MOT16 Results

Download all results for this benchmark

Click on a measure to sort the table accordingly. See below for a more detailed description.

Showing only entries that use public detections!

Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
DS_v2 1.	19.6	59.3 ±12.9	57.5	24.2%	29.1%	7,465	65,810	887 (13.9)	2,738 (42.8)	39.4	Public
	Anonymous submission
DpTrack 2.	29.0	56.5 ±18.5	45.0	22.7%	30.8%	8,149	68,840	2,387 (38.3)	2,930 (47.1)	4.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
MHT___ReID 3.	31.8	56.4 ±11.6	54.2	39.7%	17.4%	23,791	54,169	1,478 (21.0)	1,547 (22.0)	0.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
MTT_TPR 4.	26.7	54.9 ±11.7	53.1	18.7%	34.8%	4,130	76,673	1,447 (25.0)	3,693 (63.7)	6.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracktor16 5.	26.0	54.4 ±12.0	52.5	19.0%	36.9%	3,280	79,149	682 (12.1)	1,480 (26.2)	1.5	Public
	P. Bergmann, T. Meinhardt, L. Leal-Taixé. Tracking without bells and whistles. In ICCV, 2019.
HDTR 6.	19.9	53.6 ±8.7	46.6	21.2%	37.0%	4,714	79,353	618 (10.9)	833 (14.7)	3.6	Public
TPM 7.	26.9	51.3 ±9.3	47.9	18.7%	40.8%	2,701	85,504	569 (10.7)	707 (13.3)	0.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
UTA 8.	30.8	50.6 ±7.9	50.4	18.3%	33.5%	7,752	81,584	722 (13.1)	2,196 (39.7)	5.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
PV 9.	34.0	50.4 ±10.1	50.8	14.9%	38.9%	2,600	86,780	1,061 (20.2)	3,181 (60.7)	7.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
CRF_TRACK 10.	23.0	50.3 ±7.9	54.4	18.3%	35.7%	7,148	82,746	702 (12.9)	1,387 (25.4)	1.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
CRFTrack16 11.	23.7	50.3 ±7.9	54.4	18.3%	35.7%	7,148	82,746	702 (12.9)	1,387 (25.4)	1.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
ENFT16 12.	22.9	50.3 ±8.3	55.0	19.2%	39.8%	8,341	81,843	490 (8.9)	754 (13.7)	0.4	Public
	BUAA
MEN 13.	30.4	50.0 ±9.1	52.8	15.0%	37.0%	6,117	84,271	706 (13.1)	1,797 (33.4)	2.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
pairwise16 14.	24.7	50.0 ±65.9	52.4	19.4%	38.7%	10,995	79,568	628 (11.1)	939 (16.7)	22.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
ENFT 15.	19.0	50.0 ±8.2	54.6	17.8%	41.1%	8,214	82,541	479 (8.8)	724 (13.2)	22.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
RTT 16.	35.6	49.9 ±8.0	49.3	19.0%	32.8%	9,927	80,406	955 (17.1)	2,247 (40.2)	1.8	Public
	Anonymous submission
CMT16 17.	19.8	49.8 ±9.0	59.2	16.6%	43.6%	9,229	81,882	365 (6.6)	617 (11.2)	6.3	Public
	#Submission: TCSVT-02964-2019
NOTA 18.	24.7	49.8 ±8.3	55.3	17.9%	37.7%	7,248	83,614	614 (11.3)	1,372 (25.3)	19.2	Public
	SPL-26677-2019
siameseCos 19.	29.8	49.4 ±8.4	49.8	19.1%	39.4%	6,281	85,384	679 (12.8)	823 (15.5)	0.8	Public
	In preparation
STCG 20.	26.5	49.3 ±8.6	52.0	16.2%	41.4%	6,886	84,979	515 (9.6)	775 (14.5)	22.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
HCC 21.	23.9	49.3 ±10.2	50.7	17.8%	39.9%	5,333	86,795	391 (7.5)	535 (10.2)	0.8	Public
	L. Ma, S. Tang, M. Black, L. Gool. Customized Multi-Person Tracker. In Computer Vision -- ACCV 2018, 2018.
LSST16O 22.	33.8	49.2 ±10.2	56.5	13.4%	41.4%	7,187	84,875	606 (11.3)	2,497 (46.7)	2.0	Public
	Anonymous submission
