MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
2MPT
1. using public detections
52.0
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
98K
2. using public detections
74.5
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
AEb
3. using public detections
36.0
49.5
±13.6
52.020.8% 38.9% 20,822262,2381,779 (33.2)4,792 (89.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
AEb_O
4. online method using public detections
63.9
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
AFN17
5. using public detections
44.0
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
Alex
6. online method using public detections
70.2
47.6
±14.2
49.813.2% 41.4% 16,028277,1102,731 (53.7)8,481 (166.7)0.2Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM17
7. online method using public detections
57.4
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
AReid17
8. online method using public detections
39.8
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
baitrack
9. using public detections
68.0
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
c3d_Track
10. online method using public detections
88.0
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
cascademot
11. online method using public detections
85.3
41.8
±16.0
34.215.2% 38.7% 27,816288,76811,535 (236.3)14,800 (303.2)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
CASC_MOT
12. online method using public detections
81.9
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
CGHA_MOT
13. online method using public detections
89.5
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
14. using public detections
37.3
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
cnt_klt
15. using public detections
31.6
48.0
±11.8
57.819.0% 31.6% 63,207228,7831,215 (20.4)4,134 (69.5)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
16. using public detections
33.8
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
CTRACKER
17. online method using public detections
83.6
39.4
±13.5
26.113.4% 42.5% 16,249307,90017,592 (387.2)14,508 (319.3)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DAM_MOT
18. online method using public detections
52.3
47.0
±12.6
48.716.9% 38.1% 28,933267,8962,140 (40.7)2,756 (52.5)18.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
DAN__test
19. using public detections
91.4
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
DCORV2
20. online method using public detections
71.9
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
dcor
21. online method using public detections
75.8
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMOTRPN
22. online method using public detections
65.0
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMP17
23. using public detections
43.8
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
DEEP_TAMA
24. online method using public detections
47.6
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
DGCT
25. using public detections
31.3
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
DMAN
26. online method using public detections
55.3
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
DSA_MOT17
27. online method using public detections
62.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
28. online method using public detections
54.0
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
29. online method using public detections
42.7
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
DualAtte
30. online method using public detections
67.8
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
D_SST_V1
31. online method using public detections
86.8
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
E2EM
32. online method using public detections
61.9
47.5
±14.5
48.816.5% 37.5% 20,655272,1873,632 (70.2)12,712 (245.6)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTT
33. online method using public detections
84.1
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
EDA_GNN
34. online method using public detections
71.0
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
EDMT17
35. using public detections
49.4
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
eHAF17
36. using public detections
39.6
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
ENFT17
37. using public detections
33.0
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
eTC17
38. using public detections
38.8
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the connectivity: Multi-object tracking with trackletnet. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019.
FAMNet
39. online method using public detections
48.6
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
FPSN
40. online method using public detections
76.3
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
FWT
41. using public detections
49.3
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
GF
42. online method using public detections
78.1
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GLMBS3
43. using public detections
95.0
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMOT
44. using public detections
19.3
55.4
±12.2
57.922.7% 34.7% 20,608229,5111,403 (23.7)2,765 (46.6)5.9Public
LXD, KHW @ HRI-SH
GMPHDOGM17
45. online method using public detections
48.4
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In IEEE Access, 2019.
