPHD_KCF
72. online method using public detections
74.5
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
GMPHD_DAL
73. online method using public detections
64.1
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GMPHDOGM17
74. online method using public detections
35.7
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking Framework with the GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In arXiv:1907.13347, 2019.
GLMBS3
75. using public detections
71.9
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
GF
76. online method using public detections
57.8
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
FWT
77. using public detections
35.4
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
FPSN
78. online method using public detections
56.1
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
FAMNet
79. online method using public detections
35.3
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
eTC17
80. using public detections
28.8
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNet. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07258, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ENFT17
81. using public detections
25.2
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
eHAF17
82. using public detections
29.4
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
EDMT17
83. using public detections
36.8
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
EDA_GNN
84. online method using public detections
52.6
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
EAMTT
85. online method using public detections
62.6
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
D_SST_V1
86. online method using public detections
65.7
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
DualAtte
87. online method using public detections
49.8
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
88. online method using public detections
31.1
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
89. online method using public detections
40.3
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DSA_MOT17
90. online method using public detections
45.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
DMAN
91. online method using public detections
41.1
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
DGCT
92. using public detections
22.3
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
DEEP_TAMA
93. online method using public detections
35.3
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
DeepMP17
94. using public detections
31.3
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
DeepMOTRPN
95. online method using public detections
47.7
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
dcor
96. online method using public detections
56.3
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
DCORV2
97. online method using public detections
53.1
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
DAN__test
98. using public detections
68.6
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
99. using public detections
24.8
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
100. using public detections
26.4
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
CGHA_MOT
101. online method using public detections
66.8
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
CASC_MOT
102. online method using public detections
60.6
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
c3d_Track
103. online method using public detections
66.3
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
baitrack
104. using public detections
51.1
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
AReid17
105. online method using public detections
28.4
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM17
106. online method using public detections
42.3
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
AFN17
107. using public detections
31.3
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
AEb_O
108. online method using public detections
47.1
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
AEb
109. using public detections
34.1
47.9
±13.6
47.018.1% 40.7% 15,828276,1792,082 (40.8)4,733 (92.7)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
98K
110. using public detections
55.6
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
2MPT
111. using public detections
38.0
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.8% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(57.8% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(48.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(18.2% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(17.4% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.