MOT17 Results

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.


Showing only entries that use public detections!

TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
Response17
1. using public detections
50.1
61.2
±14.3
63.236.7% 22.0% 55,168159,9863,589 (50.1)7,640 (106.6)5.9Public
Anonymous submission
ISE_MOT17R
2. online method using public detections
27.9
60.1
±11.0
56.428.5% 28.1% 23,168199,4832,556 (39.5)3,182 (49.2)7.2Public
MIFT
ISE_MOT
3. online method using public detections
26.0
58.6
±10.5
54.727.0% 29.8% 23,033208,0452,368 (37.5)3,247 (51.4)16.3Public
Anonymous submission
track_bin
4. online method using public detections new
40.4
57.2
±13.3
54.822.6% 34.9% 9,462229,7922,353 (39.7)3,122 (52.7)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
FFT
5. online method using public detections
47.9
56.5
±15.7
51.026.2% 26.7% 23,746215,9715,672 (91.9)5,474 (88.7)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
Alex1
6. online method using public detections
19.0
56.1
±14.9
55.022.1% 34.9% 12,627232,9562,097 (35.7)3,398 (57.9)22.8Public
Anonymous submission
DS_MOT
7. online method using public detections
33.4
56.1
±15.8
52.721.1% 35.4% 8,866235,4493,609 (61.9)3,777 (64.8)10.0Public
Anonymous submission
MPNTrack17
8. using public detections
31.1
55.7
±13.2
59.127.2% 34.4% 25,013223,5311,433 (23.7)3,122 (51.7)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
GMOT
9. using public detections
23.7
55.4
±12.2
57.922.7% 34.7% 20,608229,5111,403 (23.7)2,765 (46.6)5.9Public
LXD, KHW @ HRI-SH
ReTracktor
10. using public detections
43.7
55.1
±14.0
52.821.4% 34.9% 15,489235,6942,119 (36.4)4,725 (81.1)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TT17
11. using public detections
37.3
54.9
±12.8
63.124.4% 38.1% 20,236233,2951,088 (18.5)2,392 (40.8)2.5Public
TIP-21754-2019
LSST17
12. using public detections
46.2
54.7
±12.9
62.320.4% 40.1% 26,091228,4341,243 (20.9)3,726 (62.6)1.5Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
DGCT
13. using public detections
38.8
54.5
±13.1
51.321.0% 35.4% 10,471243,1432,865 (50.3)4,889 (85.9)7.0Public
CJY, HYW, KHW @ HRI-SH
ISDH_HDAv2
14. online method using public detections
45.6
54.5
±14.5
65.926.4% 32.1% 46,693207,0933,010 (47.6)6,000 (94.8)3.6Public
MM-008988/ IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
TPM
15. using public detections
45.1
54.2
±13.0
52.622.8% 37.5% 13,739242,7301,824 (32.0)2,472 (43.4)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
MCLT17
16. using public detections
26.0
54.2
±12.3
63.524.0% 38.1% 23,602233,7831,208 (20.6)2,394 (40.9)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
HDTR
17. using public detections
36.8
54.1
±11.4
48.423.3% 34.8% 18,002238,8181,895 (32.9)2,693 (46.7)1.8Public
MOT_TBC
18. using public detections
53.2
53.9
±15.7
50.020.2% 36.7% 24,584232,6702,945 (50.1)4,612 (78.5)6.7Public
Anonymous submission
Tracktor17
19. online method using public detections
54.3
53.5
±14.5
52.319.5% 36.6% 12,201248,0472,072 (37.0)4,611 (82.3)1.5Public
P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
MOT_AF
20. online method using public detections
37.6
53.5
±13.4
55.619.2% 37.6% 12,867247,8161,672 (29.8)3,516 (62.7)25.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SCNet
21. online method using public detections
57.3
53.2
±15.4
54.920.0% 32.1% 30,440231,1092,621 (44.4)6,031 (102.2)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
MFT
22. online method using public detections
71.8
53.1
±16.6
50.120.4% 39.4% 35,295225,6063,681 (61.3)6,271 (104.5)0.7Public
Anonymous submission
CRF_TRA
23. using public detections
40.4
53.1
±12.2
53.724.2% 30.7% 27,194234,9912,518 (43.2)4,918 (84.3)1.4Public
Anonymous submission
UTA
24. online method using public detections
52.8
53.0
±11.6
52.221.7% 31.5% 24,468238,3562,292 (39.7)6,231 (107.9)5.0Public
Anonymous submission
TLO_MHT
25. online method using public detections
51.4
52.9
±12.9
53.320.1% 37.6% 24,142238,8342,565 (44.5)4,101 (71.1)20.7Public
Anonymous submission
SMOT_no
26. online method using public detections
57.6
52.9
±12.3
54.118.7% 32.8% 26,703236,3462,702 (46.5)6,340 (109.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
