MOT17Det Results

Download all results for this benchmark

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Benchmark Statistics

TrackerAPMODAMODPFAFTPFPFNRcllPrcnF1Hz
BreseeNet
1.
0.90
±0.04
89.2
±14.7
82.4 1.1 108,622 6,406 5,942 94.8 94.4 94.6 14.8
SGT_det
2.
0.90
±0.08
86.6
±11.4
82.4 1.3 106,849 7,688 7,715 93.3 93.3 93.3 20.8
J. Hyun, M. Kang, D. Wee, Y. Yeung. Detection Recovery in Online Multi-Object Tracking with Sparse Graph Tracker. In , 2022.
SeedDet
3.
0.90
±0.07
81.8
±12.1
82.8 2.3 107,291 13,631 7,273 93.7 88.7 91.1 8.2
seedland multi-target detection
GST_det_Test
4.
0.90
±0.07
81.8
±12.7
82.9 2.4 107,722 13,972 6,842 94.0 88.5 91.2 29.6
GST_det
5.
0.90
±0.08
79.9
±10.1
82.4 2.5 106,337 14,806 8,227 92.8 87.8 90.2 408.2
MixNet
6.
0.90
±0.07
74.3
±15.0
78.6 3.8 107,764 22,661 6,800 94.1 82.6 88.0 197.3
AInnoDetV2
7.
0.89
±0.05
-58.4
±126.7
79.1 29.5 107,733 174,608 6,831 94.0 38.2 54.3 296.0
AInnovation: PC Attention Net
PA_Det_NJ
8.
0.89
±0.06
82.1
±20.1
79.3 2.4 108,480 14,417 6,084 94.7 88.3 91.4 59.2
PA_TECH_NJ
YTLAB
9.
0.89
±0.07
76.7
±13.1
80.2 2.8 104,555 16,685 10,009 91.3 86.2 88.7 22.3
Z. Cai, Q. Fan, R. Feris, N. Vasconcelos. A unified multi-scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2016.
KDNT
10.
0.89
±0.07
67.1
±22.4
80.1 4.8 105,473 28,623 9,091 92.1 78.7 84.8 0.8
F. Yu, W. Li, Q. Li, Y. Liu, X. Shi, J. Yan. POI: Multiple Object Tracking with High Performance Detection and Appearance Feature. In BMTT, SenseTime Group Limited, 2016.
TrackerAPMODAMODPFAFTPFPFNRcllPrcnF1Hz
F_ViPeD_B
11.
0.89
±0.06
-14.4
±115.1
77.4 20.8 106,698 123,194 7,831 93.2 46.4 62.0 14.8
L. Ciampi, N. Messina, F. Falchi, C. Gennaro, G. Amato. Virtual to Real Adaptation of Pedestrian Detectors. In Sensors, 2020.
GNN_SDT
12.
0.89
±0.09
78.1
±8.3
81.3 2.4 103,895 14,397 10,669 90.7 87.8 89.2 5,919.0
Y. Wang, X. Weng, K. Kitani. Joint Detection and Multi-Object Tracking with Graph Neural Networks. In arXiv, 2020.
ISE_Detv2
13.
0.88
±0.05
67.4
±12.8
79.9 4.9 106,094 28,865 8,470 92.6 78.6 85.0 3.2
MIFD
ZIZOM
14.
0.81
±0.05
72.0
±22.0
79.8 2.2 95,414 12,990 19,139 83.3 88.0 85.6 2.4
C. Lin, L. Jiwen, G. Wang, J. Zhou. Graininess-Aware Deep Feature Learning for Pedestrian Detection. In ECCV, 2018.
SDP
15.
0.81
±0.12
76.9
±16.2
78.0 1.3 95,699 7,599 18,865 83.5 92.6 87.9 0.6
F. Yang, W. Choi, Y. Lin. Exploit All the Layers: Fast and Accurate CNN Object Detector With Scale Dependent Pooling and Cascaded Rejection Classifiers. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
FRCNN
16.
0.72
±0.13
68.5
±0.0
78.0 1.7 88,601 10,081 25,963 77.3 89.8 83.1 5.1
S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, J. Sun. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. In NIPS, 2015.
DPM
17.
0.61
±0.14
31.2
±10.8
75.8 7.1 78,007 42,308 36,557 68.1 64.8 66.4 19.7
P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, D. McAllester, D. Ramanan. Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part Based Models. In TPAMI, 2010.
MHD
18.
0.49
±0.20
11.2
±42.9
69.9 8.8 64,637 51,801 49,927 56.4 55.5 56.0 3.0
Mobilenet-based Human Detection
YLHDv2
19.
0.46
±0.11
56.9
±12.5
73.2 2.5 80,093 14,938 34,471 69.9 84.3 76.4 11.8
https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.08242
HDGP
20.
0.45
±0.20
42.1
±20.1
76.4 1.3 55,680 7,436 58,884 48.6 88.2 62.7 0.6
A. Garcia-Martin, R. Sanchez-Matilla, J. Martinez. Hierarchical detection of persons in groups. In Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2017.
TrackerAPMODAMODPFAFTPFPFNRcllPrcnF1Hz
VDet
21.
0.44
±0.19
44.7
±19.3
75.7 1.0 56,980 5,765 57,584 49.7 90.8 64.3 5.9
Vitrociset Detection Algorithm
ACF
22.
0.32
±0.00
18.1
±0.0
72.1 2.8 37,312 16,539 77,252 32.6 69.3 44.3 74.0
P. Dollar, R. Appel, S. Belongie, P. Perona. Fast Feature Pyramids for Object Detection. In TPAMI, 2014.
SSDMNv3EDD3
23.
0.22
±0.16
-43.7
±34.4
68.0 14.9 38,288 88,370 76,276 33.4 30.2 31.7 4.2
SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
75919785188076

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average AP)

MOT17-08

MOT17-08

(0.83 AP)

MOT17-03

MOT17-03

(0.79 AP)

MOT17-06

MOT17-06

(0.75 AP)

...

...

MOT17-01

MOT17-01

(0.65 AP)

MOT17-14

MOT17-14

(0.56 AP)

Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
AP higher 1Average Precision taken over a set of reference recall values (0:0.1:1)
MODA higher 100%Multi-Object Detection Accuracy [1]. This measure combines false positives and missed targets.
MODP higher 100%Multi-Object Detection Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
FAF lower 0The average number of false alarms per frame.
TP higher #GTThe total number of true positives.
FP lower 0The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
Rcll higher 100%Ratio of correct detections to total number of GT boxes.
Prcn higher 100%Ratio of TP / (TP+FP).
F1 higher 100%Harmonic mean of precision and recall.
Hz higher Inf.Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark. The frequency is provided by the authors and not officially evaluated by the MOTChallenge.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
using private detections This method used a private detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.



Contact