eTC 23.	27.5	49.2 ±9.1	56.1	17.3%	40.3%	8,400	83,702	606 (11.2)	882 (16.3)	0.7	Public
	G. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Gu, J. Hwang. Exploit the Connectivity: Multi-Object Tracking with TrackletNet. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07258, 2018.
AFN 24.	29.8	49.0 ±10.2	48.2	19.1%	35.7%	9,508	82,506	899 (16.4)	1,383 (25.3)	0.6	Public
	H. Shen, L. Huang, C. Huang, W. Xu. Tracklet Association Tracker: An End-to-End Learning-based Association Approach for Multi-Object Tracking. In CoRR, 2018.
CRF_RNN16 25.	25.3	49.0 ±7.2	53.9	18.1%	35.8%	8,495	83,838	621 (11.5)	1,252 (23.2)	1.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
DAST 26.	28.8	48.9 ±8.4	53.2	15.2%	36.2%	9,987	82,427	838 (15.3)	1,936 (35.3)	8.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
KCF16 27.	36.6	48.8 ±9.6	47.2	15.8%	38.1%	5,875	86,567	906 (17.3)	1,116 (21.2)	0.1	Public
	P. Chu, H. Fan, C. Tan, H. Ling. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Instance-Aware Tracker and Dynamic Model Refreshment. In WACV, 2019.
LMP 28.	27.8	48.8 ±9.8	51.3	18.2%	40.1%	6,654	86,245	481 (9.1)	595 (11.3)	0.5	Public
	S. Tang, M. Andriluka, B. Andres, B. Schiele. Multiple People Tracking with Lifted Multicut and Person Re-identification. In CVPR, 2017.
DeepMP16 29.	25.1	48.7 ±10.3	50.1	15.0%	43.6%	4,111	88,862	535 (10.4)	873 (17.0)	9.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
TLMHT 30.	29.3	48.7 ±8.6	55.3	15.7%	44.5%	6,632	86,504	413 (7.9)	642 (12.2)	4.8	Public
	H. Sheng, J. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ke, Z. Xiong, J. Yu. Iterative Multiple Hypothesis Tracking with Tracklet-level Association. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
AOReid 31.	29.8	48.2 ±8.7	50.8	15.3%	36.8%	10,283	83,301	821 (15.1)	1,963 (36.1)	11.2	Public
	Anonymous submission
GCRA 32.	33.8	48.2 ±8.3	48.6	12.9%	41.1%	5,104	88,586	821 (16.0)	1,117 (21.7)	2.8	Public
	C. Ma, C. Yang, F. Yang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, H. Jia, X. Xie. Trajectory Factory: Tracklet Cleaving and Re-connection by Deep Siamese Bi-GRU for Multiple Object Tracking. In ICME, 2018.
SRPN16 33.	39.5	48.2 ±8.5	51.3	14.2%	36.8%	7,767	85,973	790 (14.9)	2,006 (38.0)	1.4	Public
	Anonymous submission
FWT 34.	36.7	47.8 ±9.4	44.3	19.1%	38.2%	8,886	85,487	852 (16.0)	1,534 (28.9)	0.6	Public
	R. Henschel, L. Leal-Taixé, D. Cremers, B. Rosenhahn. Fusion of Head and Full-Body Detectors for Multi-Object Tracking. In Trajnet CVPRW, 2018.
MOTDT 35.	35.0	47.6 ±8.2	50.9	15.2%	38.3%	9,253	85,431	792 (14.9)	1,858 (35.0)	20.6	Public
	C. Long, A. Haizhou, Z. Zijie, S. Chong. Real-time Multiple People Tracking with Deeply Learned Candidate Selection and Person Re-identification. In ICME, 2018.
NLLMPa 36.	30.0	47.6 ±10.6	47.3	17.0%	40.4%	5,844	89,093	629 (12.3)	768 (15.0)	8.3	Public
	E. Levinkov, J. Uhrig, S. Tang, M. Omran, E. Insafutdinov, A. Kirillov, C. Rother, T. Brox, B. Schiele, B. Andres. Joint Graph Decomposition and Node Labeling: Problem, Algorithms, Applications. In CVPR, 2017.
EAGS16 37.	27.2	47.4 ±10.4	50.1	17.3%	42.7%	8,369	86,931	575 (11.0)	913 (17.5)	197.3	Public