ENFT17
27. using public detections
39.5
52.8
±13.1
57.123.1% 36.8% 26,754237,9091,667 (28.8)2,557 (44.2)0.5Public
BUAA
MMHT17
28. online method using public detections
45.5
52.8
±12.9
53.320.3% 37.5% 25,401238,4132,596 (45.0)4,103 (71.1)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
PV
29. online method using public detections
59.6
52.8
±14.1
51.819.7% 34.0% 15,884246,9393,711 (66.0)8,757 (155.7)3.5Public
Anonymous submission
LSST17O
30. online method using public detections
55.3
52.7
±13.3
57.917.9% 36.6% 22,512241,9362,167 (37.9)7,443 (130.3)1.8Public
Multi-Object Tracking with Multiple Cues and Switcher-Aware Classification
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
IDGA
31. using public detections
34.9
52.6
±13.4
61.323.6% 40.2% 29,049236,8301,402 (24.2)2,613 (45.0)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
JBNOT
32. using public detections
54.3
52.6
±12.3
50.819.7% 35.8% 31,572232,6593,050 (51.9)3,792 (64.5)5.4Public
R. Henschel, Y. Zou, B. Rosenhahn. Multiple People Tracking using Body and Joint Detections. In CVPRW, 2019.
TLO17
33. online method using public detections
51.3
52.6
±12.9
51.319.5% 38.2% 20,089244,9302,530 (44.7)4,170 (73.7)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
OMHT
34. online method using public detections
48.1
52.6
±12.9
51.919.3% 38.0% 20,153244,9982,552 (45.1)4,148 (73.3)37.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOTPP17
35. using public detections
43.3
52.4
±15.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 19,922246,1832,223 (39.4)2,769 (49.1)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
PP17
36. using public detections
53.6
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,183245,9982,215 (39.3)2,752 (48.8)1.9Public
Anonymous submission
TppNoFPN
37. using public detections
61.7
52.4
±15.3
52.618.5% 37.2% 18,635247,1042,726 (48.5)5,461 (97.2)4.2Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT
38. using public detections
54.1
52.4
±13.4
50.822.4% 40.0% 20,176246,1582,224 (39.5)2,769 (49.1)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
TTL
39. online method using public detections
58.1
52.3
±12.9
51.319.3% 38.2% 21,617244,5012,779 (49.0)4,290 (75.7)21.5Public
Anonymous submission
HTBT
40. using public detections
47.3
52.3
±13.3
54.522.5% 36.4% 28,743238,2681,959 (33.9)2,973 (51.5)0.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
PointMOT17
41. using public detections
53.8
52.2
±13.3
50.822.4% 40.0% 22,012245,2772,134 (37.8)2,652 (46.9)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
SMOTe
42. online method using public detections
63.8
52.1
±12.1
53.818.4% 33.3% 27,571239,7242,691 (46.8)6,134 (106.7)1.0Public
Anonymous submission
ResTestV2
43. using public detections new
56.4
52.0
±16.4
50.919.2% 36.3% 33,320234,4812,836 (48.5)4,835 (82.7)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
FAMNet
44. online method using public detections
57.8
52.0
±12.0
48.719.1% 33.4% 14,138253,6163,072 (55.8)5,318 (96.6)0.0Public
P. Chu, H. Ling. FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
MOTF17
45. using public detections
58.6
52.0
±13.2
50.520.1% 40.4% 19,222249,4642,293 (41.1)3,297 (59.1)2.2Public
Anonymous submission
eTC17
46. using public detections
45.0
51.9
±12.4
58.123.1% 35.5% 36,164232,7832,288 (38.9)3,071 (52.3)0.7Public
G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the connectivity: Multi-object tracking with trackletnet. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019.
LSMT
47. online method using public detections
49.8
51.9
±12.0
53.517.4% 35.0% 18,672250,6622,257 (40.6)5,733 (103.2)8.9Public
Anonymous submission
CMT
48. using public detections
44.1
51.8
±12.9
60.719.6% 42.8% 29,528240,9601,217 (21.2)2,008 (35.0)6.5Public
#Submission: TIP-21190-2019
TOPA
49. online method using public detections
52.3
51.8
±13.5
53.419.6% 33.1% 27,603241,5462,668 (46.7)5,790 (101.2)443.9Public
Anonymous submission
eHAF17
50. using public detections
46.4
51.8
±13.2
54.723.4% 37.9% 33,212236,7721,834 (31.6)2,739 (47.2)0.7Public
H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SNet_pub
