MOT16 Results

Download all results for this benchmark

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.

Showing only entries that use public detections!

Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
DS_v2 1.	17.6	59.3 ±12.9	57.5	24.2%	29.1%	7,465	65,810	887 (13.9)	2,738 (42.8)	39.4	Public
	Anonymous submission
MTT_TPR 2.	23.3	54.9 ±11.7	53.1	18.7%	34.8%	4,130	76,673	1,447 (25.0)	3,693 (63.7)	6.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
HDTR 3.	17.0	53.6 ±8.7	46.6	21.2%	37.0%	4,714	79,353	618 (10.9)	833 (14.7)	3.6	Public
TPM 4.	23.1	51.3 ±9.3	47.9	18.7%	40.8%	2,701	85,504	569 (10.7)	707 (13.3)	0.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
UTA 5.	30.8	50.5 ±7.9	45.0	18.3%	33.5%	7,745	81,582	987 (17.9)	2,199 (39.8)	5.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
PV 6.	29.8	50.4 ±10.1	50.8	14.9%	38.9%	2,600	86,780	1,061 (20.2)	3,181 (60.7)	7.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
CRF_TRACK 7.	21.3	50.3 ±7.9	54.4	18.3%	35.7%	7,148	82,746	702 (12.9)	1,387 (25.4)	0.6	Public
	Anonymous submission
MEN 8.	26.1	50.0 ±9.1	52.8	15.0%	37.0%	6,117	84,271	706 (13.1)	1,797 (33.4)	2.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
RTT 9.	30.8	49.9 ±8.0	49.3	19.0%	32.8%	9,927	80,406	955 (17.1)	2,247 (40.2)	1.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
CMT16 10.	16.7	49.8 ±9.0	59.2	16.6%	43.6%	9,229	81,882	365 (6.6)	617 (11.2)	6.3	Public
	#Submission: TCSVT-02964-2019
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
NOTA 11.	21.3	49.8 ±8.3	55.3	17.9%	37.7%	7,248	83,614	614 (11.3)	1,372 (25.3)	19.2	Public
	BMVC 2019 Submition 298
ENFT16 12.	24.4	49.6 ±8.4	52.0	19.1%	39.3%	10,649	80,617	628 (11.3)	937 (16.8)	0.4	Public
	BUAA
siameseCos 13.	25.5	49.4 ±8.4	49.8	19.1%	39.4%	6,281	85,384	679 (12.8)	823 (15.5)	0.8	Public
	In preparation
STCG 14.	22.6	49.3 ±8.6	52.0	16.2%	41.4%	6,886	84,979	515 (9.6)	775 (14.5)	22.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
HCC 15.	20.3	49.3 ±10.2	50.7	17.8%	39.9%	5,333	86,795	391 (7.5)	535 (10.2)	0.8	Public
	L. Ma, S. Tang, M. Black, L. Gool. Customized Multi-Person Tracker. In Computer Vision -- ACCV 2018, 2018.
LSST16O 16.	29.6	49.2 ±10.2	56.5	13.4%	41.4%	7,187	84,875	606 (11.3)	2,497 (46.7)	2.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
eTC 17.	23.4	49.2 ±9.1	56.1	17.3%	40.3%	8,400	83,702	606 (11.2)	882 (16.3)	0.7	Public
	G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNet. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07258, 2018.
AFN 18.	25.6	49.0 ±10.2	48.2	19.1%	35.7%	9,508	82,506	899 (16.4)	1,383 (25.3)	0.6	Public
	H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
CRF_RNN16 19.	21.6	49.0 ±7.2	53.9	18.1%	35.8%	8,495	83,838	621 (11.5)	1,252 (23.2)	1.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
DAST 20.	24.7	48.9 ±8.4	53.2	15.2%	36.2%	9,987	82,427	838 (15.3)	1,936 (35.3)	8.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
KCF16 21.	31.8	48.8 ±9.6	47.2	15.8%	38.1%	5,875	86,567	906 (17.3)	1,116 (21.2)	0.1	Public
	P. Chu, H. Fan, C. Tan, H. Ling. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Instance-Aware Tracker and Dynamic Model Refreshment. In WACV, 2019.
LMP 22.	23.9	48.8 ±9.8	51.3	18.2%	40.1%	6,654	86,245	481 (9.1)	595 (11.3)	0.5	Public
	S. Tang, M. Andriluka, B. Andres, B. Schiele. Multiple People Tracking with Lifted Multicut and Person Re-identification. In CVPR, 2017.
DeepMP16 23.	21.3	48.7 ±10.3	50.1	15.0%	43.6%	4,111	88,862	535 (10.4)	873 (17.0)	9.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