	H. Sheng, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Chen. Enhanced Association with Supervoxels in Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In IEEE Access, 2018.
JCSTD 38.	40.1	47.4 ±8.3	41.1	14.4%	36.4%	8,076	86,638	1,266 (24.1)	2,697 (51.4)	8.8	Public
	W. Tian, M. Lauer, L. Chen. Online Multi-Object Tracking Using Joint Domain Information in Traffic Scenarios. In IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019.
ASTT 39.	31.6	47.2 ±9.6	44.3	16.3%	41.6%	4,680	90,877	633 (12.6)	814 (16.2)	0.5	Public
	Yi Tao el al., “Adaptive Spatio-temporal Model Based Multiple Object Tracking Considering a Moving Camera[C]”, International Conference on Universal Village (UV), 2018.
eHAF16 40.	31.6	47.2 ±16.8	52.4	18.6%	42.8%	12,586	83,107	542 (10.0)	787 (14.5)	0.5	Public
	H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Zhang. Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
AMIR 41.	35.5	47.2 ±7.7	46.3	14.0%	41.6%	2,681	92,856	774 (15.8)	1,675 (34.1)	1.0	Public
	A. Sadeghian, A. Alahi, S. Savarese. Tracking The Untrackable: Learning To Track Multiple Cues with Long-Term Dependencies. In ICCV, 2017.
MCjoint 42.	30.3	47.1 ±10.8	52.3	20.4%	46.9%	6,703	89,368	370 (7.3)	598 (11.7)	0.6	Public
	}@article{DBLP:journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16, author = {Margret Keuper and Siyu Tang and Zhongjie Yu and Bjoern Andres and Thomas Brox and Bernt Schiele}, title = {A Multi-cut Formulation for Joint Segmentation and Tracking of Multiple Objects}, journal = {CoRR}, volume = {abs/1607.06317}, year = {2016}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06317}, timestamp = {Wed, 07 Jun 2017 14:41:31 +0200}, biburl = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bib/journals/corr/KeuperTYABS16}, bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, http://dblp.org} }
YOONKJ16 43.	37.6	47.0 ±8.4	50.1	16.5%	41.8%	7,901	88,179	627 (12.1)	945 (18.3)	3.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
NOMT 44.	28.8	46.4 ±9.9	53.3	18.3%	41.4%	9,753	87,565	359 (6.9)	504 (9.7)	2.6	Public
	W. Choi. Near-Online Multi-target Tracking with Aggregated Local Flow Descriptor. In ICCV, 2015.
JMC 45.	36.0	46.3 ±9.0	46.3	15.5%	39.7%	6,373	90,914	657 (13.1)	1,114 (22.2)	0.8	Public
	S. Tang, B. Andres, M. Andriluka, B. Schiele. Multi-Person Tracking by Multicuts and Deep Matching. In BMTT, 2016.
DD_TAMA16 46.	31.6	46.2 ±8.4	49.4	14.1%	44.0%	5,126	92,367	598 (12.1)	1,127 (22.8)	6.5	Public
	Y. Yoon, D. Kim, K. Yoon, Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Pedestrian Tracking using Deep Temporal Appearance Matching Association. In arXiv:1907.00831, 2019.
DMAN 47.	34.9	46.1 ±11.1	54.8	17.4%	42.7%	7,909	89,874	532 (10.5)	1,616 (31.9)	0.3	Public
	J. Zhu, H. Yang, N. Liu, M. Kim, W. Zhang, M. Yang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Dual Matching Attention Networks. In ECCV, 2018.
STAM16 48.	43.1	46.0 ±9.1	50.0	14.6%	43.6%	6,895	91,117	473 (9.5)	1,422 (28.4)	0.2	Public
	Q. Chu, W. Ouyang, H. Li, X. Wang, B. Liu, N. Yu. Online Multi-object Tracking Using CNN-Based Single Object Tracker with Spatial-Temporal Attention Mechanism. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017.