51. online method using public detections
63.1
51.7
±12.0
53.418.0% 33.5% 26,809243,0662,735 (48.0)6,157 (108.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
TAR_1
52. online method using public detections
67.7
51.6
±11.9
41.421.7% 28.7% 33,514235,8593,629 (62.4)5,949 (102.2)5.6Public
Anonymous submission
GNNT
53. online method using public detections
59.8
51.5
±20.8
49.624.7% 28.7% 45,121212,77915,498 (248.8)6,605 (106.0)7.6Public
Anonymous submission
AFN17
54. using public detections
52.1
51.5
±13.0
46.920.6% 35.5% 22,391248,4202,593 (46.3)4,308 (77.0)1.8Public
H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
overlap
55. using public detections
39.2
51.5
±13.1
55.623.0% 36.1% 38,322233,2751,860 (31.7)2,935 (50.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
PPMOT17
56. using public detections
52.8
51.5
±13.0
47.821.8% 40.1% 19,821251,4952,492 (45.0)2,986 (53.9)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
ReID_Seq
57. online method using public detections
55.7
51.4
±12.7
49.220.3% 34.1% 23,045247,8853,226 (57.5)4,148 (74.0)14.0Public
Anonymous submission
YOONKJ17
58. online method using public detections
58.2
51.4
±13.5
54.021.2% 37.3% 29,051243,2022,118 (37.2)3,072 (54.0)3.4Public
Anonymous submission
AReid17
59. online method using public detections
47.6
51.4
±12.2
53.919.2% 32.3% 30,079241,3642,993 (52.3)6,373 (111.4)33.7Public
Anonymous submission
FWT
60. using public detections
58.1
51.3
±13.1
47.621.4% 35.2% 24,101247,9212,648 (47.2)4,279 (76.3)0.2Public
R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
NOTA
61. using public detections
52.7
51.3
±11.7
54.517.1% 35.4% 20,148252,5312,285 (41.4)5,798 (105.0)17.8Public
L. Chen, H. Ai, R. Chen, Z. Zhuang. Aggregate Tracklet Appearance Features for Multi-Object Tracking. In IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2019.
jCC
62. using public detections
50.1
51.2
±14.5
54.520.9% 37.0% 25,937247,8221,802 (32.1)2,984 (53.2)1.8Public
M. Keuper, S. Tang, B. Andres, T. Brox, B. Schiele. Motion Segmentation amp; Multiple Object Tracking by Correlation Co-Clustering. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2018.
STCG17
63. using public detections
47.8
51.1
±12.9
54.520.4% 38.6% 32,258241,9161,702 (29.8)2,483 (43.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
DTBasline
64. online method using public detections
50.7
51.1
±11.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
MOT17ZH
65. online method using public detections
61.8
51.1
±13.7
53.416.7% 35.5% 20,309253,2452,549 (46.2)5,910 (107.2)3.7Public
Anonymous submission
SRPN17
66. online method using public detections
64.9
51.0
±11.7
53.516.8% 35.1% 21,011252,8082,596 (47.0)5,981 (108.4)4.1Public
Anonymous submission
MOLF
67. online method using public detections
65.1
50.9
±12.3
46.718.3% 34.6% 29,398242,8374,535 (79.6)5,343 (93.8)30.5Public
Anonymous submission
STRN_MOT17
68. online method using public detections
60.7
50.9
±11.6
56.018.9% 33.8% 25,295249,3652,397 (43.0)9,363 (167.8)13.8Public
J. Xu, Y. Cao, Z. Zhang, H. Hu. Spatial-Temporal Relation Networks for Multi-Object Tracking. In ICCV, 2019.
MOTDT17
69. online method using public detections
56.8
50.9
±11.9
52.717.5% 35.7% 24,069250,7682,474 (44.5)5,317 (95.7)18.3Public
C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
MHT_DAM
70. using public detections
60.2
50.7
±13.7
47.220.8% 36.9% 22,875252,8892,314 (41.9)2,865 (51.9)0.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
TCT4
71. online method using public detections new
65.0
50.7
±15.4
50.924.5% 25.6% 46,638224,9556,543 (108.8)7,968 (132.5)14.1Public
Anonymous submission
TriplDSort
72. using public detections
81.3
50.7
±15.3
50.520.3% 36.6% 51,739222,2124,397 (72.5)7,352 (121.3)0.6Public
Anonymous submission
TLMHT
73. using public detections
62.0
50.6
±12.5
56.517.6% 43.4% 22,213255,0301,407 (25.7)2,079 (37.9)2.6Public
H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
SFS
74. online method using public detections
78.8
50.5
±13.1
52.217.0% 40.8% 30,925245,9222,275 (40.3)5,270 (93.4)0.9Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMP17
75. using public detections