TLMHT 24.	25.8	48.7 ±8.6	55.3	15.7%	44.5%	6,632	86,504	413 (7.9)	642 (12.2)	4.8	Public
	H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
AOReid 25.	25.5	48.2 ±8.7	50.8	15.3%	36.8%	10,283	83,301	821 (15.1)	1,963 (36.1)	11.2	Public
	Anonymous submission
GCRA 26.	29.3	48.2 ±8.3	48.6	12.9%	41.1%	5,104	88,586	821 (16.0)	1,117 (21.7)	2.8	Public
	C. Ma, C. Yang, F. Yang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, H. Jia, X. Xie. Trajectory Factory: Tracklet Cleaving and Re-connection by Deep Siamese Bi-GRU for Multiple Object Tracking. In ICME, 2018.
SRPN16 27.	34.4	48.2 ±8.5	51.3	14.2%	36.8%	7,767	85,973	790 (14.9)	2,006 (38.0)	1.4	Public
	Anonymous submission
FWT 28.	31.7	47.8 ±9.4	44.3	19.1%	38.2%	8,886	85,487	852 (16.0)	1,534 (28.9)	0.6	Public
	R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
MOTDT 29.	30.2	47.6 ±8.2	50.9	15.2%	38.3%	9,253	85,431	792 (14.9)	1,858 (35.0)	20.6	Public
	C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
NLLMPa 30.	25.9	47.6 ±10.6	47.3	17.0%	40.4%	5,844	89,093	629 (12.3)	768 (15.0)	8.3	Public
	E. Levinkov, J. Uhrig, S. Tang, M. Omran, E. Insafutdinov, A. Kirillov, C. Rother, T. Brox, B. Schiele, B. Andres. Joint Graph Decomposition and Node Labeling: Problem, Algorithms, Applications. In CVPR, 2017.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
EAGS16 31.	23.3	47.4 ±10.4	50.1	17.3%	42.7%	8,369	86,931	575 (11.0)	913 (17.5)	197.3	Public
	H. Sheng, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Chen. Enhanced Association with Supervoxels in Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In IEEE Access, 2018.
JCSTD 32.	35.5	47.4 ±8.3	41.1	14.4%	36.4%	8,076	86,638	1,266 (24.1)	2,697 (51.4)	8.8	Public
	W. Tian, M. Lauer, L. Chen. Online Multi-Object Tracking Using Joint Domain Information in Traffic Scenarios. In IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019.
ASTT 33.	27.3	47.2 ±9.6	44.3	16.3%	41.6%	4,680	90,877	633 (12.6)	814 (16.2)	0.5	Public
	Yi Tao el al., “Adaptive Spatio-temporal Model Based Multiple Object Tracking Considering a Moving Camera[C]”, International Conference on Universal Village (UV), 2018.
eHAF16 34.	27.2	47.2 ±16.8	52.4	18.6%	42.8%	12,586	83,107	542 (10.0)	787 (14.5)	0.5	Public
	H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
AMIR 35.	30.8	47.2 ±7.7	46.3	14.0%	41.6%	2,681	92,856	774 (15.8)	1,675 (34.1)	1.0	Public
	A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
MCjoint 36.	26.4	47.1 ±10.8	52.3	20.4%	46.9%	6,703	89,368	370 (7.3)	598 (11.7)	0.6	Public
	}@article{DBLP:journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16, author = {Margret Keuper and Siyu Tang and Zhongjie Yu and Bjoern Andres and Thomas Brox and Bernt Schiele}, title = {A Multi-cut Formulation for Joint Segmentation and Tracking of Multiple Objects}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1607.06317}, year = {2016}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06317}, timestamp = {Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:41:31 +0200}, biburl = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bib/journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org} }
NOMT 37.	24.8	46.4 ±9.9	53.3	18.3%	41.4%	9,753	87,565	359 (6.9)	504 (9.7)	2.6	Public
	W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
JMC 38.	31.3	46.3 ±9.0	46.3	15.5%	39.7%	6,373	90,914	657 (13.1)	1,114 (22.2)	0.8	Public
	S. Tang, B. Andres, M. Andriluka, B. Schiele. Multi-Person Tracking by Multicuts and Deep Matching. In BMTT, 2016.
