MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
2MPT
1. using public detections
42.5
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
98K
2. using public detections
62.0
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
AEb
3. using public detections
38.4
47.9
±13.6
47.018.1% 40.7% 15,828276,1792,082 (40.8)4,733 (92.7)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
AEb_O
4. online method using public detections
53.0
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
AFN17
5. using public detections
36.3
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
AM_ADM17
6. online method using public detections
46.9
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
AReid17
7. online method using public detections
32.5
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
baitrack
8. using public detections
56.3
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
c3d_Track
9. online method using public detections
73.3
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
cascademot
10. online method using public detections new
72.8
41.6
±15.9
34.214.6% 41.8% 25,930292,50611,231 (233.2)14,385 (298.7)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
CASC_MOT
11. online method using public detections
67.5
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
CGHA_MOT
12. online method using public detections
73.8
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
13. using public detections
30.2
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
cnt_klt
14. using public detections
26.2
48.0
±11.5
57.819.0% 31.6% 63,207228,7831,215 (20.4)4,134 (69.5)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
15. using public detections
28.4
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
DAM_MOT
16. online method using public detections
42.7
47.0
±12.6
48.716.9% 38.1% 28,933267,8962,140 (40.7)2,756 (52.5)18.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
DAN__test
17. using public detections
75.9
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
DCORV2
18. online method using public detections
59.5
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
dcor
19. online method using public detections
62.6
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMOTRPN
20. online method using public detections
53.1
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
DeepMP17
21. using public detections
35.7
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
DEEP_TAMA
22. online method using public detections
39.7
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
DGCT
23. using public detections
25.4
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
DMAN
24. online method using public detections
45.8
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
DSA_MOT17
25. online method using public detections
51.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
26. online method using public detections
44.9
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
27. online method using public detections
35.6
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
DualAtte
28. online method using public detections
55.8
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
D_SST_V1
29. online method using public detections
72.3
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTT
30. online method using public detections
69.7
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
EDA_GNN
31. online method using public detections
58.6
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
EDMT17
32. using public detections
41.7
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
eHAF17
33. using public detections
33.2
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
ENFT17
34. using public detections
27.8
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
eTC17
35. using public detections
32.8
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNet. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07258, 2018.
FAMNet
36. online method using public detections
40.1
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
FPSN
37. online method using public detections
62.5
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
FWT
38. using public detections
40.9
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
GF
39. online method using public detections
64.2
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GLMBS3
40. using public detections
79.3
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GMPHDOGM17
41. online method using public detections
40.4
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking Framework with the GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In arXiv:1907.13347, 2019.
GMPHD_DAL
42. online method using public detections
70.2
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GMPHD_KCF
43. online method using public detections
81.9
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
GMPHD_N1Tr
44. online method using public detections
73.3
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
GMPHD_SHA
45. online method using public detections
68.3
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
GM_PHD
46. online method using public detections
75.4
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
GM_PHD
47. online method using public detections
72.6
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_D
48. online method using public detections
68.6
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GOTURN_3B
49. online method using public detections
67.7
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_SADF17
50. online method using public detections
44.8
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HDTR
51. using public detections
25.2
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
HISP_DAL17
52. online method using public detections
67.3
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
HISP_T17
53. online method using public detections
69.3
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
IDGA
54. using public detections
24.3
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
IOU17
55. using public detections
60.5
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
ISDH_HDAv2
56. online method using public detections
32.9
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
JBNOT
57. using public detections
37.4
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
jCC
58. using public detections
35.3
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
JDT
59. online method using public detections new
51.0
47.4
±12.2
50.116.8% 37.2% 26,910267,3312,760 (52.5)6,211 (118.0)35.1Public
Anonymous submission
Lab031
60. using public detections
57.7
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
LSMT
61. online method using public detections
34.0
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17
62. using public detections
33.0
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
LSST17O
63. online method using public detections
38.9
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
LT17
64. online method using public detections