51.8
50.4
±13.1
52.318.8% 38.7% 22,535255,3561,868 (34.1)3,473 (63.4)7.4Public
DEEP_TAMA
76. online method using public detections
56.1
50.3
±13.3
53.519.2% 37.5% 25,479252,9962,192 (39.7)3,978 (72.1)1.5Public
Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
Q_ls
77. online method using public detections
78.6
50.2
±14.4
43.619.7% 37.3% 23,143253,1514,414 (80.1)6,112 (110.9)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
CoCT
78. online method using public detections new
36.3
50.1
±12.2
55.623.9% 35.4% 49,887229,3912,075 (35.0)4,304 (72.5)57.8Public
Anonymous submission
EDMT17
79. using public detections
58.2
50.0
±13.9
51.321.6% 36.3% 32,279247,2972,264 (40.3)3,260 (58.0)0.6Public
J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
tianyi
80. using public detections
70.8
50.0
±13.7
51.020.5% 35.6% 27,839251,1483,312 (59.7)6,234 (112.3)5.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GMPHDOGM17
81. online method using public detections
57.7
49.9
±13.6
47.119.7% 38.0% 24,024255,2773,125 (57.1)3,540 (64.6)30.7Public
Y. Song, K. Yoon, Y. Yoon, K. Yow, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management. In IEEE Access, 2019.
lbc_mot
82. using public detections
51.4
49.8
±14.3
52.320.3% 36.2% 20,963259,5382,638 (48.9)5,303 (98.2)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
OST
83. using public detections
71.9
49.7
±14.0
50.417.0% 36.7% 21,811258,6493,077 (56.8)4,339 (80.1)1.7Public
Anonymous submission
MTDF17
84. online method using public detections
83.1
49.6
±13.9
45.218.9% 33.1% 37,124241,7685,567 (97.4)9,260 (162.0)1.2Public
Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
AEb
85. using public detections
43.3
49.5
±13.6
52.020.8% 38.9% 20,822262,2381,779 (33.2)4,792 (89.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_GM
86. online method using public detections
74.1
48.8
±13.4
43.219.1% 35.2% 26,260257,9714,407 (81.2)6,448 (118.8)22.3Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, A. Cavallaro. A predictor of moving objects for First-Person vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing, 2019.
OTCD_1
87. online method using public detections
76.5
48.6
±13.7
47.916.2% 41.2% 18,499268,2043,502 (66.7)5,588 (106.5)15.5Public
Q. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Wu, W. Li, N. Yu. Real-Time Online Multi-Object Tracking in Compressed Domain. In IEEE Access, 2019.
SiaIOU
88. using public detections
75.4
48.5
±16.7
48.518.9% 38.8% 26,867260,2783,152 (58.5)4,391 (81.5)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
wangs
89. online method using public detections
74.8
48.5
±14.2
45.018.3% 38.8% 25,428261,7553,233 (60.3)4,941 (92.2)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
RFTracking
90. online method using public detections
72.2
48.5
±14.8
44.917.7% 38.6% 25,739261,7103,089 (57.6)4,813 (89.8)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
DualAtte
91. online method using public detections
79.4
48.4
±14.5
43.717.6% 39.0% 24,915262,6543,423 (64.0)5,192 (97.1)0.3Public
Anonymous submission
SOTD_MC
92. online method using public detections
67.5
48.4
±15.0
45.519.4% 35.9% 33,525255,0912,531 (46.2)4,944 (90.2)67.0Public
Anonymous submission
HAM_SADF17
93. online method using public detections
64.0
48.3
±13.2
51.117.1% 41.7% 20,967269,0381,871 (35.8)3,020 (57.7)5.0Public
Y. Yoon, A. Boragule, Y. Song, K. Yoon, M. Jeon. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Historical Appearance Matching and Scene Adaptive Detection Filtering. In IEEE AVSS, 2018.
DMAN
94. online method using public detections
64.8
48.2
±12.3
55.719.3% 38.3% 26,218263,6082,194 (41.2)5,378 (100.9)0.3Public
J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
RegTL
95. using public detections
75.4
48.1
±13.7
41.618.1% 39.8% 20,850268,3633,386 (64.6)4,524 (86.3)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
2MPT
96. using public detections
60.8
48.1
±14.2
52.917.4% 39.6% 30,650260,1331,860 (34.5)2,784 (51.7)2.7Public
Anonymous submission
DeepMOTRPN
97. online method using public detections
76.6
48.1
±14.5
43.017.6% 38.6% 26,490262,5783,696 (69.1)5,353 (100.1)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