GMPHD_DAL
46. online method using public detections
84.7
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GMPHD_KCF
47. online method using public detections
98.5
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
GMPHD_N1Tr
48. online method using public detections
88.2
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
GMPHD_Rd17
49. online method using public detections
63.5
46.3
±14.7
50.819.0% 33.8% 37,249260,8714,742 (88.2)8,636 (160.6)20.1Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_SHA
50. online method using public detections
82.6
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GM_PHD
51. online method using public detections
90.5
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
GM_PHD
52. online method using public detections
87.6
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_D
53. online method using public detections
83.0
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GNNMOT
54. online method using public detections
78.9
42.0
±12.8
29.312.0% 50.0% 23,294299,6944,377 (93.4)3,847 (82.1)177.6Public
Anonymous submission
GoturnM17
55. online method using public detections
99.4
38.3
±9.0
25.79.4% 47.1% 55,381282,67010,328 (207.0)9,849 (197.4)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
GOTURN_3B
56. online method using public detections
81.5
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_SADF17
57. online method using public detections
55.2
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
HDTR
58. using public detections
30.4
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
HISP_DAL17
59. online method using public detections
81.8
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
HISP_T17
60. online method using public detections
84.0
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HTBT
61. using public detections
40.1
52.3
±13.3
54.522.5% 36.4% 28,743238,2681,959 (33.9)2,973 (51.5)0.4Public
Anonymous submission
IDGA
62. using public detections
29.4
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
IOU17
63. using public detections
72.8
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
ISDH_HDAv2
64. online method using public detections
39.5
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
JBNOT
65. using public detections
45.6
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
jCC
66. using public detections
42.5
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
JDT
67. online method using public detections
61.8
47.4
±12.2
50.116.8% 37.2% 26,910267,3312,760 (52.5)6,211 (118.0)35.1Public
Anonymous submission
JOINT_TRAC
68. using public detections
90.1
29.4
±17.6
34.512.6% 42.3% 132,192260,8085,397 (100.4)10,704 (199.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
KVIOU
69. online method using public detections
72.7
46.6
±14.2
44.017.3% 38.1% 34,838262,0084,379 (81.8)7,844 (146.4)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
Lab031
70. using public detections
70.6
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
LSMT
71. online method using public detections
41.8
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17
72. using public detections
39.4
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
LSST17O
73. online method using public detections
46.9
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
LT17
74. online method using public detections
70.5
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
MASS
75. online method using public detections
71.8
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
MFT
76. online method using public detections
61.3
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM
77. using public detections
61.7
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
MHT_DAM
78. using public detections
51.5
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MHT_ReID7
79. using public detections
75.9
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
MMHT17
80. online method using public detections
38.1
52.8
±12.9
53.320.3% 37.5% 25,401238,4132,596 (45.0)4,103 (71.1)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOT17ZH
81. online method using public detections
52.7
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
MOTbyReID
82. online method using public detections
87.9
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT17
83. online method using public detections
48.0
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
MOTF17
84. using public detections
49.8
52.0
±13.2
50.520.1% 40.4% 19,222249,4642,293 (41.1)3,297 (59.1)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOTPP17
85. using public detections
36.2
52.4
±15.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 19,922246,1832,223 (39.4)2,769 (49.1)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_AF
86. online method using public detections
30.6
53.5
±13.4
55.619.2% 37.6% 12,867247,8161,672 (29.8)3,516 (62.7)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_BJ
87. online method using public detections
111.5
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
88. using public detections
71.1
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_TBC
89. using public detections
44.3
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
MPNTrack17
90. using public detections
26.5
55.7
±13.2
59.127.2% 34.4% 25,013223,5311,433 (23.7)3,122 (51.7)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ms_dh
91. online method using public detections
96.8
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
MTDF17
92. online method using public detections
71.3
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
NOTA
93. using public detections
44.7
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
OLGT_new
94. online method using public detections
67.6
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
OMHT
95. online method using public detections
40.3
52.6
±12.9
51.919.3% 38.0% 20,153244,9982,552 (45.1)4,148 (73.3)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
OST
96. using public detections
61.4
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
OTCD_1
97. online method using public detections
65.6
48.6
±13.7
47.916.2% 41.2% 18,499268,2043,502 (66.7)5,588 (106.5)15.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
overlap
98. using public detections
33.4
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GM
99. online method using public detections
62.9
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
PHD_GSDL17
100. online method using public detections
67.4
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