DD_TAMA16 39.	27.5	46.2 ±8.4	49.4	14.1%	44.0%	5,126	92,367	598 (12.1)	1,127 (22.8)	6.5	Public
	Young-Chul Yoon, Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking with Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association, For Journal submission
DMAN 40.	30.5	46.1 ±11.1	54.8	17.4%	42.7%	7,909	89,874	532 (10.5)	1,616 (31.9)	0.3	Public
	J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
STAM16 41.	38.2	46.0 ±9.1	50.0	14.6%	43.6%	6,895	91,117	473 (9.5)	1,422 (28.4)	0.2	Public
	Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
deepS2 42.	29.5	46.0 ±8.2	46.5	15.5%	42.6%	5,124	92,697	693 (14.1)	759 (15.4)	0.7	Public
	ID 32
RAR16pub 43.	39.1	45.9 ±9.7	48.8	13.2%	41.9%	6,871	91,173	648 (13.0)	1,992 (39.8)	0.9	Public
	K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
MHT_DAM 44.	32.3	45.8 ±8.9	46.1	16.2%	43.2%	6,412	91,758	590 (11.9)	781 (15.7)	0.8	Public
	C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MTDF 45.	42.6	45.7 ±11.2	40.1	14.1%	36.4%	12,018	84,970	1,987 (37.2)	3,377 (63.2)	1.5	Public
	Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
INTERA_MOT 46.	29.0	45.4 ±8.6	47.7	18.1%	38.7%	13,407	85,547	600 (11.3)	930 (17.5)	4.3	Public
	L. Lan, X. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Tao, W. Gao, T. Huang. Interacting Tracklets for Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018.
EDMT 47.	31.0	45.3 ±9.1	47.9	17.0%	39.9%	11,122	87,890	639 (12.3)	946 (18.3)	1.8	Public
	J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
DCCRF16 48.	38.8	44.8 ±9.8	39.7	14.1%	42.3%	5,613	94,133	968 (20.0)	1,378 (28.5)	0.1	Public
	H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TBSS 49.	40.3	44.6 ±9.3	42.6	12.3%	43.9%	4,136	96,128	790 (16.7)	1,419 (30.0)	3.0	Public
	X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
QuadMOT16 50.	39.8	44.1 ±9.4	38.3	14.6%	44.9%	6,388	94,775	745 (15.5)	1,096 (22.8)	1.8	Public
	J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
CDA_DDALv2 51.	38.6	43.9 ±7.8	45.1	10.7%	44.4%	6,450	95,175	676 (14.1)	1,795 (37.6)	0.5	Public
	S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
LFNF16 52.	41.3	43.6 ±11.0	41.6	13.3%	45.7%	6,616	95,363	836 (17.5)	938 (19.7)	0.6	Public
	Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
oICF 53.	40.2	43.2 ±10.2	49.3	11.3%	48.5%	6,651	96,515	381 (8.1)	1,404 (29.8)	0.4	Public
	H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
MHT_bLSTM6 54.	40.7	42.1 ±9.7	47.8	14.9%	44.4%	11,637	93,172	753 (15.4)	1,156 (23.6)	1.8	Public
	C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
OST16 55.	43.8	41.5 ±9.2	39.1	10.7%	45.6%	5,919	99,709	1,056 (23.3)	1,487 (32.8)	4.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
LINF1 56.	38.0	41.0 ±9.5	45.7	11.6%	51.3%	7,896	99,224	430 (9.4)	963 (21.1)	4.2	Public
	L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
PHD_GSDL16 57.	44.3	41.0 ±8.9	43.1	11.3%	41.5%	6,498	99,257	1,810 (39.7)	3,650 (80.1)	8.3	Public
	Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
PMPTracker 58.	46.3	40.3 ±11.7	38.2	10.4%	42.0%	10,071	97,524	1,343 (28.9)	2,764 (59.4)	148.0	Public
	Light version of PTZ camera Mutiple People Tracker
AM_ADM 59.	40.9	40.1 ±10.1	43.8	7.1%	46.2%	8,503	99,891	789 (17.5)	1,736 (38.4)	5.8	Public
	S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
D_cost16 60.	35.8	39.9 ±9.1	35.3	8.7%	50.2%	1,133	107,586	790 (19.3)	824 (20.1)	8.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
EAMTT_pub 61.	42.6	38.8 ±8.5	42.4	7.9%	49.1%	8,114	102,452	965 (22.0)	1,657 (37.8)	11.8	Public