AM_ADM17
98. online method using public detections
67.1
48.1
±13.8
52.113.4% 39.7% 25,061265,4952,214 (41.8)5,027 (94.9)5.7Public
S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
PHD_GSDL17
99. online method using public detections
79.1
48.0
±13.6
49.617.1% 35.6% 23,199265,9543,998 (75.6)8,886 (168.1)6.7Public
Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
cnt_klt
100. using public detections
38.2
48.0
±11.8
57.819.0% 31.6% 63,207228,7831,215 (20.4)4,134 (69.5)59.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SRPN
101. online method using public detections
91.8
47.8
±13.2
41.417.0% 41.7% 38,279251,9894,325 (78.2)5,355 (96.8)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
LT17
102. online method using public detections
82.7
47.7
±16.6
45.217.3% 36.0% 27,856263,0624,042 (75.7)9,183 (172.0)7.2Public
Anonymous submission
Alex
103. online method using public detections
81.4
47.6
±14.2
49.813.2% 41.4% 16,028277,1102,731 (53.7)8,481 (166.7)0.2Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_bLSTM
104. using public detections
71.3
47.5
±12.6
51.918.2% 41.7% 25,981268,0422,069 (39.4)3,124 (59.5)1.9Public
C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
TCT
105. online method using public detections new
72.0
47.5
±27.1
49.323.2% 28.8% 52,209238,7165,541 (96.0)7,368 (127.7)14.1Public
Anonymous submission
E2EM
106. online method using public detections
72.8
47.5
±14.5
48.816.5% 37.5% 20,655272,1873,632 (70.2)12,712 (245.6)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
JDT
107. online method using public detections
72.3
47.4
±12.2
50.116.8% 37.2% 26,910267,3312,760 (52.5)6,211 (118.0)35.1Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_HY
108. using public detections
83.3
47.3
±121.2
49.417.2% 33.8% 46,875246,0614,231 (75.0)8,188 (145.2)2.0Public
Anonymous submission
QiMOT
109. online method using public detections
90.8
47.2
±13.1
40.815.5% 39.9% 18,907274,8284,320 (84.2)5,917 (115.4)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
DAM_MOT
110. online method using public detections
61.4
47.0
±12.6
48.716.9% 38.1% 28,933267,8962,140 (40.7)2,756 (52.5)18.7Public
Multi Object Tracking using Deep Structural Cost Minimization in Data Association
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
MASS
111. online method using public detections
83.6
46.9
±14.1
46.016.9% 36.3% 25,733269,1164,478 (85.6)11,994 (229.3)17.1Public
H. Karunasekera, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Multiple Object Tracking With Attention to Appearance, Structure, Motion and Size. In IEEE Access, 2019.
Lab031
112. using public detections
82.6
46.9
±16.2
48.117.7% 36.1% 31,634263,9383,795 (71.3)10,498 (197.3)9.4Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_Rd17
113. online method using public detections new
65.3
46.8
±14.7
54.119.7% 33.3% 38,452257,6783,865 (71.1)8,097 (149.0)30.8Public
N. Baisa. Occlusion-robust Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with a CNN-based Re-identification. In , 2019.
SNM17
114. online method using public detections
96.7
46.8
±13.8
43.416.2% 37.1% 25,104271,0424,213 (81.1)9,891 (190.3)0.8Public
Anonymous submission
KVIOU
115. online method using public detections
85.2
46.6
±14.2
44.017.3% 38.1% 34,838262,0084,379 (81.8)7,844 (146.4)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
MHT_ReID7
116. using public detections
87.9
46.5
±13.7
46.918.8% 40.3% 22,203276,3743,386 (66.4)8,521 (167.0)1.6Public
Anonymous submission
AEb_O
117. online method using public detections
74.1
46.4
±13.9
44.916.5% 41.4% 17,030283,2652,266 (45.5)5,053 (101.5)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
TTracker
118. online method using public detections
81.0
46.2
±14.0
44.021.0% 35.6% 44,854254,4384,258 (77.6)6,307 (114.9)29.6Public
Anonymous submission
PHD_LMP
119. online method using public detections
89.9
45.9
±13.1
42.515.5% 37.9% 27,946272,1964,977 (96.2)6,985 (135.0)29.4Public
Anonymous submission
DS_TW_F
120. online method using public detections
61.6
45.7
±27.0
50.910.8% 75.4% 6,528298,3681,329 (28.2)3,180 (67.5)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