PHD_LMP
101. online method using public detections
77.8
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
PointMOT17
102. using public detections
45.9
52.2
±13.3
50.822.4% 40.0% 22,012245,2772,134 (37.8)2,652 (46.9)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
PP17
103. using public detections
45.7
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,183245,9982,215 (39.3)2,752 (48.8)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT17
104. using public detections
45.0
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT
105. using public detections
46.2
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,176246,1582,224 (39.5)2,769 (49.1)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
PV
106. online method using public detections
50.0
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
QiMOT
107. online method using public detections
78.8
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
Q_ls
108. online method using public detections
67.2
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
RegTL
109. using public detections
65.0
48.1
±13.7
41.618.1% 39.8% 20,850268,3633,386 (64.6)4,524 (86.3)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
ReID_Seq
110. online method using public detections
47.3
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ResTestV2
111. using public detections
90.1
40.0
±16.7
36.912.1% 39.5% 71,781261,0725,718 (106.4)9,675 (180.1)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
ReTracktor
112. using public detections
36.6
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
RFTracking
113. online method using public detections new
63.2
48.5
±14.8
43.617.7% 39.0% 24,544262,7653,160 (59.1)5,097 (95.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
114. using public detections
67.9
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
SCNet
115. online method using public detections
49.1
53.2
±15.4
54.920.0% 32.1% 30,440231,1092,621 (44.4)6,031 (102.2)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
SiaIOU
116. using public detections
64.3
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
SMOTe
117. online method using public detections
54.9
52.1
±12.1
53.818.4% 33.3% 27,571239,7242,691 (46.8)6,134 (106.7)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
SMOT_no
118. online method using public detections
48.8
52.9
±12.3
54.118.7% 32.8% 26,703236,3462,702 (46.5)6,340 (109.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
SNet_pub
119. online method using public detections
53.8
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
SNM17
120. online method using public detections
83.7
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SORT17
121. online method using public detections
88.5
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
SOTD_MC
122. online method using public detections
57.3
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN17
123. online method using public detections
55.6
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN
124. online method using public detections
79.5
47.8
±13.2
41.417.0% 41.7% 38,279251,9894,325 (78.2)5,355 (96.8)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
STCG17
125. using public detections
40.6
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
STRN_MOT17
126. online method using public detections
52.0
50.9
±11.6
56.018.9% 33.8% 25,295249,3652,397 (43.0)9,363 (167.8)13.8Public
J. Xu, Y. Cao, Z. Zhang, H. Hu. Spatial-Temporal Relation Networks for Multi-Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
TAR_1
127. online method using public detections
57.8
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
TLMHT
128. using public detections
53.8
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TLO17
129. online method using public detections
43.0
52.6
±12.9
51.319.5% 38.2% 20,089244,9302,530 (44.7)4,170 (73.7)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
TLO_MHT
130. online method using public detections
42.9
52.9
±12.9
53.320.1% 37.6% 24,142238,8342,565 (44.5)4,101 (71.1)20.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TM_track
131. online method using public detections
105.3
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
TOPA
132. online method using public detections
44.2
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
TPbase17
133. online method using public detections
81.8
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
TPM
134. using public detections
37.7
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TppNoFPN
135. using public detections
52.1
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
Tracktor17
136. online method using public detections
45.8
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
TT17
137. using public detections
31.2
54.9
±12.8
63.124.4% 38.1% 20,236233,2951,088 (18.5)2,392 (40.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
TTL
138. online method using public detections
49.2
52.3
±12.9
51.319.3% 38.2% 21,617244,5012,779 (49.0)4,290 (75.7)21.5Public
Anonymous submission
TTracker
139. online method using public detections
69.1
46.2
±14.0
44.021.0% 35.6% 44,854254,4384,258 (77.6)6,307 (114.9)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
Umot
140. online method using public detections
91.4
43.9
±13.8
37.815.2% 38.9% 28,596278,6219,363 (185.0)11,371 (224.6)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
UTA
141. online method using public detections
44.3
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
wangs
142. online method using public detections new
93.5
40.1
±14.0
31.313.4% 42.5% 16,252307,90313,760 (302.9)14,419 (317.4)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
XYHv2
143. online method using public detections
106.5
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
YoloSort
144. online method using public detections
79.6
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ17
145. online method using public detections
49.6
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
ZM
146. online method using public detections
93.3
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
zxbtk17
147. online method using public detections
77.7
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.8% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(58.2% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(49.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(19.4% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(18.7% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.