58.0
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
MASS
65. online method using public detections
58.6
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
MFT
66. online method using public detections
51.3
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM
67. using public detections
50.7
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
MHT_DAM
68. using public detections
43.4
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MHT_ReID7
69. using public detections
62.8
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
MOT17ZH
70. online method using public detections
43.9
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MOTbyReID
71. online method using public detections
73.1
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
MOTDT17
72. online method using public detections
39.5
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
MOTF17
73. using public detections new
41.4
52.0
±13.2
50.520.1% 40.4% 19,222249,4642,293 (41.1)3,297 (59.1)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOTPP17
74. using public detections new
29.7
52.4
±15.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 19,922246,1832,223 (39.4)2,769 (49.1)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_AF
75. online method using public detections new
25.3
53.5
±13.4
55.619.2% 37.6% 12,867247,8161,672 (29.8)3,516 (62.7)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_BJ
76. online method using public detections
93.2
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
77. using public detections
58.9
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_TBC
78. using public detections
36.3
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
ms_dh
79. online method using public detections
80.4
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
MTDF17
80. online method using public detections
59.6
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
NOTA
81. using public detections
36.9
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
OLGT_new
82. online method using public detections
55.9
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
OST
83. using public detections
50.9
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
OTCD_1
84. online method using public detections
61.9
44.9
±13.6
42.314.0% 44.2% 16,280291,1363,573 (73.8)5,444 (112.5)46.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
overlap
85. using public detections
28.2
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GM
86. online method using public detections
51.9
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
PHD_GSDL17
87. online method using public detections
55.4
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
PHD_LMP
88. online method using public detections
64.0
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
PointMOT17
89. using public detections
37.4
52.2
±13.3
50.822.4% 40.0% 22,012245,2772,134 (37.8)2,652 (46.9)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
PP17
90. using public detections new
37.8
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,183245,9982,215 (39.3)2,752 (48.8)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
PPMOT17
91. using public detections
37.6
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT
92. using public detections
38.2
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,176246,1582,224 (39.5)2,769 (49.1)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
PV
93. online method using public detections
41.3
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
QiMOT
94. online method using public detections
65.3
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
Q_ls
95. online method using public detections
56.2
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
ReID_Seq
96. online method using public detections
38.9
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
ReTracktor
97. using public detections
30.5
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
98. using public detections
56.1
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
SiaIOU
99. using public detections
52.6
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
SMOTe
100. online method using public detections new
45.8
52.0
±12.1
53.718.6% 33.2% 28,624239,5002,712 (47.1)6,167 (107.2)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SNet_pub
101. online method using public detections
44.0
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
SNM17
102. online method using public detections
69.3
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
SORT17
103. online method using public detections
73.8
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
SOTD_MC
104. online method using public detections
48.2
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN17
105. online method using public detections
45.8
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
STCG17
106. using public detections
33.8
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
TAR_1
107. online method using public detections
47.9
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
TLMHT
108. using public detections
44.0
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TM_track
109. online method using public detections
87.5
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
TOPA
110. online method using public detections
36.5
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TPbase17
111. online method using public detections
67.5
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
TPM
112. using public detections
31.4
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TppNoFPN
113. using public detections
42.6
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
Tracktor17
114. online method using public detections
37.9
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
TT17
115. using public detections new
25.7
54.9
±12.8
63.124.4% 38.1% 20,236233,2951,088 (18.5)2,392 (40.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
Umot
116. online method using public detections new
75.1
43.9
±13.8
37.815.2% 38.9% 28,596278,6219,363 (185.0)11,371 (224.6)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
UTA
117. online method using public detections
36.8
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
XYHv2
118. online method using public detections
88.0
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
YoloSort
119. online method using public detections
65.5
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ17
120. online method using public detections
41.0
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
ZM
121. online method using public detections
77.0
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
zxbtk17
122. online method using public detections
63.8
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.9% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(58.0% MOTA)

MOT17-06-SDP

MOT17-06-SDP

(48.4% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(18.7% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(17.8% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.