OLGT_new
121. online method using public detections
77.1
45.7
±22.8
49.410.8% 75.5% 6,915298,2881,418 (30.1)3,641 (77.2)6.1Public
Anonymous submission
EDA_GNN
122. online method using public detections
82.0
45.5
±13.8
40.515.6% 40.6% 25,685277,6634,091 (80.5)5,579 (109.8)39.3Public
Paper ID 2713
IOU17
123. using public detections
83.8
45.5
±13.6
39.415.7% 40.5% 19,993281,6435,988 (119.6)7,404 (147.8)1,522.9Public
E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. High-Speed Tracking-by-Detection Without Using Image Information. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
DCORV2
124. online method using public detections
82.7
45.5
±13.9
36.114.6% 40.4% 21,161282,9013,592 (72.0)7,696 (154.4)35.5Public
Anonymous submission
HISP_DAL17
125. online method using public detections
93.9
45.4
±13.9
39.914.8% 39.2% 21,820277,4738,727 (171.7)7,147 (140.6)3.2Public
N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
zxbtk17
126. online method using public detections
90.0
45.1
±14.7
40.017.7% 31.8% 33,186273,5313,303 (64.1)8,148 (158.1)8.3Public
Anonymous submission
GF
127. online method using public detections
90.1
45.0
±13.9
39.115.0% 39.0% 22,387277,33510,397 (204.5)7,421 (145.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
dcor
128. online method using public detections
87.5
45.0
±14.2
34.015.4% 38.2% 30,231275,2654,801 (93.7)8,498 (165.9)44.4Public
Anonymous submission
DSA_MOT17
129. online method using public detections
72.3
45.0
±12.6
43.615.8% 39.2% 21,442286,4822,491 (50.6)3,824 (77.7)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
FPSN
130. online method using public detections
88.3
44.9
±13.9
48.416.5% 35.8% 33,757269,9527,136 (136.8)14,491 (277.8)10.1Public
S. Lee, E. Kim. Multiple Object Tracking via Feature Pyramid Siamese Networks. In IEEE ACCESS, 2018.
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
HISP_T17
131. online method using public detections
96.7
44.6
±14.2
38.815.1% 38.8% 25,478276,39510,617 (208.1)7,487 (146.8)4.7Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
GMPHD_DAL
132. online method using public detections
96.8
44.4
±13.9
36.214.9% 39.4% 19,170283,38011,137 (223.7)13,900 (279.3)3.4Public
N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GOTURN_3B
133. online method using public detections
92.7
44.3
±13.7
38.513.0% 43.2% 30,302279,1444,861 (96.2)5,277 (104.4)48.6Public
Anonymous submission
SAS_MOT17
134. using public detections
77.2
44.2
±12.2
57.216.1% 44.3% 29,473283,6111,529 (30.7)2,644 (53.2)4.8Public
A. Maksai, P. Fua. Eliminating Exposure Bias and Metric Mismatch in Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2019.
GM_PHD_D
135. online method using public detections
94.8
44.0
±13.8
34.214.8% 39.4% 19,135283,53013,556 (272.5)13,821 (277.8)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
Umot
136. online method using public detections
104.8
43.9
±13.8
37.815.2% 38.9% 28,596278,6219,363 (185.0)11,371 (224.6)19.7Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_SHA
137. online method using public detections
93.8
43.7
±12.5
39.211.7% 43.0% 25,935287,7583,838 (78.3)5,056 (103.2)9.2Public
Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
MOTbyReID
138. online method using public detections
101.1
43.6
±13.7
37.117.6% 36.3% 35,725270,03612,347 (236.8)11,408 (218.8)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
ZM
139. online method using public detections
106.3
43.5
±13.9
32.614.5% 39.9% 25,083284,4059,197 (185.4)8,849 (178.4)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
TPbase17
140. online method using public detections
94.8
43.3
±15.0
48.216.2% 36.6% 49,992265,8154,194 (79.3)12,103 (228.8)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
SORT17
141. online method using public detections
100.4
43.1
±13.3
39.812.5% 42.3% 28,398287,5824,852 (99.0)7,127 (145.4)143.3Public
A. Bewley, Z. Ge, L. Ott, F. Ramos, B. Upcroft. Simple online and realtime tracking. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016.
DAN__test
142. using public detections
104.0
43.0
±14.7
43.313.5% 40.0% 30,367283,5337,576 (152.3)14,990 (301.3)1.8Public