deepS2 49.	34.2	46.0 ±8.2	46.5	15.5%	42.6%	5,124	92,697	693 (14.1)	759 (15.4)	0.7	Public
	ID 32
RAR16pub 50.	44.4	45.9 ±9.7	48.8	13.2%	41.9%	6,871	91,173	648 (13.0)	1,992 (39.8)	0.9	Public
	K. Fang, Y. Xiang, X. Li, S. Savarese. Recurrent Autoregressive Networks for Online Multi-Object Tracking. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
MHT_DAM 51.	37.1	45.8 ±8.9	46.1	16.2%	43.2%	6,412	91,758	590 (11.9)	781 (15.7)	0.8	Public
	C. Kim, F. Li, A. Ciptadi, J. Rehg. Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
MTDF 52.	48.3	45.7 ±11.2	40.1	14.1%	36.4%	12,018	84,970	1,987 (37.2)	3,377 (63.2)	1.5	Public
	Z. Fu, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Multi-Level Cooperative Fusion of GM-PHD Filters for Online Multiple Human Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2019.
INTERA_MOT 53.	33.3	45.4 ±8.6	47.7	18.1%	38.7%	13,407	85,547	600 (11.3)	930 (17.5)	4.3	Public
	L. Lan, X. Wang, S. Zhang, D. Tao, W. Gao, T. Huang. Interacting Tracklets for Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018.
EDMT 54.	35.6	45.3 ±9.1	47.9	17.0%	39.9%	11,122	87,890	639 (12.3)	946 (18.3)	1.8	Public
	J. Chen, H. Sheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong. Enhancing Detection Model for Multiple Hypothesis Tracking. In BMTT-PETS CVPRw, 2017.
DCCRF16 55.	43.7	44.8 ±9.8	39.7	14.1%	42.3%	5,613	94,133	968 (20.0)	1,378 (28.5)	0.1	Public
	H. Zhou, W. Ouyang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Li. Deep Continuous Conditional Random Fields with Asymmetric Inter-object Constraints for Online Multi-object Tracking. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2018.
TBSS 56.	45.5	44.6 ±9.3	42.6	12.3%	43.9%	4,136	96,128	790 (16.7)	1,419 (30.0)	3.0	Public
	X. Zhou, P. Jiang, Z. Wei, H. Dong, F. Wang. Online Multi-Object Tracking with Structural Invariance Constraint. In BMVC, 2018.
QuadMOT16 57.	44.8	44.1 ±9.4	38.3	14.6%	44.9%	6,388	94,775	745 (15.5)	1,096 (22.8)	1.8	Public
	J. Son, M. Baek, M. Cho, B. Han. Multi-Object Tracking with Quadruplet Convolutional Neural Networks. In CVPR, 2017.
CDA_DDALv2 58.	43.4	43.9 ±7.8	45.1	10.7%	44.4%	6,450	95,175	676 (14.1)	1,795 (37.6)	0.5	Public
	S. Bae and K. Yoon, Confidence-Based Data Association and Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning for Robust Online Multi-Object Tracking , In IEEE TPAMI, 2017.
LFNF16 59.	46.3	43.6 ±11.0	41.6	13.3%	45.7%	6,616	95,363	836 (17.5)	938 (19.7)	0.6	Public
	Sheng H, Hao L, Chen J, et al. Robust Local Effective Matching Model for Multi-Target Tracking. In PCM, 2017
oICF 60.	45.0	43.2 ±10.2	49.3	11.3%	48.5%	6,651	96,515	381 (8.1)	1,404 (29.8)	0.4	Public
	H. Kieritz, S. Becker, W. Hübner, M. Arens. Online Multi-Person Tracking using Integral Channel Features. In IEEE Advanced Video and Signal-based Surveillance (AVSS) 2016, 2016.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
MHT_bLSTM6 61.	46.0	42.1 ±9.7	47.8	14.9%	44.4%	11,637	93,172	753 (15.4)	1,156 (23.6)	1.8	Public
	C. Kim, F. Li, J. Rehg. Multi-object Tracking with Neural Gating Using Bilinear LSTM. In ECCV, 2018.
OST16 62.	48.8	41.5 ±9.2	39.1	10.7%	45.6%	5,919	99,709	1,056 (23.3)	1,487 (32.8)	4.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