	R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
OVBT 62.	55.0	38.4 ±8.8	37.8	7.5%	47.3%	11,517	99,463	1,321 (29.1)	2,140 (47.1)	0.3	Public
	Y. Ban, S. Ba, X. Alameda-Pineda, R. Horaud. Tracking Multiple Persons Based on a Variational Bayesian Model. In BMTT 2016, .
HAM_ACT16 63.	37.2	38.1 ±8.2	43.3	7.8%	54.4%	6,976	105,434	418 (9.9)	707 (16.8)	8.0	Public
GMMCP 64.	47.5	38.1 ±7.8	35.5	8.6%	50.9%	6,607	105,315	937 (22.2)	1,669 (39.5)	0.5	Public
	A. Dehghan, S. Assari, M. Shah.. GMMCP-Tracker:Globally Optimal Generalized Maximum Multi Clique Problem for Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2015.
LTTSC-CRF 65.	46.2	37.6 ±9.9	42.1	9.6%	55.2%	11,969	101,343	481 (10.8)	1,012 (22.8)	0.6	Public
	N. Le, A. Heili, M. Odobez. Long-Term Time-Sensitive Costs for CRF-Based Tracking by Detection. In ECCVw, 2016.
JCmin_MOT 66.	38.8	36.7 ±9.1	36.2	7.5%	54.4%	2,936	111,890	667 (17.3)	831 (21.5)	14.8	Public
	M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
HISP_T 67.	48.8	35.9 ±8.5	28.9	7.8%	50.1%	6,412	107,918	2,594 (63.6)	2,298 (56.3)	4.8	Public
	N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
LP2D 68.	41.8	35.7 ±10.1	34.2	8.7%	50.7%	5,084	111,163	915 (23.4)	1,264 (32.4)	49.3	Public
	MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
GM_PHD_DAL 69.	49.3	35.1 ±9.1	26.6	7.0%	51.4%	2,350	111,886	4,047 (104.8)	5,338 (138.2)	3.5	Public
	https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333521185_Online_Multi-object_Visual_Tracking_using_a_GM-PHD_Filter_with_Deep_Appearance_Learning
GM_PHD_Dl 70.	50.3	34.3 ±9.1	20.5	7.1%	51.5%	2,350	111,886	5,605 (145.1)	5,357 (138.7)	3.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
RNN_A_P 71.	52.9	34.0 ±8.6	33.7	7.9%	51.0%	8,562	109,269	2,479 (61.9)	3,393 (84.7)	19.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_e17 72.	50.8	33.8 ±8.9	25.3	6.3%	54.9%	1,766	115,130	3,778 (102.5)	3,874 (105.1)	3.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
TBD 73.	55.5	33.7 ±9.2	0.0	7.2%	54.2%	5,804	112,587	2,418 (63.2)	2,252 (58.9)	1.3	Public
	A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
GM_PHD_N1T 74.	48.9	33.3 ±8.9	25.5	5.5%	56.0%	1,750	116,452	3,499 (96.8)	3,594 (99.5)	9.9	Public
	N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
CEM 75.	44.9	33.2 ±7.9	0.0	7.8%	54.4%	6,837	114,322	642 (17.2)	731 (19.6)	0.3	Public
	A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
CppSORT 76.	45.2	31.5 ±9.0	27.7	4.3%	59.9%	3,048	120,278	1,587 (46.6)	2,239 (65.8)	687.1	Public
	S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
GMPHD_HDA 77.	39.8	30.5 ±6.9	33.4	4.6%	59.7%	5,169	120,970	539 (16.0)	731 (21.7)	13.6	Public
	Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
SMOT 78.	62.7	29.7 ±7.3	0.0	5.3%	47.7%	17,426	107,552	3,108 (75.8)	4,483 (109.3)	0.2	Public
	C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
DCOR 79.	45.3	28.3 ±9.0	21.7	3.4%	63.9%	1,618	128,345	849 (28.7)	2,592 (87.5)	32.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
MHT_ReID 80.	44.4	27.1 ±47.2	36.4	30.6%	31.4%	13,068	118,829	1,071 (30.8)	1,141 (32.8)	0.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
JPDA_m 81.	40.0	26.2 ±6.1	0.0	4.1%	67.5%	3,689	130,549	365 (12.9)	638 (22.5)	22.2	Public
	H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
DP_NMS 82.	38.6	26.2 ±9.3	31.2	4.1%	67.5%	3,689	130,557	365 (12.9)	638 (22.5)	5.9	Public
	H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT16-03

(52.1% MOTA)

MOT16-06

(45.1% MOTA)

MOT16-07

(38.8% MOTA)

...

...

MOT16-08

(30.4% MOTA)

MOT16-14

(24.7% MOTA)