Anonymous submission
D_SST_V1
143. online method using public detections
98.4
42.7
±13.9
46.111.8% 44.4% 18,861298,9895,531 (117.7)13,775 (293.0)2.3Public
Anonymous submission
EAMTT
144. online method using public detections
95.8
42.6
±13.3
41.812.7% 42.7% 30,711288,4744,488 (91.8)5,720 (117.0)12.0Public
R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro. Online Multi-target Tracking with Strong and Weak Detections. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2016 Workshops, 2016.
ms_dh
145. online method using public detections
110.2
42.6
±14.6
40.113.6% 40.0% 31,878284,5287,446 (150.2)14,736 (297.3)4.0Public
Anonymous submission
CASC_MOT
146. online method using public detections
92.8
42.3
±12.8
46.89.1% 44.1% 21,035300,7973,616 (77.4)16,656 (356.7)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
GM_PHD
147. online method using public detections
99.2
42.1
±13.0
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_N1Tr
148. online method using public detections
99.8
42.1
±13.5
33.911.9% 42.7% 18,214297,64610,698 (226.4)10,864 (229.9)9.9Public
N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
GNNMOT
149. online method using public detections
88.7
42.0
±12.8
29.312.0% 50.0% 23,294299,6944,377 (93.4)3,847 (82.1)177.6Public
Anonymous submission
cascademot
150. online method using public detections
97.0
41.8
±16.0
34.215.2% 38.7% 27,816288,76811,535 (236.3)14,800 (303.2)17.8Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
c3d_Track
151. online method using public detections
99.8
41.5
±13.7
40.210.7% 48.5% 33,332292,9313,890 (80.9)11,454 (238.2)22.2Public
Anonymous submission
CGHA_MOT
152. online method using public detections
101.3
41.2
±14.1
44.08.3% 45.9% 25,462299,1127,294 (155.2)18,655 (397.0)11.4Public
Anonymous submission
TM_track
153. online method using public detections
118.7
41.1
±14.9
32.813.2% 41.3% 27,606287,51117,408 (355.0)15,197 (309.9)2.5Public
Anonymous submission
98K
154. using public detections
85.3
40.8
±17.2
37.015.6% 38.1% 32,312298,1743,514 (74.5)4,991 (105.8)17.7Public
Anonymous submission
XYHv2
155. online method using public detections
119.7
39.9
±12.4
23.89.9% 41.8% 29,713296,70412,900 (272.1)12,911 (272.3)7.8Public
Anonymous submission
GMPHD_KCF
156. online method using public detections
111.2
39.6
±13.6
36.68.8% 43.3% 50,903284,2285,811 (117.1)7,414 (149.4)3.3Public
T. Kutschbach, E. Bochinski, V. Eiselein, T. Sikora. Sequential Sensor Fusion Combining Probability Hypothesis Density and Kernelized Correlation Filters for Multi-Object Tracking in Video Data. In International Workshop on Traffic and Street Surveillance for Safety and Security at IEEE AVSS 2017, 2017.
CTRACKER
157. online method using public detections
94.2
39.4
±13.5
26.113.4% 42.5% 16,249307,90017,592 (387.2)14,508 (319.3)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
GoturnM17
158. online method using public detections
112.1
38.3
±9.0
25.79.4% 47.1% 55,381282,67010,328 (207.0)9,849 (197.4)11.8Public
Anonymous submission
GLMBS3
159. using public detections
106.6
38.0
±13.7
32.39.3% 52.8% 38,874304,0166,963 (151.0)3,927 (85.2)4.9Public
Anonymous submission
baitrack
160. using public detections
78.8
37.6
±19.4
20.321.0% 30.9% 99,085244,0018,808 (155.2)6,708 (118.2)6.4Public
Anonymous submission
TrackerAvg RankMOTAIDF1MTMLFPFNID Sw.FragHzDetector
GM_PHD
161. online method using public detections
101.6
36.4
±14.1
33.94.1% 57.3% 23,723330,7674,607 (111.3)11,317 (273.5)38.4Public
V. Eiselein, D. Arp, M. Pätzold, T. Sikora. Real-time Multi-Human Tracking using a Probability Hypothesis Density Filter and multiple detectors. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, 2012.
YoloSort
162. online method using public detections
91.9
29.5
±24.1
41.715.0% 36.4% 154,747238,2414,888 (84.6)4,952 (85.7)14.4Public
Anonymous submission
JOINT_TRAC
163. using public detections
102.5
29.4
±17.6
34.512.6% 42.3% 132,192260,8085,397 (100.4)10,704 (199.0)66.9Public
Anonymous submission
MOT_BJ
164. online method using public detections
125.1
-7.3
±23.5
1.40.0% 99.1% 52,007548,5314,824 (1,734.0)8,621 (3,098.8)0.0Public
Anonymous submission