LINF1 63.	42.4	41.0 ±9.5	45.7	11.6%	51.3%	7,896	99,224	430 (9.4)	963 (21.1)	4.2	Public
	L. Fagot-Bouquet, R. Audigier, Y. Dhome, F. Lerasle. Improving Multi-Frame Data Association with Sparse Representations for Robust Near-Online Multi-Object Tracking. In ECCV, 2016.
PHD_GSDL16 64.	49.4	41.0 ±8.9	43.1	11.3%	41.5%	6,498	99,257	1,810 (39.7)	3,650 (80.1)	8.3	Public
	Z. Fu, P. Feng, F. Angelini, J. Chambers, S. Naqvi. Particle PHD Filter based Multiple Human Tracking using Online Group-Structured Dictionary Learning. In IEEE Access, 2018.
PMPTracker 65.	51.6	40.3 ±11.7	38.2	10.4%	42.0%	10,071	97,524	1,343 (28.9)	2,764 (59.4)	148.0	Public
	Light version of PTZ camera Mutiple People Tracker
AM_ADM 66.	46.0	40.1 ±10.1	43.8	7.1%	46.2%	8,503	99,891	789 (17.5)	1,736 (38.4)	5.8	Public
	S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Bae, Learning Discriminative Appearance Models for Online Multi-Object Tracking with Appearance Discriminability Measures, In IEEE Access, 2018.
D_cost16 67.	40.0	39.9 ±9.1	35.3	8.7%	50.2%	1,133	107,586	790 (19.3)	824 (20.1)	8.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
EAMTT_pub 68.	47.5	38.8 ±8.5	42.4	7.9%	49.1%	8,114	102,452	965 (22.0)	1,657 (37.8)	11.8	Public
	R. Sanchez-Matilla, F. Poiesi, A. Cavallaro "Multi-target tracking with strong and weak detections" in BMTT ECCVw 2016
OVBT 69.	60.9	38.4 ±8.8	37.8	7.5%	47.3%	11,517	99,463	1,321 (29.1)	2,140 (47.1)	0.3	Public
	Y. Ban, S. Ba, X. Alameda-Pineda, R. Horaud. Tracking Multiple Persons Based on a Variational Bayesian Model. In BMTT 2016, .
HAM_ACT16 70.	41.1	38.1 ±8.2	43.3	7.8%	54.4%	6,976	105,434	418 (9.9)	707 (16.8)	8.0	Public
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
GMMCP 71.	52.8	38.1 ±7.8	35.5	8.6%	50.9%	6,607	105,315	937 (22.2)	1,669 (39.5)	0.5	Public
	A. Dehghan, S. Assari, M. Shah.. GMMCP-Tracker:Globally Optimal Generalized Maximum Multi Clique Problem for Multiple Object Tracking. In CVPR, 2015.
LTTSC-CRF 72.	51.3	37.6 ±9.9	42.1	9.6%	55.2%	11,969	101,343	481 (10.8)	1,012 (22.8)	0.6	Public
	N. Le, A. Heili, M. Odobez. Long-Term Time-Sensitive Costs for CRF-Based Tracking by Detection. In ECCVw, 2016.
HISP_DAL 73.	52.4	37.4 ±8.8	30.5	7.6%	50.9%	3,222	108,865	2,101 (52.1)	2,151 (53.4)	3.3	Public
	N. Baisa. Robust Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter with Discriminative Deep Appearance Learning. In CoRR, 2019.
JCmin_MOT 74.	43.3	36.7 ±9.1	36.2	7.5%	54.4%	2,936	111,890	667 (17.3)	831 (21.5)	14.8	Public
	M. Abhijeet Boragule. Joint Cost Minimization for Multi-Object Tracking. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Vide and Signale Based Surveillance, 2017.
HISP_T 75.	54.2	35.9 ±8.5	28.9	7.8%	50.1%	6,412	107,918	2,594 (63.6)	2,298 (56.3)	4.8	Public
	N. Baisa. Online Multi-target Visual Tracking using a HISP Filter. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 5: VISAPP,, 2018.
LP2D 76.	46.4	35.7 ±10.1	34.2	8.7%	50.7%	5,084	111,163	915 (23.4)	1,264 (32.4)	49.3	Public
	MOT baseline: Linear programming on 2D image coordinates.
GM_PHD_DAL 77.	54.8	35.1 ±9.1	26.6	7.0%	51.4%	2,350	111,886	4,047 (104.8)	5,338 (138.2)	3.5	Public
	N. Baisa. Online Multi-object Visual Tracking using a GM-PHD Filter with Deep Appearance Learning. In 22nd International Conference on Information Fusion, 2019.
GM_PHD_Dl 78.	55.8	34.3 ±9.1	20.5	7.1%	51.5%	2,350	111,886	5,605 (145.1)	5,357 (138.7)	3.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
RNN_A_P 79.	59.0	34.0 ±8.6	33.7	7.9%	51.0%	8,562	109,269	2,479 (61.9)	3,393 (84.7)	19.7	Public
	Anonymous submission
GM_PHD_e17 80.	56.3	33.8 ±8.9	25.3	6.3%	54.9%	1,766	115,130	3,778 (102.5)	3,874 (105.1)	3.3	Public
	Anonymous submission
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
TBD 81.	61.8	33.7 ±9.2	0.0	7.2%	54.2%	5,804	112,587	2,418 (63.2)	2,252 (58.9)	1.3	Public
	A. Geiger, M. Lauer, C. Wojek, C. Stiller, R. Urtasun. 3D Traffic Scene Understanding from Movable Platforms. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 2014.
GM_PHD_N1T 82.	54.3	33.3 ±8.9	25.5	5.5%	56.0%	1,750	116,452	3,499 (96.8)	3,594 (99.5)	9.9	Public
	N. Baisa, A. Wallace. Development of a N-type GM-PHD filter for multiple target, multiple type visual tracking. In Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2019.
CEM 83.	49.7	33.2 ±7.9	0.0	7.8%	54.4%	6,837	114,322	642 (17.2)	731 (19.6)	0.3	Public
	A. Milan, S. Roth, K. Schindler. Continuous Energy Minimization for Multitarget Tracking. In IEEE TPAMI, 2014.
CppSORT 84.	49.8	31.5 ±9.0	27.7	4.3%	59.9%	3,048	120,278	1,587 (46.6)	2,239 (65.8)	687.1	Public
	S. Murray. Real-Time Multiple Object Tracking - A Study on the Importance of Speed. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03572, 2017.
GMPHD_HDA 85.	44.3	30.5 ±6.9	33.4	4.6%	59.7%	5,169	120,970	539 (16.0)	731 (21.7)	13.6	Public
	Y. Song, M. Jeon. Online Multiple Object Tracking with the Hierarchically Adopted GM-PHD Filter using Motion and Appearance. In IEEE/IEIE The International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) Asia, 2016.
SMOT 86.	69.3	29.7 ±7.3	0.0	5.3%	47.7%	17,426	107,552	3,108 (75.8)	4,483 (109.3)	0.2	Public
	C. Dicle, O. Camps, M. Sznaier. The Way They Move: Tracking Targets with Similar Appearance. In ICCV, 2013.
DCOR 87.	50.0	28.3 ±9.0	21.7	3.4%	63.9%	1,618	128,345	849 (28.7)	2,592 (87.5)	32.9	Public
	Anonymous submission
MHT_ReID 88.	49.1	27.1 ±47.2	36.4	30.6%	31.4%	13,068	118,829	1,071 (30.8)	1,141 (32.8)	0.5	Public
	Anonymous submission
JPDA_m 89.	44.3	26.2 ±6.1	0.0	4.1%	67.5%	3,689	130,549	365 (12.9)	638 (22.5)	22.2	Public
	H. Rezatofighi, A. Milan, Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, A. Dick, I. Reid. Joint Probabilistic Data Association Revisited. In ICCV, 2015.
DP_NMS 90.	42.7	26.2 ±9.3	31.2	4.1%	67.5%	3,689	130,557	365 (12.9)	638 (22.5)	5.9	Public
	H. Pirsiavash, D. Ramanan, C. Fowlkes. Globally-Optimal Greedy Algorithms for Tracking a Variable Number of Objects. In CVPR, 2011.
Tracker	Avg Rank	MOTA	IDF1	MT	ML	FP	FN	ID Sw.	Frag	Hz	Detector
test_trker 91.	46.2	0.0 ±0.0	0.0	0.0%	100.0%	7	182,326	0 (nan)	0 (nan)	22.3	Public
	Anonymous submission

Difficulty Analysis

Sequence difficulty (from easiest to hardest, measured by average MOTA)

MOT16-03

(51.2% MOTA)

MOT16-06

(44.4% MOTA)

MOT16-07

(38.2% MOTA)

...

...

MOT16-08

(29.7% MOTA)

MOT16-14

(24.4% MOTA)