Benchmark Statistics

SequencesFramesTrajectoriesBoxes
21177572355564228

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT17-03-SDP

MOT17-03-SDP

(70.6% MOTA)

MOT17-03-FRCNN

MOT17-03-FRCNN

(58.7% MOTA)

MOT17-03-DPM

MOT17-03-DPM

(50.0% MOTA)

...

...

MOT17-14-DPM

MOT17-14-DPM

(20.2% MOTA)

MOT17-14-FRCNN

MOT17-14-FRCNN

(19.3% MOTA)


Evaluation Measures

Lower is better. Higher is better.
Measure Better Perfect Description
Avg Rank lower 1 This is the rank of each tracker averaged over all present evaluation measures.
MOTA higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Accuracy [1]. This measure combines three error sources: false positives, missed targets and identity switches.
MOTP higher 100 % Multiple Object Tracking Precision [1]. The misalignment between the annotated and the predicted bounding boxes.
IDF1 higher 100 % ID F1 Score [2]. The ratio of correctly identified detections over the average number of ground-truth and computed detections.
FAF lower 0 The average number of false alarms per frame.
MT higher 100 % Mostly tracked targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at least 80% of their respective life span.
ML lower 0 % Mostly lost targets. The ratio of ground-truth trajectories that are covered by a track hypothesis for at most 20% of their respective life span.
FP lower 0 The total number of false positives.
FN lower 0 The total number of false negatives (missed targets).
ID Sw. lower 0 The total number of identity switches. Please note that we follow the stricter definition of identity switches as described in [3].
Frag lower 0 The total number of times a trajectory is fragmented (i.e. interrupted during tracking).
Hz higher Inf. Processing speed (in frames per second excluding the detector) on the benchmark.

Legend

Symbol Description
online method This is an online (causal) method, i.e. the solution is immediately available with each incoming frame and cannot be changed at any later time.
using public detections This method used the provided detection set as input.
new This entry has been submitted or updated less than a week ago.

References:


[1] Bernardin, K. & Stiefelhagen, R. Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. Image and Video Processing, 2008(1):1-10, 2008.
[2] Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R., Cucchiara, R. & Tomasi, C. Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. In ECCV workshop on Benchmarking Multi-Target Tracking, 2016.
[3] Li, Y., Huang, C. & Nevatia, R. Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.